Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Take care, doughtyOne. For the record, I don't think NASA's beyond reproach. I just think that guilt must be proven, particularly in these circumstances. I'm defending them, but if you convince me otherwise, I'll change my tune. I promise.

Rest well!

275 posted on 02/03/2003 7:35:12 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
"I don't think NASA's beyond reproach. I just think that guilt must be proven,"

The one thing we can be certain about is the fact that someone made the wrong decision, or didn't identify and assess a problem correctly. I don't think anyone wants to face the reality of making this horrible error. However an error was made without question.

With all the back and forth on this I have yet to see a post with a reasonable explanation for failure that is unrelated to the loose foam. If it wasn't the foam, then it was a defective problem that should have been identified prior to launch.
334 posted on 02/03/2003 8:29:02 PM PST by Clean_Sweep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson