Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A racist rant too far? Police investigate Taki the playboy pundit
Independent ^ | 01 February 2003 | By Sholto Byrnes

Posted on 02/02/2003 6:29:22 PM PST by gd124

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Cresida Dick and the Diversity Directorate strike again!
1 posted on 02/02/2003 6:29:23 PM PST by gd124
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gd124
Criminal charges for something like this are ridiculous.

That said, I'm hard-pressed to find anything I like about Taki. On top of being an a-hole and not nearly as bright as he likes to imagine himself, If he's not actually a fascist he's skating awfully close to it.
2 posted on 02/02/2003 6:37:34 PM PST by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
Well, I'm sure most Freepers agree with him about Hillary.
3 posted on 02/02/2003 6:37:38 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
Wow! Taki sure has a way with the pen! Slash and burn writing...reminds me of Ann C. I like what I read because it's very un-pc.

Go for it Taki!
4 posted on 02/02/2003 6:37:42 PM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124; Cicero; kms61
The author of the piece seems to assume that pointing out negative characteristics of racial groups is automatically racist. This is the height of political correctness. Racism is not observing group characteristics, or perhaps even being wrong about them, but rather it is when one assumes that some individual, merely because of his race, must have certain characteristics (usually negative). For example, it is well established that there are IQ differences between races, i.e., that all members of the group taken together average differently than all members of some other group. Is saying this racist? I don't think so. But if you said, there is a black person, he has a lower intelligence, you might be factually wrong or right, but you would certainly have made a racist remark if the comment were based on nothing other than his race.
5 posted on 02/02/2003 6:45:59 PM PST by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kms61
I see racist remarks here, but I'm missing anything nearing fasc
ism. Please point out where he says anything fascist.
6 posted on 02/02/2003 6:49:27 PM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gd124
The Yard's Diversity Directorate

The 'Yard' might have been re-structured under the Ministry of Silly Thoughts (or Minithought in Newspeak) and Britain may be soon become yet another one of those boingo-boingo democracies.

7 posted on 02/02/2003 6:51:02 PM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
Thank God for the Bill of Rights. Poor Britain - a pathetic police state.
8 posted on 02/02/2003 6:51:41 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
Taki is just a jester who offends everyone if you give him enough time and ink. So now the UK is going to prosecute clowns for telling ethnic jokes. He's also knocked Jews though I didn't see it in the article.
9 posted on 02/02/2003 6:58:01 PM PST by dennisw (http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php <AND> http://rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
Scotland Yard swings its resources into action.

Meanwhile, the Yard recently announced that it will no longer bother to even investigate most burglaries.

Glad to see the Brits have there priorities straight!

10 posted on 02/02/2003 6:58:50 PM PST by TheConservator (Homines libenter quod volunt credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
This person I've never heard of but he does at least have the balls to say what he believes is true . Perhaps some tact is in order ?

" You name it I'm guilty of it " bump .

11 posted on 02/02/2003 6:59:05 PM PST by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
Nothing like primary sources. From the Spectator of January 11, here it is:

Thoughts on thuggery

Taki

GSTAAD-It seems almost obscene to be sitting in bucolic Gstaad rubbing it in, but boy, oh boy, was Enoch — God rest his soul — ever right! Now there’s a man who was tough on the causes of crime long before crime had been Blaired. Or Strawed. Or Blunketted. What a bunch of bullshitters. Britain is being mugged by black hoodlums, people are being cut down in the streets à la Mogadishu in the early Nineties, and these clowns are passing a Bill which will put the poor little Greek boy in jail if I dare to defend Slobodan Milosevic (which I do, by the way).

It doesn’t take an extremely high IQ to figure out that the two girls who were shot in Birmingham were killed because a member of their family belonged to a rival gang. Nor does it take a genius to conclude that turf wars between mostly black gangs are fought over the control of drugs, mainly crack cocaine. Finally, only a moron would not surmise that what politically correct newspapers refer to as ‘disaffected young people’ are black thugs, sons of black thugs and grandsons of black thugs, in it for the money.

But let’s lighten up a bit. If you thought comedy was dead, what about Blunkett instructing Woolf to instruct the judges to use community penalties against violent criminals rather than sending the poor dears to do a Taki? This only six weeks ago. What a bunch of yo-yos! Talk about a gang that can’t shoot straight. If they had any shame, they would invite the hoodlums to take over the government, and I’m willing to bet my last euro that things would improve. At least we’d have some law and order. The trouble is if they did that, they’d all have to go on welfare, as none of them are capable of earning a living except in the bullshit business.

Writing in the Mail, Melanie Phillips, a good writer who knows her stuff, refers to the hoodlums as lacking self-esteem because of their shattered emotional backgrounds. I remember tens of millions whose backgrounds were shattered during the war — by rape, murder and pillage — who did not turn to crime but managed to live useful lives. No, the problem is not lack of self-esteem, a trick word used as often as racism. It’s being given something for nothing. It’s the welfare state. The socialist creed. The compassionate society. The bullshit society. West Indians were allowed to immigrate after the war, multiply like flies, and then the great state apparatus took over the care of their multiplications. The Rivers of Blood speech by Enoch was prophetic as well as true, and look what the bullshitters of the time did to the great man.

But back to bucolic Switzerland. One of the reasons it remains so is that when Taki backs his brand-new yellow mini into a tree, Taki is hauled off to explain. Zero tolerance is strictly applied in good old Helvetia, and I’m all for it, even if it doesn’t suit me late at night. And speaking of yellow minis against trees, I never realised how much publicity is generated when someone is questioned by the fuzz. The top diarist in America, Richard Johnson, writing on Page Six mentioned my last week’s column, then Washington picked it up, followed by El-Lay and the rest. By backing into a tree, I got countless mentions of my magazine, the American Conservative, which gives me food for thought.

I know a publicity-addicted woman by the name of Rena Sindi in New York. Last year the Sunday Telegraph mentioned her when her name appeared on the best-dressed list. ‘Who in heaven’s name is Rena Sindi?’ wrote the diarist. It was a good point. Well, I’ll tell you. She’s an Iraqi-born woman in her mid-thirties, recently divorced from a Saudi. She’s not a bad girl at all, actually quite kind, but her problem is she loves publicity about as much as I love the Wehrmacht. She gives parties which are paid for by sponsors; but I thought she should have disqualified herself after 9/11 because of her background. To the contrary. She even published a book on how to throw parties someone else pays for. Rena, take a plane to Switzerland, get a yellow mini, back it into a tree rather hard, and then wait for the fuzz at home. You’ll have all the publicity you have ever wished for.

But I digress. The snow is finally here, the sun is shining, and I’m off on a chopper for some high-mountain skiing. And, kidding aside, I do feel for the good English people back in England. I remember when England used to feel like Switzerland. That’s before the bullshitters took over.

There it is. Enemy of the people? Your call.
12 posted on 02/02/2003 6:59:09 PM PST by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
If anyone wants more Taki he's in Pat Buchannan's new magazine.

http://www.amconmag.com/01_27_03/taki.html
13 posted on 02/02/2003 7:01:01 PM PST by dennisw (http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php <AND> http://rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
That Taki column is quite mild. And the UK wants to make this a hanging offence?
14 posted on 02/02/2003 7:03:21 PM PST by dennisw (http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php <AND> http://rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gd124
Free Taki!
15 posted on 02/02/2003 7:04:34 PM PST by GermanBabies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kms61
Taki is no Fascist. Fascists believe in the option of state ownership of the means of production, or the corporate state. Taki believes in Taki Control of everything.

Taki is just a really funny guy who thought he could play tennis and polo. His "athletic" exploits are on the same level as doing Olympic Alpine Events for Guatemala. But hey, as we age our youthful exploits improve, sorta like wine.

He has the incredibly annoying gift of being really obnoxious in a faux-charming way and being right almost all the time. It would be a real bummer if this shameless sophisticated snob were arrested for free speech, while the courts of Britain are doing away with jail time for armed burglars.

BTW, Enoch Powell was right, too. Unfortunately, he was so obnoxious he makes Taki look like Jesus. Gave common-sense immigration laws a bad name, the silly bastard.

16 posted on 02/02/2003 7:10:44 PM PST by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
>>Taki is just a really funny guy <<

Well, his stuff is supposed to be shocking, but it's pretty tame by American standards.

This whole shock value thing was picked over by Lenny Bruce in the 1950's and kept alive by Howards Stern (who, FTR, I cannot stand).

How sad to live in a country where there is no 1st Amendment. I hope this is kept front and center when we go ghe next round with the PC leftists.
17 posted on 02/02/2003 7:23:40 PM PST by freedumb2003 (God bless and keep the astonauts' families - the astronauts are already with Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jane
Some of the other things he's said/written are pretty close to fascism, IMO. I should have made myself clearer. In the piece cited he may not be making fascist statements, he's just being typically obnoxious.

Maybe I'm missing something here, but I still don't see any reason why I should particularly CARE what Taki thinks on any given issue.

He has a knack for throwing barbs, but I see few if any original ideas in his writings, nor does he seem to have any accomplishments that would render him an authority on anything important.
18 posted on 02/02/2003 7:30:40 PM PST by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kms61
But is that a criminal offense?
19 posted on 02/02/2003 7:38:22 PM PST by BnBlFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
I have read his stuff, from the Specie, going on 9 yrs, and he has gone off the deep end.He loathes Israel, is soft on Saddam, and has as much brainpower as PJB.He deserves all he gets.

Taki is an asshole, and the worst sort of reactionary.
20 posted on 02/02/2003 7:38:27 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson