Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did environmentalism bring down Columbia?(engineer pleaded for presidential order to halt flights)
worldnetdaily ^ | 2/3/2993 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 02/03/2003 5:52:06 AM PST by TLBSHOW

Did environmentalism bring down Columbia? NASA probed exact same glitch of insulation striking tiles in 1997

By Joseph Farah

More than six years ago, NASA investigated extensive thermal tile damage on the space shuttle Columbia as a result of the shedding of external tank insulation on launch – now a prime suspect in the Columbia's disastrous disintegration upon re-entry yesterday.

The problems began when the space agency switched to materials and parts that were considered more "environmentally friendly," according to a NASA report obtained by WorldNetDaily.

Did concerns for environment cause shuttle disaster?

NASA investigators have quickly focused on the possibility that Columbia's thermal tiles were damaged far more seriously than the space agency realized during liftoff. Just a little over a minute into Columbia's launch Jan. 16, a chunk of insulating foam peeled away from the external fuel tank and smashed into the left wing, which like the rest of the shuttle is covered with tiles to protect the ship from the extreme heat of re-entry into the atmosphere. Yesterday, that same wing started exhibiting sensor failures and other problems 23 minutes before Columbia was scheduled to touch down. With just 16 minutes to go before landing, the shuttle disintegrated over Texas killing all seven in the crew.

In 1997, during the 87th space shuttle mission, similar tile damage was done during launch when the external tank foam crashed into them during the stress of takeoff. NASA knows that problem occurred again on this Columbia launch. However, the agency is not certain this was the cause of the disintegration of the craft upon re-entry.

"Immediately after the Columbia rolled to a stop, the inspection crews began the process of the post-flight inspection," wrote NASA's Greg Katnik in a review of the problems of that 1997 flight. "As soon as the orbiter was approached, light spots in the tiles were observed indicating that there had been significant damage to the tiles. The tiles do a fantastic job of repelling heat, however they are very fragile and susceptible to impact damage. Damage numbering up to forty tiles is considered normal on each mission due to ice dropping off of the external tank (ET) and plume re-circulation causing this debris to impact with the tiles. But the extent of damage at the conclusion of this mission was not 'normal.'"

The alarming report continued: "The pattern of hits did not follow aerodynamic expectations, and the number, size and severity of hits were abnormal. Three hundred and eight hits were counted during the inspection, one-hundred and thirty two (132) were greater than one inch. Some of the hits measured fifteen (15) inches long with depths measuring up to one and one-half (1 1/2) inches. Considering that the depth of the tile is two (2) inches, a 75% penetration depth had been reached. Over one hundred (100) tiles have been removed from the Columbia because they were irreparable. The inspection revealed the damage, now the 'detective process' began."

NASA investigators seven years ago noted that the damage followed changes in the methods of "foaming" the external tank – changes mandated by concerns about being "environmentally friendly."

"During the STS-87 mission, there was a change made on the external tank," said the report. "Because of NASA's goal to use environmentally friendly products, a new method of 'foaming' the external tank had been used for this mission and the STS-86 mission. It is suspected that large amounts of foam separated from the external tank and impacted the orbiter. This caused significant damage to the protective tiles of the orbiter."

NASA's report on that earlier Columbia flight concluded on a positive note, suggesting changes would be made in procedures to avoid such problems at launches in the future.

"As this investigation continues, I am very comfortable that the questions will be answered and the solutions applied," wrote Katnik. "In fact, some of the solutions are already in progress. At present the foam on the sides of the tank is being sanded down to the nominal minimum thickness. This removes the outer surface, which is tougher than the foam core, and lessens the amount of foam that can separate and hit the orbiter."

This 6-year-old problem is sure to raise new concerns about NASA's safety procedures. Already, new public concern is focusing on a former NASA engineer who pleaded last summer for a presidential order to halt all further shuttle flights until safety issues had been addressed.

In a letter to the White House, Don Nelson, who served with NASA for 36 years until he retired in 1999, wrote to President George W. Bush warning that his "intervention" was necessary to "prevent another catastrophic space shuttle accident."

During his last 11 years at NASA, Nelson served as a mission operations evaluator for proposed advanced space transportation projects. He was on the initial design team for the space shuttle. He participated in every shuttle upgrade until his retirement.

Listing a series of mishaps with shuttle missions since 1999, Nelson warned in his letter that NASA management and the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel have failed to respond to the growing warning signs of another shuttle accident, reported the London Observer. Since 1999 the vehicle had experienced a number of potentially disastrous problems:

1999 – Columbia's launch was delayed by a hydrogen leak and Discovery was grounded with damaged wiring, contaminated engine and dented fuel line;

January 2000 – Endeavor was delayed because of wiring and computer failures;

August 2000 – inspection of Columbia revealed 3,500 defects in wiring;

October 2000 – the 100th flight of the shuttle was delayed because of a misplaced safety pin and concerns with the external tank;

April 2002 – a hydrogen leak forced the cancellation of the Atlantis flight;

July 2002 – the inspector general reported that the shuttle safety programme was not properly managed;

August 2002 – the shuttle launch system was grounded after fuel line cracks were discovered. Yesterday, Nelson told the London Observer that he feared the Columbia disaster was the culmination of "disastrous mismanagement" by NASA's most senior officials and would inevitably lead to a moratorium on future flights. "I became concerned about safety issues in NASA after Challenger," he said. "I think what happened is that very slowly over the years NASA's culture of safety became eroded. But when I tried to raise my concerns with NASA's new administrator, I received two reprimands for not going through the proper channels, which discouraged other people from coming forward with their concerns. When it came to an argument between a middle-ranking engineer and the astronauts and administration, guess who won."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: environmentalism; spaceshuttle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2003 5:52:07 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Sounds plausible to me.
2 posted on 02/03/2003 6:09:19 AM PST by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
The environmentalists don't give a $hit whether or not their suggested changes caused the crash or not just so long as some owl or minnow was saved, the astronauts on the other hand were/are expendable in their eyes.
3 posted on 02/03/2003 6:12:55 AM PST by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichardW
August 25, 2002

Office of the President of the United States
Mr. George W. Bush
Subject: Executive Order for a Moratorium on Space Shuttle Flight
Mr. President,
I am a recently retired NASA aerospace engineer and it is my duty to inform you that our space shuttle astronauts are in eminent danger. Your intervention is required to prevent another catastrophic space shuttle accident. NASA management and the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel have failed to respond to the growing warning signs of another shuttle accident. Since 1999 the launch system has experienced the following potential disastrous occurrences:
July 1999 - Space Shuttle Columbia delayed by hydrogen leak.
December 1999 - Space Shuttle Discovery was grounded with damaged wiring, contaminated engine, dented fuel line, and paper work errors.
January 2000 - Space Shuttle Endeavor is delayed because of wiring and computer failures.
March 2000 - Space Shuttle Atlantis main engine must be replaced because of paperwork errors.
August 2000 - Inspection of Space Shuttle Columbia reveals 3,500 defects in wiring. Wiring defects plague entire fleet.
October 2000 - The 100th flight of the space shuttle was delayed because of a misplaced safety pin and concerns with the external tank.
April 2001 - NASA failed to keep adequate watch on safety operations of a major contractor.
July 2002 - The inspector general reports that space shuttle safety program not properly managed.
April 2002 - Hydrogen leak forces scrub of the Atlantis flight.
August 2002 - Shuttle launch system grounded after fuel line cracks are discovered in all the fleet!
Mr. President, as you are painfully aware NASA management has been lacking for a number of years. Unfortunately, your new NASA Administrator has failed to recognize the eminent space shuttle danger and has accepted the consul of the pre-existing NASA shuttle management. These managers still pursue a management philosophy that has stagnated the safety upgrades efforts and perpetuates the staggering launch costs.
The space shuttle or any space transportation vehicle without crew escape modules will never be safe to transport humans. To incorporate crew escape modules in the space shuttle requires that the piloting function be removed from the vehicle. Unfortunately, the background of the shuttle management is that of former flight controllers and astronauts. They have been trained to never trust automated flight control systems. Therefore, they are adamantly opposed to automation of the space shuttle. Efforts by NASA engineers and contractors to automate the shuttles are met with stern rebukes and reprimands in some cases.
Mr. President, to prevent another shuttle disaster it is requested that an Executive Order be issued that places a moratorium on space shuttle operations. This moratorium must limit shuttle missions to flight crews that do not exceed four members. The moratorium must remain in effect until crew escape modules can be incorporated.
This moratorium will serve as a catalyst to kick-start the resisting NASA management into action. The lives of our astronauts and the future of our space program must not be ignored. The warning from the Thiokol engineer was ignored and the Challenger exploded. The terrorist training warning from FBI agents was ignored and we had the 9-11 disaster. When the next shuttle explodes...and Murphy’s Law says it will, we can exclaim with pride a loud "YES!" as the crew escape module carries our astronauts to safety... or if this moratorium is ignored...we can watch in horror and shame as the astronauts face certain death.

Don A. Nelson
Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer


Reply from the President's OSTP: "I do not think that it is appropriate for the President to issue a moratorium on

Space Shuttle launches at this time" Dec. 4 2002.

Comment: Dec. 12, 2002 another Shuttle propellant leak found!

Don A. Nelson

NASAProblems.com

http://www.nasaproblems.com/
4 posted on 02/03/2003 6:15:44 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
the letter and reply
5 posted on 02/03/2003 6:34:41 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
the information is all out there as you know from the other night here at FR
6 posted on 02/03/2003 6:42:37 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
There should be hell to pay if envirowacks and their "pet peeves" caused the tragic deaths of seven of the world's most brilliant and accomplished people.
7 posted on 02/03/2003 6:46:29 AM PST by Marauder (Spare us from environmentalist wackos ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
In a letter to the White House, Don Nelson, who served with NASA for 36 years until he retired in 1999, wrote to President George W. Bush warning that his "intervention" was necessary to "prevent another catastrophic space shuttle accident."

Too bad that Don Nelson's warning letter apparently fell on deaf ears.

8 posted on 02/03/2003 6:53:13 AM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HELLRAISER II
The environmentalists don't give a $hit whether or not their suggested changes caused the crash or not just so long as some owl or minnow was saved, the astronauts on the other hand were/are expendable in their eyes.

It's actually not even that simple. EPA folks are largely mid-level types with no practical understanding of materials and process engineering. They make vague pronouncements about material substuitution and then require industries to simply prove their cockamamie opinions and platitudes incorrect.

9 posted on 02/03/2003 6:53:23 AM PST by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Reply from the President's OSTP:

"I do not think that it is appropriate for the President to issue a moratorium on

10 posted on 02/03/2003 7:12:12 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Just a little over a minute into Columbia's launch Jan. 16, a chunk of insulating foam peeled away from the external fuel tank and smashed into the left wing, which like the rest of the shuttle is covered with tiles to protect the ship from the extreme heat of re-entry into the atmosphere

I think it is important to investigate this foam issue

But has it been determined wheather it was foam or ice that fell off??

11 posted on 02/03/2003 7:32:37 AM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Did you see the picture with the rip?
12 posted on 02/03/2003 7:35:49 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What picture??
13 posted on 02/03/2003 7:38:47 AM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/834673/posts?page=

14 posted on 02/03/2003 7:45:06 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Does he mean "eminent" the two places in the letter he uses the word?Not trying to be a pain here,but,misuse of the language tends to reduce my respect for people who are making expert commentary.If this is proper use,then,I stand corrected.
15 posted on 02/03/2003 7:45:24 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yonif
PING
16 posted on 02/03/2003 8:00:21 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John W
The correct word should be "imminent," meaning close at hand.

"Eminent" means exalted and/or important.

You are correct about usage and the impression it leaves on others.

17 posted on 02/03/2003 8:04:16 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
where did that picture come from .. that is the first I have ever seen that
18 posted on 02/03/2003 8:09:53 AM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Dude, that's not a picture of a wing.
19 posted on 02/03/2003 8:11:39 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I just read this story. Unbelievable!

My computer has been down so that's why I haven't been pestering everyone. Ha!
20 posted on 02/03/2003 10:04:02 PM PST by Salvation (+With God all things are possible.+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson