Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
That wouldn't be a new interpretation.

New or not, the issue is whether it is your interpretation. If it is indeed your interpretation of Washington et al in their views, and if it is also your interpretation, as you have oft asserted, that The Lincoln shared identically in those views, then The Lincoln was a racist contrary to your assertions elsewhere.

Washington, Madison, Jackson and Lincoln vary not one whit in their view of the permanance of Union.

You should stop the creative writing and prove otherwise in their words.

Walt

212 posted on 02/06/2003 11:08:18 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa (To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
Washington, Madison, Jackson and Lincoln vary not one whit in their view of the permanance of Union. You should stop the creative writing and prove otherwise in their words.

Don't try to change the subject, Walt. You stated not only this but that they held identical views of the Constitution. You also stated that the Constitution was created by those same men for racist purposes.

If both of your statements are true, that means that The Lincoln was also a racist. Yet that contradicts your claims elsewhere. I am asking you "which is it?" Is The Lincoln's view identical, making him a racist, or is he not a racist, meaning his view is not identical? You can't have it both ways.

217 posted on 02/06/2003 11:17:34 AM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson