Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton & NASA's Fall: Is Bill Clinton responsible for the Columbia disaster?
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | February 3, 2003 | Lowell Ponte

Posted on 02/03/2003 6:04:09 AM PST by SJackson

PONTEFICATIONS

AS WE WATCHED SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA’S FIREBALL falling earthward Saturday on America’s news channels, my wife Ellen said, "Well, at least we can assume that no more space shuttles will be given names that begin with the letter ‘C.’ Seven astronauts died aboard the Challenger in 1986. And now seven more have died aboard the Columbia."

Scientists in their rational minds reject all such notions of jinxes, bad omens and superstition. But I remembered when, as Roving Editor for Reader’s Digest, I was among those who might have been selected "the first journalist in space." Scientists like other human beings have emotions, and I would today feel uneasy stepping on board a third shuttle with a name such as the U.S.S. Jimmy Carter.

"One good thing about this," I told her. "We’ll probably never have a shuttle or other American spaceship named after Bill or Hillary Clinton."

Nor should we. The Clinton Administration did more than gut America’s defense budgets and devastate our military as no foreign enemy has ever done, tempting terrorists to exploit our weakness.

Presidents Bill and Hillary did more than choke off America’s intelligence budget, greatly reducing our ability to detect what potential enemies were preparing to do to our World Trade Center and Pentagon. Bill and Hillary Clinton deserve a large share of responsibility for the destruction of the World Trade Center and the deaths of more than 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001.

The Clintons also targeted NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, for massive budget cuts. They left our space program so damaged that American companies turned instead to Communist China to launch their satellites – and in the process apparently transferred vast amounts of classified rocket technology know-how to China’s ruling Red Army.

Communist China thereafter, of course, rewarded the Clintons by buying America’s Democratic Party with many brown paper bags filled with millions of dollars in cash. Today, as a result, we should regard the Democrats no longer as an "American" political party, but as the wholly-owned subsidiary of a foreign power.

But what share of blame should the Clintons bear for Saturday’s tragic loss of space shuttle Columbia and its brave crew?

By 1995 the Federal Government’s General Accounting Office (GAO) had begun what would be repeated warnings that Draconian Clinton cuts in NASA’s shuttle workforce budget could pose risks by overworking those who maintain, repair and fly the shuttle fleet. GAO noted a serious lack of needed NASA shuttle professionals in avionics, mechanical engineering and computer systems.

"The shuttle requires an awful lot of nursing," warned Charles Vick, space analyst for the Federation of American Scientists, noting that the GAO "says the potential for failure is still staring us in the face."

In the Clintons’ and Vice President Al Gore’s eagerness to cut America’s muscle at NASA so that taxpayer money could be redistributed to buy Democratic votes, the shuttle program plummeted from 3,000 federal workers in 1995 to only 1,800 in early 2000, when NASA’s hemorrhage was put on hold lest it become an election issue against Gore and the Democratic Party.

Under Clinton management, shuttle missions slowed to a trickle….except when one was needed to bribe Ohio Senator and former astronaut John Glenn with a free ride back into space as payment for Glenn’s obstruction of Senate investigation and impeachment proceedings against President Clinton. Defective missions to Mars and the Moon were evidence of the mess created at NASA by Clinton operatives and policies.

Since Clinton’s departure, the damage left in his wake is taking time to repair. NASA’s accounting of taxpayer money was left in a "shambles," almost impossible to audit by either GAO or the private auditing firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers because NASA officials from the Clinton days have not provided auditors with needed documentation.

The International Space Station (ISS), where three space pioneers remain at risk as this is written, cost U.S. taxpayers at least $35 billion more than promised – despite Clinton Administration reductions in its proposed size and capacity that make the current space station unable to house most of the tools to do what scientists wanted it for.

Under the Clinton Administration, the Space Station became a black hole for money, sucking it not only out of taxpayer pockets but also out of the budgets of many other NASA missions and, the GAO has continued to warn, out of the budget to keep the space shuttle operating safely. Clinton NASA budget numbers for the ISS proved to be "not credible."

Were the Clintons in significant measure responsible for the downfall of both Shuttle Columbia and, in a larger sense, NASA? Yes. The apparent Clinton agenda was to weaken all those things that made America strong.

Ironically, NASA should be downsized – or, better, completely privatized. NASA, despite the dedication and heroic efforts of thousands of its workers and astronauts, is a socialist institution. The wonder is that the Clintons did not love it more.

By its very nature, NASA monopolization of space for government is a violation of the deepest pioneering, free enterprise values of America.

What sane person wants to see the Moon, Mars – indeed the whole human future as we migrate into outer space – undertaken on NASA’s socialist model?

Russia, with its eagerness to sell private tourist tickets to the Space Station, has been more capitalistic than has America. NASA has tried to allocate space bureaucratically and politically, with precious shuttle seats given over the years to key lawmakers such as Senator Jake Garn (R.-Utah), now-Senator Bill Nelson (D.-Fla.) and Senator John Glenn (D.-Ohio). This column has discussed NASA’s socialism regarding both the Space Station and the future of the Moon and Mars.

As to the courageous astronauts who lost their lives Saturday aboard Columbia – could they have been victims of attack or terrorism? One of these heroes was the first Israeli in space, who saved us all by taking part in Israel’s preemption of the French Osirak nuclear reactor being built near Baghdad in 1981. This seems highly unlikely. In theory, however, heat-shield tiles on the underside of the Space Shuttle might have been tampered with.

And in theory, at least one foreign nation has weaponry that could have struck the Shuttle 200,000 feet above the Earth. This is Communist China, which has developed giant laser cannon designed to destroy or blind American military satellites, including the Global Positioning Satellites whose signals are now used to direct our cruise missiles to their targets. While a visible light beam from such cannon – fired from, e.g., a Chinese Cosco cargo ship along the West Coast – might be seen or photographed, the lasing technique can also be used to generate powerful beams of invisible energy such as microwaves. But the Peoples Republic of China has little or no motive – and certainly no reason to risk being detected – in this case.

The likely explanation is the one on which scientists are already focusing: that a corrupted left wing led to Columbia’s destruction. (Historians may someday find that the same thing destroyed America’s great, free eagle.)

As to these seven heroes, how best can we honor them? Such pioneers have always been the best among us. We should honor them by continuing and expanding space exploration, and by freeing it from government monopoly.

In the wake of Challenger’s explosion, we honored those seven astronauts by naming a "planet" for each of them – a memorial that will last many thousands of years wherever humans retain the current global naming system. These "planets" were seven asteroids circling the sun in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. The seven heroes of Columbia deserve the same long-lasting memorial – in global records and in our hearts.

President Bush seemed to say as much by quoting the Bible’s Book of Isaiah: "Lift your eyes and look to the heavens. Who created all these? He who brings out the starry hosts one by one, and calls them each by name. Because of His great power and mighty strength, not one of them is missing."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Ponte hosts national radio talk show Monday through Friday Noon-2 PM Eastern Time (9-11 AM Pacific Time) as well as on Saturdays 6-9 PM Eastern Time (3-6 PM Pacific Time) and on Sundays 9-11 PM Eastern Time (6-8 PM Pacific Time) on the Talk America network . Internet Audio worldwide is at TalkAmerica.com. The show's live call-in number is (888) 822-8255. A professional speaker, he is a former Roving Editor for Reader's Digest.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: SJackson
Clinton blame aside, here is the real point of the article:

Ironically, NASA should be downsized – or, better, completely privatized. NASA, despite the dedication and heroic efforts of thousands of its workers and astronauts, is a socialist institution. The wonder is that the Clintons did not love it more.

By its very nature, NASA monopolization of space for government is a violation of the deepest pioneering, free enterprise values of America.

What sane person wants to see the Moon, Mars – indeed the whole human future as we migrate into outer space – undertaken on NASA’s socialist model?

21 posted on 02/03/2003 8:06:23 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
As much as I dislike Clinton and do blame him for the security/intelligence failures and the like that lead up to September 11, I can not justify blaming him for this tragedy.

During Clinton's administration we had a GOP congress that continued to cut NASA's budget. Both sides of the political aisle have used money earmarked for space research for other pet projects.

From all indications, the Challenger and Columbia accidents were caused by mechanical failures of some kind. That is where the blame lies, not on any one person.
22 posted on 02/03/2003 8:07:39 AM PST by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Nor should we. The Clinton Administration did more than gut America’s defense budgets and devastate our military as no foreign enemy has ever done, tempting terrorists to exploit our weakness. Presidents Bill and Hillary did more than choke off America’s intelligence budget, greatly reducing our ability to detect what potential enemies were preparing to do to our World Trade Center and Pentagon. Bill and Hillary Clinton deserve a large share of responsibility for the destruction of the World Trade Center and the deaths of more than 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001.

You're darn tootin!!

23 posted on 02/03/2003 8:08:15 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
There's an entropy at NASA that has been steady and prevelant since the middle of the Apollo program. Despite all the talk of "America's love affair with the space program," it hasn't really fired the imagination of the nation since Apollo 11. Budget reductions (in comparable dollars) have gone on since the Nixon Admistration, and maybe that's justified since the space program through the Apollo program was involved in a "race" to the moon. Once we'd won the race, the fevered pitch of space exploration subsided, understandably.

But inspite of insipid declarations from previous Administrations (wasn't it George H.W. Bush who set the goal of sending a manned mission to Mars?), space has not been a high priority for any Administration since Lyndon Johnson's. Perhaps George W. Bush should consider what the nation's goals are in space and rededicate the nation to a clear mission.

24 posted on 02/03/2003 10:03:31 AM PST by My2Cents ("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"NASA knew from the second day of Columbia's 16-day research mission that a piece of the insulating foam on the external fuel tank had peeled off just after liftoff and struck the left wing, possibly ripping off some of the tiles that keep the ship from burning up when it re-enters Earth's atmosphere." http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030203-87326768.htm

http://ltp.arc.nasa.gov/space/team/journals/katnik/sts87-12-23.html
"Damage numbering up to forty tiles is considered normal on each mission due to ice dropping off of the external tank (ET) and plume re-circulation causing this debris to impact with the tiles. But the extent of damage at the conclusion of this mission was not "normal."

The pattern of hits did not follow aerodynamic expectations, and the number, size and severity of hits were abnormal. Three hundred and eight hits were counted during the inspection, one-hundred and thirty two (132) were greater than one inch. Some of the hits measured fifteen (15) inches long with depths measuring up to one and one-half (1 1/2) inches. Considering that the depth of the tile is two (2) inches, a 75% penetration depth had been reached. Over one hundred (100) tiles have been removed from the Columbia because they were irreparable.

During the STS-87 mission, there was a change made on the
external tank. Because of NASA's goal to use environmentally
friendly products, a new method of "foaming" the external tank
had been used for this mission and the STS-86 mission. It is
suspected that large amounts of foam separated from the external
tank and impacted the orbiter. This caused significant damage to
the protective tiles of the orbiter."



http://www.arnold.af.mil/aedc/newsreleases/1999/99-041.htm
"According to NASA, during several previous Space Shuttle flights, including the shuttle launched Nov. 29, 1998, the shuttle external tank experienced a significant loss of foam from the intertank. The material lost caused damage to the thermal protection high-temperature tiles on the lower surface of the shuttle orbiter.

Although the AEDC Tunnel A tests did not replicate the in-flight failures, they did provide detailed measurements to better understand the flight environment and fundamental failure mode. From these tests, NASA determined the failure is caused principally by foam cell expansion due to external heating at approximately Mach 4 combined with pressure change and aerodynamic shear. Specialized miniature shear gages and other instrumentation were installed during the test to measure these forces."

25 posted on 02/03/2003 10:33:45 AM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
Fact: The Rats are already trying to pin the blame on the current administration. This type of article is a must to combat such skullduggery.
26 posted on 02/03/2003 11:28:07 AM PST by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; XBob; RadioAstronomer

bump


27 posted on 09/27/2004 12:55:35 PM PDT by snopercod ("I'm so proud to be a part of this great mass deception" --Frank Zappa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny; PatrickHenry; longshadow; Physicist
Scientists in their rational minds reject all such notions of jinxes, bad omens and superstition.

To a degree. :-)

I remember on a second must not fail launch (the first one failed), it became almost taboo to shave about 4 weeks prior to launch. The whole flight team, including managers, were sporting a Van Dyke! LOL!

p.s. The launch and subsequent mission was a success.

28 posted on 09/27/2004 1:23:24 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Thanks for the bump. :-)


29 posted on 09/27/2004 1:25:42 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

I understand that the newest NASA budget has gone up a bit, and I think I've read that some of their funds are being shifted from the shuttle program to other areas of research -- basic research. Not a bad idea, really. The shuttle is old stuff.


30 posted on 09/27/2004 1:31:37 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (I'm PatrickHenry and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Today, as a result, we should regard the Democrats no longer as an "American" political party, but as the wholly-owned subsidiary of a foreign power."

This has been true for the last 50 years at least.

31 posted on 09/27/2004 1:47:36 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
If Bush can be blamed for the Hurricanes in Florida why not make Clintoon responsible for the NASA failure?
32 posted on 09/27/2004 1:48:48 PM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Dan Goldin gets my nod as The Biggest Cause of NASA's recent problems. He was appointed by Bush I in April, '92, and was a noted Clinton butt-boy through that administration. He finally left in November, 2001, having left behind him the scattered debris of his "faster, better, cheaper" approach.


33 posted on 09/27/2004 1:52:12 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

It isn't just Clinton who shares responsibility for the incoherency of NASA's programs that resulted in the Algore Earthsat. Every President from Nixon on was involved. Dubya has finally restored coherency to NASA, but you need to be a systems analyst to understand what NASA is today. Equal blame can go to Congress as a whole--the monstrous committee. Sagan can have the rest of the blame.


34 posted on 09/27/2004 1:55:14 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

It's not socialism. However, the state should ennable private enterprise rather than compete with it.


35 posted on 09/27/2004 1:58:45 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Scientists in their rational minds reject all such notions of jinxes, bad omens and superstition.

Legend has it that Niels Bohr kept a horseshoe on his office wall. When asked why it was there, he would say that it was for luck. When the questioner would inevitably object that Prof. Bohr surely didn't believe in such a superstition, Bohr would reply that that was of no consequence, as he had been assured that it would work whether he believed in it or not.

36 posted on 09/27/2004 2:00:22 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
Sorry, but you can't lay the blame on Clinton for this one. Bush has been president for over two years.

On the contrary. Increased budgeting doesn't mean immediate results. Then, there's the lag time with the Algor
voter-friendly foam.

In any case, Clinton does deserve a great deal of blame for with the space program, helping the Chicoms, bribing Glenn to
derail accountability, etc.

That's not to mention his whoring for votes. The guy never stopped campaigning.

Yes, NASA is a government bureaucracy.

Oh, and didn't Bush-41 appoint the NASA chief Dan Goldin who was quite content to let most of the agency's problems fester?

Plenty of blame to go around.

37 posted on 09/27/2004 2:34:46 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson