To: freepersup
Do you know what the exposure of the photo was. I am curious why it doesn't show any components leaving the shuttle beside the "fuzz" off the back. I read that the breakup was well under way over Lubbek Tx not to far from the photo site. Also...was the photo cropped in any way and blown up.
To: tubebender
# 1642: According to the story, (if it isn't a cover) what we are seeing is what they are seeing. I can't answer your questions- just yet.
They would have had to preset the focal length at an estimate based on the shuttle's altitude at time on target (overhead) wouldn't they ? I can't see them tracking the shuttle and adjusting the focus at the same time. I don't doubt that lots of astronomical viewing devices in our inventory have automatic adjustments of some kind or another. This sounded like a duct tape, paper clip, rubber band- patch job, that for all intent and purpose, did what it was supposed to do.
1,645 posted on
02/13/2003 8:46:15 PM PST by
freepersup
(And this expectation will not disappoint us.)
To: tubebender
Without consulting a map, I'd say the location at Kirtland is around 500-550 miles from the point of estimated break up (the point halfway between Amarillo and Lubbock).
1,649 posted on
02/13/2003 8:57:04 PM PST by
freepersup
(And this expectation will not disappoint us.)
To: tubebender
Lubbock is over 300 miles down range of Albuquerque.
1,650 posted on
02/13/2003 8:58:10 PM PST by
DonnerT
(Columbia and The Seven when the wheels fell.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson