Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jhoffa_
"A telescoping arm in the docking bay would accomplish the same end.."

Which weighs more?...Which costs more?

--Boris

151 posted on 02/03/2003 6:13:05 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: boris
You obviously have an advantage on me here..

But I would assume that in the weightlessness of space that an arm could be pretty spindly and light here, but still be functional there.

It's certainly cheaper and doesn't require more than basic electronics to guide it reliably, in addition the arm has no fuel consumption requirements to place it's use into the "time sensitive" category..

I would go with a tublar arm with drive motors and geared friction devices (like a volkswagon bumper jack, simplistic example) for extension and rotation driven by stepper motors, all run by a microcontroller with a camera on the end.

Okay, go ahead and blast me out of the sky now..

(So to speak.. :)

166 posted on 02/03/2003 6:22:53 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (A Shrubbery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson