Skip to comments.
The treachery of the French: Samuel Blumenfeld says nation cannot be trusted, master of betrayal
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Sunday, February 2, 2003
| Samuel Blumenfeld
Posted on 02/02/2003 1:45:11 AM PST by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: JohnHuang2; Bear_in_RoseBear
Oh, my! Ping-a-ring-a-ding-ding!
2
posted on
02/02/2003 1:50:58 AM PST
by
Rose in RoseBear
(HHD [... tell us what you really think of France! ...])
To: JohnHuang2
...apart from providing us with fine perfumes, wines and cheeses, the French are incapable of saving Western civilization. Nor do they really want to. That job has been left to us....
To: JohnHuang2
You sir are far to kind towards the French.
To: JohnHuang2
In all honesty, Eisenhower gave de Gaulle the push. Right after the Second World War, both Britain and France nourished hopes of maintaining their prewar empires. After Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, the French and British moved to retake it, only to be turned back by the 6th Fleet. French military strategy after the Second War was dominated by fantasy. They had the idea that a few elite troops, supported by a handful of aircraft, would compensate with elan, for what they lacked in punch.
The French fought the war in Indochina with a veritable pastiche of weapons, including Japanese and German surplus and castoff USN propdriven aircraft. Fantasy was no match for reality and the French were humiliated both in Indochina and Algeria.
America, more than anyone else, knew that the day of the District Commissioner was over. Deep down, the French knew it too, but they resented America most for not having an overseas empire to lose.
The French riposte to these setbacks was to withdraw entirely into a make-believe world. They acquired a small nuclear arsenal, and pointed it at everybody. They then plotted a return to world power based on the notion of "a French jockey on a German horse", a.k.a. the European Union.
But that world power was based on the flawed premise that they would hold the swing vote in a world finely balanced between two superpowers. That power was to be wielded in the United Nations, which was designed specifically to settle the disputes of several great powers. When the Berlin Wall collapsed, the underpinnings of French strategy and the reason for the UN's existence fell with it.
France is desperately embarked on a strategy to recreate a coalition to check the United States. In this effort, it will find a sympathetic hearing from every other aspirational power. Individually, they are overmatched, but severally, they may present a force. The anti-American coalition must be the most ill-assorted agglomeration in world history, consisting of medieval and modern societies, united only in their desire to stop the USA.
Yet such a coalition will prove unstable, as all alliances founded on the purely negative must become. Thieves part ways once the loot is divvied up. The American effort, by contrast, consists of the core set of societies who share a common set of values.
5
posted on
02/02/2003 2:28:21 AM PST
by
wretchard
To: wretchard
Excellent commentary.
6
posted on
02/02/2003 2:32:47 AM PST
by
Caipirabob
([Formerly: Yakboy] Democrat.. Socialist..Commie..Traitor...Who can tell the difference?)
To: Caipirabob
bump
7
posted on
02/02/2003 2:56:34 AM PST
by
expatguy
To: wretchard
Thank you for your comments.
8
posted on
02/02/2003 2:57:17 AM PST
by
DB
(©)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: wretchard
Fantasy was no match for reality and the French were humiliated both in Indochina and Algeria. Yes, humiliated AND and joke to this day
To: wretchard
Hmm... I'm comparing your post to the juvenile graphic posted by Byron the Aussie, and I'm having SUCH a hard time deciding which one provides more substance.
11
posted on
02/02/2003 3:31:49 AM PST
by
tictoc
To: wretchard
"They then plotted a return to world power based on the notion of "a French jockey on a German horse", a.k.a. the European Union."
The French may want to try game theory, to support this outcome?
To: JohnHuang2
A history professor once told me that the more he studied history the less sure he felt about when an event started and when it ended. As a history major, I have concurred with this statement many times.
The French are one of the most polluted cultures and societies in history and continue to fall. However, it goes back much further than Algeria. Some specifics that come to my mind right now are Joan of Arc and the French betrayal of her cause, the French Revolution and how barbaric savagery was embraced by the citizens of that country, and my "piece de resistance" The Dreyfuss Affair which brought down the French Government and is a tragedy to this day (see http://www.pbs.org/newshour/essays/january98/rosenblatt_1-13.html).
J'Accuse!!!
13
posted on
02/02/2003 5:49:03 AM PST
by
wireplay
To: wireplay
The French are one of the most polluted cultures and societies in history and continue to fall.When one contemplates just how influential the French Reign of Terror was on people like Jefferson, one walks away with a profound sense of relief that the pollution was opposed by thoughtful men, many of whom were unfairly vilified at the time (Washington, et al).
To: JohnHuang2
European world dominance was killed by the internicine battles of WWI and WWII. All the Europeans - not just the French - lost the financial and military capabilities necessary to defend their possessions.
The empires were probably unsustainable anyway considering the demographics and the unstoppable spread of technology.
Regardless of the superiority of European cultures and their undoubted ability to provide peace and prosperity to previously benighted countries, they were tyrannies from the point of view of the natives because they treated them as subservient inferiors. Human beings never willingly accept that status.
By the way, I find many Frenchmen and much about their culture to be admirable.
To: JohnHuang2
As always, your post was well conceived and thought provoking. It makes me recall how the French, erroneously following Rousseau's notion of the "General Will", allowed themselves to plunge into the abyss of "the Terror". Once committed to class struggle and the trap of using terror in their quest for "virtue", they ceded the core values of their revolution to the likes of Monsieur Robespierre. Soon the republic was lost to Imperial Napoleon. And so it has been for France, one betrayal after another: The Maid and the Burgundians; Conde; Henry of Navarre; Robespierre, Marat et al; Dreyfus; Petain and his Vichy; De Gaulle and the Algerians...their history is so pockmarked by the treacherous betrayal of idealism that it will never recover. As a backdrop to this sad scene, we must include an ancient and virulent strain of anti-Semitism that has chronically festered since Louis IX launched his medieval diaspora and which, sadly, continues unabated.
To: sphinx; Toirdhealbheach Beucail; curmudgeonII; roderick; Notforprophet; river rat; csvset; ...
Some recent French history ping, especially some of the posts.
If you want on or off the Western Civilization Military History ping list, let me know.
17
posted on
02/02/2003 11:40:01 AM PST
by
Sparta
(Statism is a mental illness)
To: wretchard; JohnHuang2
Also, remember the recent French surrender of the Ivory Coast to Islamofascist rebels.
18
posted on
02/02/2003 11:41:21 AM PST
by
Sparta
(Statism is a mental illness)
To: JohnHuang2
Is this the SAME Samuel Blumenfeld that writes about the public schools,and has various educational books out?
To: JohnHuang2
Froggie bttt
20
posted on
02/02/2003 11:47:11 AM PST
by
lodwick
(God bless America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson