Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boris
You obviously have an advantage on me here..

But I would assume that in the weightlessness of space that an arm could be pretty spindly and light here, but still be functional there.

It's certainly cheaper and doesn't require more than basic electronics to guide it reliably, in addition the arm has no fuel consumption requirements to place it's use into the "time sensitive" category..

I would go with a tublar arm with drive motors and geared friction devices (like a volkswagon bumper jack, simplistic example) for extension and rotation driven by stepper motors, all run by a microcontroller with a camera on the end.

Okay, go ahead and blast me out of the sky now..

(So to speak.. :)

166 posted on 02/03/2003 6:22:53 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (A Shrubbery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Jhoffa_
PS: To further dig my grave, the steppers provide a means of encoding the arm's movements...

They are not like a motor that goes "zizz" when powered.

They are used for precise movement in X-Y tables and such.

176 posted on 02/03/2003 6:28:42 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (A Shrubbery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Jhoffa_
PS: I honestly think a PIC Microcontroller and < a thousand bucks would do such a thing..
213 posted on 02/03/2003 6:54:28 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (A Shrubbery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson