Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Press Conference LIVE THREAD
Fox, CNN, networks, NASA TV | February 2, 2003 | NASA

Posted on 02/02/2003 2:00:17 PM PST by snopercod

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 581-585 next last
To: Jael
environmentally friendly products

They'll kill us all before it's over.

181 posted on 02/02/2003 3:01:23 PM PST by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
Did they tell the crew about the debris that hit the wing on the ascent?
Did the crew know there could be a potential problem on re-entry?

Finally. They said the crew knew about the debris, but they were told that it was inconsequencial.

182 posted on 02/02/2003 3:01:47 PM PST by Semper911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Switching to KSC reporters...
183 posted on 02/02/2003 3:02:02 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
They are duty bound to look at everything else that might also explain the data, and doubtless the story will change as it takes form.

Yes, and I am quite willing to wait for the right answer. It will come.

184 posted on 02/02/2003 3:02:24 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

One comment this guy has made several times now, at least once yesterday and once today, it that they conisered the hit to the left wing and "didn't think" it was a problem.

He now seems rather dismissive of questions regarding inspecting or viewing the wing closely to see if there was damage.

In light of this catastrophic failure, the comment "we didn't think" it was a problem kindof leaves me cold.

If damage could have been detected before reentry, the shuttle could have used it's fuel to maintain orbit for for extra time. I believe there was another shuttle scheduled for about the third week of February. Dismissing the chance to view the shuttle using the Hubble or something else, seems carless in the extreme to me.

185 posted on 02/02/2003 3:02:32 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Jumping in here, I am greatly imprssed by Dittemore. He is giving what he can
186 posted on 02/02/2003 3:02:37 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
"why is the DOD involved?"

dunno specific reason(s), but active duty military were killed in this flight.
187 posted on 02/02/2003 3:03:56 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
This is what we did in our program. We compared the data the satellite's computers to ground 'truth' images.

We took three dumps and compared the dumps to each other and then the ground info.

Memory can take radiation hits in space and change its contents.

But I bet the shuttle's computer are much more hardened than ours.
188 posted on 02/02/2003 3:04:08 PM PST by fooman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
Perhaps the wheel and attached strut extended over California and took some sensors/wiring with it when it snapped off...

Pay attention. Read carefully. The man said that sensors in wheel well were lost in a staggered fashion, and specifically said that this happened after CA, and further, that the staggered loss of sensor indicates something other than sudden change at that moment.

189 posted on 02/02/2003 3:04:22 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Jael
I keep reading that about the tanks ..

I don't want to get the wrong impression but what does NASA mean by "environmentally friendly"
190 posted on 02/02/2003 3:04:28 PM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If damage could have been detected before reentry, the shuttle could have used it's fuel to maintain orbit for for extra time.

Nope. There is no possibilty for a recue, off this underfuned effort.

191 posted on 02/02/2003 3:04:36 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I believe there was another shuttle scheduled for about the third week of February.

I don't believe that the next shuttle was due to launch for a few months...

192 posted on 02/02/2003 3:05:27 PM PST by Rafterman1 (France! For sale, cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: All
Dittemore: "We have had conditions in the past where the vehicle has sensed an atmospheric layer, and the FCS would react to it, so those situations are normal. What is interesting is that the degree in which the elevons were trying to correct was outside of our experience."
193 posted on 02/02/2003 3:06:01 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
They make a lot of judgment calls in this business... and every one of them is risky. If they turn out to have made the wrong call here, then they will know more about it than they did before, but I am not sure that makes anyone careless.
194 posted on 02/02/2003 3:06:15 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Jael
I think that it is you that brought this up yesterday. IF, IF this were true, it would be ironic that PC kills here.
195 posted on 02/02/2003 3:06:17 PM PST by fooman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: don-o
I'm not sure why it wouldn't be possible with another shuttle going up. Please explain.
196 posted on 02/02/2003 3:06:42 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
"Oh, another good question: Why were military satellites or telescopes not used to look at the bottom of the orbiter if there was a question regarding tile damage? "

"Answer: they don't have enough resolution to see anything."

I thought spy satellites could read license plates from orbit. Why not the other way around? (This sounds like ass-covering to me.)


197 posted on 02/02/2003 3:07:06 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
In light of this catastrophic failure, the comment "we didn't think" it was a problem kindof leaves me cold.

THIS is typical engineering speak. Engineers think - they don't 'feel' in their trade unless they find themselves at a loss for any other way to make a decision ...

198 posted on 02/02/2003 3:07:14 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
That's what I thought.
199 posted on 02/02/2003 3:07:25 PM PST by Amelia (Who's sending missile parts to Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Rafterman1
march 1
200 posted on 02/02/2003 3:07:33 PM PST by ARA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 581-585 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson