Did anyone just see O'Reilly tear into Jeremy Glick?

Fox News | 2/4/03

[pizzagulasch]

i think we are actually missing the point, at it's quite clear. THE ROOT OF THIS ARGUEMENT is that they both can't agree what toppings or best on a pizza. Mr. O'Reilly in his conservative natural will stick with the baiscs, pepperoni or sausuage...stretching it a bit if he orders extra cheese. Where on the other hand, this floozy Glick would rather screw up everything pizza stands for and make it into some mutated foriegn food. Calamari? Pickles? THE LINES BEEN DRAWN, what side of the pizza are you on. squares or triangles.

[VRWC_minion]

Interesting opinion and such nice flowery language. Your skillful use of the english vocabulary makes your points so stimulating. I wish more Freepers had the language skills that DU'ers have.

[VRWC_minion]

Next time

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

Thanks. My first abuse report ever.

[JavaTheHutt]

re: post 202 this thread.
Posting guidelines state "Do keep it clean - A bruise or two between Freepers is tolerable, but refrain from abusive attacks, engaging in senseless flame wars, and using profane language. Considering the range of topics we discuss, it's hard to be a family site, but that's what we aim for when at all possible. "

Profanity like that is not called for or welcome here.

Admin please delete post 202 and hand mr potty mouth a bar of soap to wash his mouth out with.

[Admin Moderator]

"Admin please delete post 202"

The Osama lover is gone.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

Thank you. Today looks like it could set a record for banned trolls.

[Admin Moderator]

;)

[Mustang]

Thanks for the "shinbone" link re: "America's Enemy List"...

Good stuff...very informative.

Mustang sends w/Best FReegards.

[finnman69]

The anger you hear is the discust with anti-americans Whereas O'Reilly has an opinion on dealing with Saddam, Mr. Glick chooses to defend Saddam and leave him be. In fact Mr. Glick thinks America and our leaders is equal to or worse than the Taliban or Saddam Hussein.

Mr. Or'eilly never opressed anyone. If he really wanted to oppose Mr. Glick's point of view, he would never have asked him to appear on the show. O'Reilly cut off Mr. Glick because he kept babbling non-sensical propaganda, and worse, he patronized mr. O'Reilly.

No one wants war as a first effort to achieve peace. However, remember, it was Saddam Hussein himself who initiated hostilities, and he currently funds terrorism as well as harbors weapons of mass destruction. He has lied to the world body and the UN for 12 years. Enough time has passed for a peaceful solution, and in the aftermath of 9/11, we are not willing to afford Mr. Hussein and others like him any more time to enter the human race and civilization.

Think about this, without the threat of war, Saddam Hussein would NEVER have allowed new inspections back into Iraq. Most of us here believe without a doubt that Saddam will never disarm willfully or leave peacefully.

The world said our invasion of Afghanistan and the defeat of the Taliban would provoke a firestorm of arab anger around the world. On the contrary, we have made the world significantly safer and noone misses the Islamnist Taliban.

Keep your eyes open here at FR and you might learn something.

[pizzagulasch]

who wants pizzA!?

[Allan]

Even before I checked your sign-up date
it was clear that you were a girly-boy from DU
by the fact that you know neither how to spell
nor to punctuate.

[finnman69]

Glick seems to be the new Cynthia McKinney Joan of Arc for the Stupid.

[rintense]

Another typical liberal hit and run poster. Hey Mattao! Get your silly a$$ back here so you can be ripped apart correctly.

[hanna_ohlen]

I feel it was O'Reilly who behaved badly. Glick has every right to his opinion. Shame and humiliation on O'Reilly and all those who disrespect free speech.