Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A rescue of the crew was unlikely
Washington Times ^ | 2/03/03 | Marcia Dunn, AP

Posted on 02/02/2003 11:38:27 PM PST by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:00:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: Bobby777; Trust but Verify
Knock it off.
82 posted on 02/03/2003 3:58:12 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
thank you ... wasn't interested in it in the first place ...
83 posted on 02/03/2003 4:00:41 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
I did find several other missions that had landing weights from about 200,000 to 220,000 pounds for other orbiters. I also found a Columbia flight that came back essentially empty at 220,000 pounds. The Double Spacehab weighed almost 30,000 pounds, possible putting the landing weight of this mission at 250,000 pounds? That would make this the highest weight reentry ever, and the hottest.

If NASA had recognized this problem in time, I wonder if they would have been able to disconnect and abandon the Spacehab module and any other useless weight before reentry.

84 posted on 02/04/2003 11:15:51 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Possibly, I don't know if its bolted in or on some sort of piros.

Here's some better numbers:

Landing weight of sts107 = 232788 (from another freeper)
sts96 = 219890
sts98 = 198909
STS-99: 225,669
STS-97: 227,780
STS-50: 228,127

Unless there has been a heavier reentry I couldn't find, STS107 was subjected to about 6% more heat load than any other Shuttle in the history of the program. Other Shuttle flights may have been far more tolerant of any tile damage than this one.

Jan 16th was perfect for ice formation, low 40s 100%RH.
85 posted on 02/04/2003 1:07:18 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson