Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tall_Texan
I believe it called "a point of no return".

Now, let's say that the LEM goes down to the moon, lands hard and causes one of the lander legs to buckle. For this reason, the two occupants can't return to the command module in the ascent stage. They're, in effect, stranded.

What do you suppose the backup plan was?
97 posted on 02/03/2003 10:49:03 PM PST by Doohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Doohickey
What do you suppose the backup plan was?

Dunno. I keep picturing in my mind extremely long ropes.

But, as my point mentioned before, the moon missions and spacewalks were a different matter because they were pushing the envelope and trying to accomplish things that had never been done. This business of sending up shuttles to see how moths copulate in zero gravity and such is a little different - they had opened the door to civilians, not just trained military pilots. They had geezers like John Glenn going up there. That, if nothing else, sent the signal that these missions were no longer considered very risky.

I realize that planes, trains and automobiles crash too and that there are no guarantees. That's not the issue. The issue is that a craft in orbit might be disabled for a whole host of possible reasons and what I'm hearing is that NASA had no plan to even try to safely get them down. That's acceptable when you are dealing with risky new territory. It's not acceptable with something expected to go up hundreds of times.

171 posted on 02/03/2003 11:24:09 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Where liberals lead, misery follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson