Replies

The anger you hear is the discust with anti-americans Whereas O'Reilly has an opinion on dealing with Saddam, Mr. Glick chooses to defend Saddam and leave him be. In fact Mr. Glick thinks America and our leaders is equal to or worse than the Taliban or Saddam Hussein.

Mr. Or'eilly never opressed anyone. If he really wanted to oppose Mr. Glick's point of view, he would never have asked him to appear on the show. O'Reilly cut off Mr. Glick because he kept babbling non-sensical propaganda, and worse, he patronized mr. O'Reilly.

No one wants war as a first effort to achieve peace. However, remember, it was Saddam Hussein himself who initiated hostilities, and he currently funds terrorism as well as harbors weapons of mass destruction. He has lied to the world body and the UN for 12 years. Enough time has passed for a peaceful solution, and in the aftermath of 9/11, we are not willing to afford Mr. Hussein and others like him any more time to enter the human race and civilization.

Think about this, without the threat of war, Saddam Hussein would NEVER have allowed new inspections back into Iraq. Most of us here believe without a doubt that Saddam will never disarm willfully or leave peacefully.

The world said our invasion of Afghanistan and the defeat of the Taliban would provoke a firestorm of arab anger around the world. On the contrary, we have made the world significantly safer and noone misses the Islamnist Taliban.

Keep your eyes open here at FR and you might learn something.