Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tubebender
# 1642: According to the story, (if it isn't a cover) what we are seeing is what they are seeing. I can't answer your questions- just yet.

They would have had to preset the focal length at an estimate based on the shuttle's altitude at time on target (overhead) wouldn't they ? I can't see them tracking the shuttle and adjusting the focus at the same time. I don't doubt that lots of astronomical viewing devices in our inventory have automatic adjustments of some kind or another. This sounded like a duct tape, paper clip, rubber band- patch job, that for all intent and purpose, did what it was supposed to do.
1,645 posted on 02/13/2003 8:46:15 PM PST by freepersup (And this expectation will not disappoint us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1642 | View Replies ]


To: freepersup
This sounded like a duct tape, paper clip, rubber band- patch job, that for all intent and purpose, did what it was supposed to do.

I agree...It takes me 5 minutes to compose and edit a one line reply here and then it still has mistakes.

Oh...just one more question. Was it digital or film.

1,648 posted on 02/13/2003 8:56:45 PM PST by tubebender (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1645 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson