Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would you have supported this? Gun Control
From the Joey Bishop Show ^ | June 18, 1968 | Charlton Heston

Posted on 02/02/2003 5:56:41 PM PST by FSPress

Here are some to the same arguments that we hear today about guns. This was a plea that helped establish the Gun Control Act of 1967. Stop and Think. Would you have supported this legislation? The person who spoke the words is today a defender of the second amendment.

TWO WEEKS AGO, ROBERT F. KENNEDY BECAME ONE OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS STRUCK DOWN BY AN ASSASSIN'S BULLET. SOMETIME TODAY, IN SOME CITY IN AMERICA, A GUN SHOT WILL RING OUT AND SOMEONE ELSE WILL FALL DEAD OR WOUNDED. THE VICTIM MAY BE A PUBLIC LEADER OR A PRIVATE CITIZEN, BUT, WHOEVER HE IS AND WHEREVER HE FALLS, HE IS NOT ONLY THE VICTIM OF THE GUNMAN....HE IS THE VICTIM OF INDIFFERENCE. THE TRAGEDY IS STARK AND REAL. THE SCARS LAST FOREVER, AND THE ULTIMATE AND SENSELESS HORROR IS THAT SO MUCH OF THIS SLAUGHTER COULD BE PREVENTED. OUR GUN CONTROL LAWS ARE SO LAX THAT ANYONE CAN BUY A WEAPON....THE MENTALLY ILL, THE CRIMINAL, THE BOY TOO YOUNG TO BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNING A DEADLY WEAPON.

THE SOUND OF THAT GUNFIRE WILL ECHO AGAIN...TOMARROW, THE DAY AFTER, AND ALL THE DAYS TO FOLLOW, UNLESS WE ACT!!! 6,300 PEOPLE ARE MURDERED EVERY YEAR WITH FIRE- ARMS IN THESE UNITED STATES. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE AND WHEN IT IS COMPARED WITH THE FAR, FAR LOWER RATES IN OTHER FREE COUNTRIES, IT IS INTOLERABLE.

LIKE MOST AMERICANS, WE SHARE THE CONVICTION THAT STRONGER GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION IS MANDATORY IN THIS TRAGIC SITUATION. WE DO NOT SPEAK FROM IGNORENCE OF FIREARMS. THE FIVE OF US COUNT OURSELVES AMONG THE MILLIONS OF AMERICANS WHO RESPECT THE PRIVILEGE OF OWNING GUNS AS SPORTSMEN OR AS PRIVATE COLLECTORS. WE HAVE USED GUNS ALL OUR LIVES BUT THE PROPER USE OF GUNS IN PRIVATE HANDS IS NOT TO KILL PEOPLE.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE CONGRESS HAS RECENTLY GIVEN US SOME PROTECTION AGAINST PISTOLS IN THE WRONG HANDS. BUT THAT'S NOT ENOUGH....NOT NEARLY ENOUGH, THE CARNAGE WILL NOT STOP UNTIL THERE IS EFFECTIVE CONTROL OVER THE SALE OF RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS.

PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY WAS MURDERED BY A RIFLE. MARTIN LUTHER KING WAS MURDERED BY A RIFLE. MEDGAR EVERS WAS MURDERED BY A RIFLE.

NOT LONG AGO, A DEMENTED SNIPER PERCHED ON A TOWER AND KILLED FOURTEEN PEOPLE IN COLD BLOOD......BY RIFLE. FOR MANY LONG MONTHS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HAS ASKED THE CONGRESS TO PASS SUCH A LAW... BUT THE CONGRESS WILL NOT LISTEN UNLESS YOU, THE VOTER, SPEAKS OUT....UNLESS THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY RISE UP AND DEMAND THAT THE CONGRESS GIVE US A STRONG AND EFFECTIVE GUN CONTROL LAW.

THE LEGISLATION HAS BEEN INTRODUCED. IN THE SENATE, IT IS S-3633. IN THE HOUSE IT IS HR-)7735.

THIS BILL IS NO MYSTERY. LET'S BE CLEAR ABOUT IT. IT'S PURPOSE IS SIMPLE AND DIRECT. IT IS NOT TO DEPRIVE THE SPORTSMAN OF HIS HUNTING GUN, THE MARKSMAN OF HIS TARGET RIFLE, NOR WOULD IT DENY TO ANY RESPONSIBLE CITIZEN HIS CONSTI- TUTIONAL RIGHT TO OWN A FIREARM. IT IS TO PREVENT THE MURDER OF AMERICANS. IT CONTAINS THREE SENSIBLE AND REALISTIC RULES.

FIRST, IT WILL OUTLAW THE MAIL ORDER SALES OF SHOTGUNS AND RIFLES. IF THIS LAW WERE IN FORCE SEVERAL YEARS AGO, IT MIGHT HAVE STOPPED LEE HARVEY OSWALD FROM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUYING THE HIGH-POWERED RIFLE HE USED TO MURDER PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY. EACH YEAR ONE MILLION RIFLES ARE SOLD THROUGH THE MAILS.

SECOND, IT WILL OUTLAW SALES OF SHOTGUNS AND RIFLES TO MINORS - PEOPLE TOO YOUNG TO BEAR THE GRAVE RESPONSIBILITY PLACED IN THE HANDS OF A GUN OWNER.

THIRD, IT WILL OUTLAW SALES OF SHOTGUNS AND RIFLES TO STRANGERS. PEOPLE WHO DRIFT ACROSS STATE LINES, TOO OFTEN WITHOUT CREDENTIALS, BUY THESE WEAPONS, AS EASILY AS THEY BUY CIGARETTES AND CANDY. THE STATES WHICH HAVE STRONG GUN CONTROL LAWS WILL BE PROTECTED.

WE URGE YOU, AS A RESPONSIBLE, SENSIBLE AND CONCERNED CITIZEN, TO WRITE OR WIRE YOUR SENATOR AND CONGRESSMAN IMMEDIATELY AND DEMAND THEY SUPPORT THESE BILLS. IN THE SENATE, IT IS BILL S-3633. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, IT IS BILL HR-17735.

IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY....IN THE NAME OF CONSCIENCE....FOR THE COMMON SAFETY OF US ALL.... FOR THE FUTURE OF AMERICA, WE MUST ACT....IT IS UP TO YOU....YOU ALONE AND THE TIME IS NOW.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; copernicus5
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
They lied to us in 1963. They lied to us in 1968. They lied to us in 1972. They lied to us in 1978. They lied to us in 1981. They lied to us in 1986. They lied to us in 1989 and they are lieing to you now!

Excellent summary!

Is that orginal to you or is there a source or link?

Best regards,

101 posted on 02/03/2003 7:12:41 PM PST by Copernicus (A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: jdege
NICS is used in EVERY firearm transfer, not just handguns, and is has just as much to do with crime as every other gun control law: NOTHING!

You are right, it is gov't revenue, though it probably does not even pay for itself, but it also is a record of every legal gun purchase. And yes, it is designed to lower handgun purchases by the hassle factor, and also long gun purchases.
103 posted on 02/03/2003 8:30:17 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: jdege
P.S. Where are you going with this?
104 posted on 02/03/2003 8:32:07 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
Are you talking to me?
105 posted on 02/03/2003 8:33:14 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: FSPress
I would rather my kid know than not, at any age.
106 posted on 02/03/2003 10:24:52 PM PST by m18436572
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
I have a very long memory when it comes to being lied too. I clearly remember each incident plus many more not mentioned here.
The last line(They lied to us and they are lying to you now!)poped into my mind as I wrote it. It came from an old motion picture about the Nazis in WWll.(The Cross of Loraine).
107 posted on 02/04/2003 4:32:46 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Blue Collar Christian
I "carbon copied" you since you seemed to be keeping up with some of these details.

It was probably unnecessarily redundant.

Best regards,

108 posted on 02/04/2003 5:21:50 AM PST by Copernicus (A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
[Are we reading the same thread?]



Are we reading the same constitution, eddie?

Guarantee of a republican form of government
Address:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/835849/posts
109 posted on 02/04/2003 6:57:16 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Are we reading the same constitution, eddie?

Heck...even those guys rarely come in 9-0.

110 posted on 02/04/2003 8:53:13 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
'Those' guys?

Don't look now eddie, but your head is up close to where you obviously store your respect for our republic.
111 posted on 02/04/2003 9:00:11 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
....your respect for our republic.

I respect the Constitution and the Supreme Court.
But obviously we don't need those guys when we can just give you a call.

So I'll ask this question:

Do you believe a law banning the anonymous sale of firearms via mail order (or online etc.) would be unconstitutional?

Not ineffective, or stupid or unnecessary or wrong headed...but unconstitutional?

112 posted on 02/04/2003 9:16:11 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Do you believe a law banning the anonymous sale of firearms via mail order (or online etc.) would be unconstitutional?
Not ineffective, or stupid or unnecessary or wrong headed...but unconstitutional?


Yes, I do, as such laws are a clear infringement on my RKBA's.
-- However, laws reasonably regulating the sale of arms to dangerous defectives & minors, -- by states/localities, would not be, imo.
Thus, it would be the responsibility of the seller to comply with such state/local law.

Prior to the '68 GCA, this was exactly the situation in the U.S. for mail order guns. It worked.
113 posted on 02/04/2003 9:35:59 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson