Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BraveMan
1494 - thanks for the wing under construction photo, BM. I see no serious longitudinal reinforcement in the forward section, except where it bolts to the body. I guess they figured low stress there.

It appears to me that if you Shoot a high pressure blast of air on that blunt leading edge on the very front, and the latitudinal supports will just fold back against the body, as I theorized, if I am interpreting the photo correctly.
1,537 posted on 02/13/2003 4:52:13 AM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1494 | View Replies ]


To: XBob
Thought you might be interested in reading this. You might've seen it already.

Trio Took Shuttle Photo With Equipment
By LESLIE HOFFMAN
ASSOCIATED PRESS

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) -

The shadowy, closely-analyzed photo of space shuttle Columbia's underside was not snapped with cutting-edge military equipment, but by three researchers playing around with an old computer and an ordinary telescope in their free time, officials said Wednesday.

The grainy photo was made Feb. 1 at the Starfire Optical Range at Kirtland Air Force Base and released Friday by NASA. It shows what appears to be a suspicious bulge on the shuttle's wing shortly before it broke apart.

But contrary to reports last week, the photo was not snapped by one of Starfire's extraordinarily powerful telescopes, which are designed to spy on enemy satellites and detect incoming missiles.

Instead, it was taken by Starfire Optical Range engineers who, in their free time, had rigged up a device using a commercially available 3 1/2-inch telescope and an 11-year-old Macintosh computer, the researchers said. The telescope was surplus laboratory equipment, kept in a cabinet at the Starfire range.

"We were not asked by NASA to do this," said Robert Fugate, the optical range's technical director. "There was no official project or tasking to do this. The people who work here are geeks. This was an opportunity to look at a rapidly moving object and try to take a picture of it. That's really all it was."

The researchers, Maj. Robert Johnson, Rick Cleis, and Roger Petty, said Wednesday they wanted to set the record straight about the image, since its grainy quality had raised questions among those familiar with the Starfire range's capabilities. They said they used none of the technology the Starfire range is famous for.

"This is the blurriest picture we've ever taken of anything, and this is the one that makes the front page of the newspapers," Johnson said.

The men said they realized their photo's significance about 10 minutes after it was taken, after a family member called them to say the shuttle had been lost.

The shuttle's breakup also was captured on video by two Dutch air force pilots training near Fort Hood in central Texas. The Apache helicopter was about 100 feet from the ground when the aircraft's video camera filmed the shuttle.

"This camera is more powerful than others" that have captured footage of the shuttle, said Maj. Matt Garner, a public affairs officer at Fort Hood. "It has the exact time, down to the second, along with the direction the camera is looking."

ABC aired the black and white video on its evening news show Wednesday night. It shows the shuttle broken into several pieces streaking across the sky.

The video has been turned over to NASA and will be analyzed, said Johnson Space Center spokesman Alan Buis.

1,538 posted on 02/13/2003 4:56:29 AM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1537 | View Replies ]

To: XBob
sounds like we think some of the fainter objects in the California video were some of the Al skin from the wing glove?

How does that square with the need to have zippering of the RCC?

If structure is melting from the airframe over CA-NV, the RCC has to zipper somewhere out over the Pacific.

Perhaps we should do some calculating of the position of the vehicle and the trajectory of the RCC panels.
1,552 posted on 02/13/2003 7:51:48 AM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1537 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson