Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Downing Street reveals ‘deception skills’ of Saddam, the artful dodger
The Sunday Times ^ | February 2, 2003 | Nicholas Rufford

Posted on 02/01/2003 4:01:36 PM PST by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Inspections are a sham. Less jaw-jaw and more war-war, I dare say - and get it done with quickly.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 02/01/2003 4:01:37 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska; Cautor; GOP_Lady; prairiebreeze; veronica; SunnyUsa; Delmarksman; Sparta; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 02/01/2003 4:01:51 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
..Downing Street reveals ‘deception skills’ of Saddam...

Tony the Phony Blair, talking about someone else's 'deception skills.'

That's a hot one, Ive. :)

3 posted on 02/01/2003 4:05:44 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
So you don't think Saddam is hiding WMD? Hmmmm.

Ivan

4 posted on 02/01/2003 4:07:57 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: *war_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
5 posted on 02/01/2003 4:11:39 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
..so you don't think Saddam is hiding WMD? Hmmmm...

No, my friend. He may well be hiding it.

The onus is on the President or the PM to produce it, as promised, or call the whole thing off. Isn't the way the Left is rallying over this making you nervous? It should be.

6 posted on 02/01/2003 4:11:57 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Byron, I have decided not to argue with you, but instead to allow you to post your comments unchallenged.

Rest assured, when everything is revealed, I WILL be pinging you for your comments.

7 posted on 02/01/2003 4:13:01 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Isn't the way the Left is rallying over this making you nervous? It should be.

What Left? Every whingeing, hand-wringing Labour MP in God's creation is screaming how evil George Bush is and the war shouldn't happen. Maybe it's different in Australia, but here, the Left is against the war, and removing Saddam Hussein.

Ivan

8 posted on 02/01/2003 4:13:10 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
bttt for later
9 posted on 02/01/2003 4:15:47 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
..rest assured, when everything is revealed, I WILL be pinging you for your comments....

Please do, madame, and should an apology be in order I'll make it unhesitatingly.

However let me flag something for you; my instinct is that, despite the awesome might of the US' intelligence gathering capability, the 'smoking gun' is not going to be what we were led to expect: a secret anthrax lab in Tikrit, or similar. If it turns out to be transcripts of Camp X-Ray interrogation sessions, or some mystery defector's admissions, that won't cut the mustard. Cheers, By.

10 posted on 02/01/2003 4:19:23 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
...maybe it's different in Australia, but here, the Left is against the war, and removing Saddam Hussein....

Of course they are mate, and that's the problem.

Think back a year or two. The Euro Left were dispirited and issue-less. They had no answer to the success of right-wing candidates voted in on a wave of public concern over immigration. Hell, even Norway moved to the right! And now they are coalescing and rediscovering an identity around anti-war activism. It cannot be good for our side to take the focus off the main game of advancing the cause of conservatism- all for this silly Iraqi sideshow. You don't give an enemy as dangerous as the socialists a stick to beat you with. It's just that simple.

11 posted on 02/01/2003 4:28:09 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Current scuttlebutt indicates the Iraqis have been intercepted electronically saying things like "Quick! Get those documents out the back door!" and "Ha,ha,ha, they didn't find it!"

If this is true, will you be more understanding of our position?

12 posted on 02/01/2003 4:31:11 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
You're being silly. If George W. Bush pulls the plug on the war, then he will look weak, and it'll be President Hillary in 2004. As much of the world follows America in political trends, you want this to happen?

Given what we know about Saddam, he is not a person to trust with weapons of mass destruction either - he should have been killed off during the Gulf War.

Your logic is lacking. I don't know how or why you came to hold onto a militant anti-war position, but it defies reason and logic.

Oh by the way, the right is poised to win elections in Germany, just won on the Netherlands and Israel, and even Labour's lead over the Tories has dropped to just 4 points. So nothing of what you say is coming to pass.

Ivan

13 posted on 02/01/2003 4:31:30 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
The American Left is still dispirited and issueless. I mean Bush has the backing of a huge majority of the US population on this. Game, set, match!
14 posted on 02/01/2003 4:32:26 PM PST by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
..current scuttlebutt indicates the Iraqis have been intercepted electronically saying things like "Quick! Get those documents out the back door!" and "Ha,ha,ha, they didn't find it!"...

I've read that, and it prompts the obvious question: why haven't some of them been electronically intercepted saying things like 'bring the anthrax to laboratory B, 16 Hussein Street, Tikrit'? Can't US SIGINT produce some meat, to go with all the limp salad?

15 posted on 02/01/2003 4:39:43 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Sorry, Matie... ...the onus is not on us to produce. It's on Saddam to come clean and he clearly has not.

Give me a year of unfettered access in Iraq and I'll find an army buried in various parts of that country.

16 posted on 02/01/2003 4:49:18 PM PST by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
...if George W. Bush pulls the plug on the war, then he will look weak....

There's third and fourth options, amigo.

For starters, surely Saddam can be Tomahawked, without the uncertainty of a ground invasion? I've been around long enough to know that once a war starts you can expect the unexpected. And this war is coming at the wrong time in the US political cycle. By 2004 it'll be too late to advance our agenda without giving the Dems a 'heartless Republicans' free kick, and any Iraq creds will have receded in the public's mind.

17 posted on 02/01/2003 4:49:28 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
For starters, surely Saddam can be Tomahawked, without the uncertainty of a ground invasion?

Remember Bill Clinton? To use the President's words, all he managed to do was fire a million dollar missile to take out a 10 dollar tent and hit a camel in the butt.

I've been around long enough to know that once a war starts you can expect the unexpected.

Oh well, we shouldn't have fought Hitler then. Or even Galtieri. Too unpredictable.

And this war is coming at the wrong time in the US political cycle. By 2004 it'll be too late to advance our agenda without giving the Dems a 'heartless Republicans' free kick, and any Iraq creds will have receded in the public's mind.

If the outcome of war is unpredictable, how come the consquences to you are so predictably bad?

Ivan

18 posted on 02/01/2003 4:51:56 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
You sound quite liberal (in the bad sense). You're putting politics above what is right.

Where I'm from (Perth), we wouldn't treat you so nicely.

19 posted on 02/01/2003 4:57:57 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
..Oh well, we shouldn't have fought Hitler then. Or even Galtieri. Too unpredictable...

Ive, you're going to compare Hitler and Galtieri, both of whom attacked British territory, with Saddam, who doesn't even control the northern and southern parts of his own country?

20 posted on 02/01/2003 4:58:35 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson