No, my friend. He may well be hiding it.
The onus is on the President or the PM to produce it, as promised, or call the whole thing off. Isn't the way the Left is rallying over this making you nervous? It should be.
What Left? Every whingeing, hand-wringing Labour MP in God's creation is screaming how evil George Bush is and the war shouldn't happen. Maybe it's different in Australia, but here, the Left is against the war, and removing Saddam Hussein.
Ivan
Give me a year of unfettered access in Iraq and I'll find an army buried in various parts of that country.
For a fact-based and thorough explanation of why the Left "thinks" as it does, you might want to take a look at my latest article for United Press International. Click the first link, below.
Congressman Billybob
Click for latest column for UPI, "Historians against History (HAH!)" (Now up on UPI wire, and FR.)
As the politician formerly known as Al Gore has said, my book, "to Restore Trust in America"
I see revisionism in your past, or is it future? This is the most unilateralist thinking there is. Change the resolutions, by yourself, 12 years after they were signed and sealed...then pretend it was that way all along.
The standing arrangement set forth by the UN in each and every (all 16 or so) resolutions is that the burden is upon Saddam to proove his compliance.
The very resolution that stopped the Gulf War was signed on the agreement of a losers burden to be placed upon Saddam.