Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
That wouldn't be a new interpretation.

New or not, the issue is whether it is your interpretation. If it is indeed your interpretation of Washington et al in their views, and if it is also your interpretation, as you have oft asserted, that The Lincoln shared identically in those views, then The Lincoln was a racist contrary to your assertions elsewhere.

205 posted on 02/06/2003 10:48:39 AM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
That wouldn't be a new interpretation.

New or not, the issue is whether it is your interpretation. If it is indeed your interpretation of Washington et al in their views, and if it is also your interpretation, as you have oft asserted, that The Lincoln shared identically in those views, then The Lincoln was a racist contrary to your assertions elsewhere.

Washington, Madison, Jackson and Lincoln vary not one whit in their view of the permanance of Union.

You should stop the creative writing and prove otherwise in their words.

Walt

212 posted on 02/06/2003 11:08:18 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa (To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson