Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gcochran
NYTimes confirms that we would have had a decent chance at a good-enough image of the wing damage using adaptive optics telescopes, either the one at Starfire Optical Range (near Albuqerque) or the one on Maui. Trust me, you would want to use the one on Maui. The atmospheric conditions are much better.

Right.

And how would they track the Columbia in a pitched orbit to the North-East or South East (depending on its position in orbit), moving at 500 degrees per hour, with these equatorially mounted, ASTRONOMICAL telescopes designed to follow stars at 15 degrees per HOUR with only a West vector? Satellite tracking telescopes do not generally have the resolution to distinguish any detail at all. We are lucky to get fuzzy shapes.

The shuttle would have to have shut down all operations, closed the bay doors, and turned turtle so the bottom of the wings would be toward the Earth before any of these ground based telescopes could see a thing.

And finally, the only thing to be learned by such an examination was a moot point. IF the tiles were too badly damaged, the astronauts were dead, one way or the other. If they aren't too badly damaged, the shuttle will survive re-entry. A ground based examination MAY show the damage but the DEPTH into the insulation tiles could not be judged from such a distance. You cannot even SEE anything except a possible color differential and, according to John Jamieson, the most important tiles are actually Black Glaze on Black ceramic foam. Only the farther back, less critical tiles are Black on white.

345 posted on 02/02/2003 11:58:01 PM PST by Swordmaker (Tagline Extermination Services, franchises available, small investment, big profit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson