Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Very close-up, slo-mo of the Columbia launch debris.
Florida Today ^ | 02/01/03

Posted on 02/01/2003 5:03:21 PM PST by Prov1322

Edited on 05/07/2004 6:04:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]


(Excerpt) Read more at floridatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: astronauts; columbia; columbiatragedy; debris; disaster; feb12003; nasa; orbit; shuttle; space; spacecenter; spaceshuttle; sts107; video
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-186 next last
To: WillVoteForFood
IMOH it was the wing that failed for whatever reason and pitched the fuselage broadside to the airstream tearing it apart.
81 posted on 02/01/2003 7:41:50 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: XBob
I think they dump any remaining fuel before finally touching down though.
82 posted on 02/01/2003 7:43:06 PM PST by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Stefan Stackhouse
75 point well taken - actually, it is a flying 'truck'

Actually, NASA has already done this and has designed and even test flown a few different designs, but has never gotten any funding much.

The reason - the shuttle job/parts/program employs people in nearly every congressional district in the country.

Your idea would not employ nearly as many people in so many congressional districts.

PS, It was designed this way from the start, as a way to get it funded.
83 posted on 02/01/2003 7:45:17 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: tscislaw
No hand-holds under there.

For the sake of a tether...

What art of engineering allows incidents of debris to be incorporated into an acceptable design?

84 posted on 02/01/2003 7:45:56 PM PST by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Alice in Wonderland
which type of 'foam'?
85 posted on 02/01/2003 7:46:50 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: WillVoteForFood
I reply again as I realize you were speaking about the launch. Once again was it foam or ice. Huge difference in density and the chunk of debris' ability to cause damage. How fast; we'll find out soon, as NASA will be agonizing over their "ok" no harm done descison.
86 posted on 02/01/2003 7:49:46 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ironman
tell that to the guys who carry the partially full hypergol 'watermellons' in the back of the pickup trucks back down to the HMF. (hypergolic maintenance facility)
87 posted on 02/01/2003 7:50:46 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: tscislaw
Unless that "frost" was what was left of dozens of tiles.

That's my thought as well -- pulverized ceramic (and the SS tiles are quite fragile) would look like that.

One thing I don't get -- if the most heat-critical parts of the shuttle (the nose, and the leading edges of the wings) are covered with a tough carbon composite material and not tiles, why not cover *all* of the heat-critical areas with the composite?

88 posted on 02/01/2003 7:52:03 PM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: XBob
It was a block of white "foam" ... sort of like what you describe as 'merangue' in post #26.
89 posted on 02/01/2003 7:56:18 PM PST by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
Just a little dent in the leading edge of the wing could give an inroad to heat erosion at plasma temps.
90 posted on 02/01/2003 7:56:49 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
88 "One thing I don't get -- if the most heat-critical parts of the shuttle (the nose, and the leading edges of the wings) are covered with a tough carbon composite material and not tiles, why not cover *all* of the heat-critical areas with the composite?"

They would like for it to get off the ground, and glide a bit. Even as it is, it has the glide angle of sort of aerodynamic rock.
91 posted on 02/01/2003 7:58:08 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Prov1322
Sheet of ice lifting off the wing.
92 posted on 02/01/2003 7:59:02 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican (God Bless President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
It would seem logical that every flight would include a space walk to ensure the integrity of the tiles.

One of the NASA managers at the press conference today said that the astronauts cannot access the tile side of the shuttle during space walks.

93 posted on 02/01/2003 8:02:47 PM PST by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: XBob
Yep there's probably some fuel left but not too much compared to lift off. Hydrazine I suppose.
94 posted on 02/01/2003 8:03:36 PM PST by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Alice in Wonderland
89 - "It was a block of white "foam" ... sort of like what you describe as 'merangue' in post #26."

ok, good - you don't even need a pencil to put a hole in that, just stick your finger through it.

That is not the insulation from the tank, that is perhaps what the tank insulation ran into at several hundred miles per hour, depending on whether it hit the top or bottom of the wing. That is the white tile on the top.
95 posted on 02/01/2003 8:03:37 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: XBob
They would like for it to get off the ground, and glide a bit. Even as it is, it has the glide angle of sort of aerodynamic rock.

Please be more specific. What are you saying -- that the composite material is a lot heavier than the tile, per square foot covered?

96 posted on 02/01/2003 8:05:58 PM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ironman
94 - "Yep there's probably some fuel left but not too much compared to lift off. Hydrazine I suppose."

right on, they are:

monomethylhydrazine (fuel) and nitrogen tetroxide (oxidizer)
97 posted on 02/01/2003 8:10:23 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
I'm wrong as far as polyurethane. That said, if the foam is ceramic based, it has have more mass and be more able to cause damage as it apparently struck the wing.
98 posted on 02/01/2003 8:10:36 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: XBob
Were they equipped to do space walks? Did they do them? I don't know.

According to a NASA official, they are not capable of seeing the under side of the shuttle while in space. He further stated that, they are not capable of doing a space walk to the underside of the shuttle and they are not capable of repairing tiles while in space.

99 posted on 02/01/2003 8:12:04 PM PST by slimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
96 - "Please be more specific. What are you saying -- that the composite material is a lot heavier than the tile, per square foot covered?"

yes
100 posted on 02/01/2003 8:12:39 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson