Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle
By the mid-seventies, Nasa was run by astronauts wanting rides, not by scientists exploring space. After the Challenger disaster, astronauts resigned quickly because their hopes of a ride were gone for the foreseeable future.

You've obviously never met, talked to, or worked with the professionals that man the astronaut corp. Your comments with regard to good, decent human beings whom you have never met are incorrect, rude, and especially today, insensitive and very much out of line.

NASA has always had a professional 'tension' between its manned and unmanned side. This occurs in any organization that has competing interests for resources. In addition, like it or not, NASA is a political tool, used by congress and administrations as a carrot to other nations, incentive to join us in partnerships, and a symbol of national power. Scientifically, a robotic mission to mars is worth a lot. Politically, manned presence in space is worth 100 robotic missions.

94 posted on 02/02/2003 10:52:26 AM PST by Magnum44 (remember the Challenger 7, remember the Columbia 7, and never forget 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44
vicarious rider...
108 posted on 02/02/2003 5:35:35 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson