Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/01/2003 12:02:51 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Timesink
Good information. Thanks for posting it.
2 posted on 02/01/2003 12:04:28 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Ground Control to Major Tom. Ground Control to Major Tom.
Take your protein pills and put your helmet on.
Ground Control to Major Tom, commencing countdown, engines on.
Check ignition and may God's love be with you.

3 posted on 02/01/2003 12:08:26 PM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Wouldn't it make sense to have some old fashioned rocket ships on standby to be used in a pinch?
4 posted on 02/01/2003 12:14:43 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Today marks the end of manned spaceflight as we have known it.

The ISS will be abandoned.

The overwhelming cost of new safety precautions will preclude sending more people into space.

Technology and robotics will continue to outpace human adaptablity is space.

Androids, not humans, will eventually explore the outer planets.

Many Americans will demand that less money be devoted to space.

We have lots of work to do on the earth. We can make the good earth a place no one would want to leave.

There should be no rush to space. It won't go away.

5 posted on 02/01/2003 12:17:19 PM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Good post. The Soyuz "lifeboat" spacecraft was a wise addition to the space station as a means of emergency escape.

In my mind, this incident does not qualify as an "emergency" as it relates to the space station crew. There is no hurry to get them back ahead of schedule (i.e., it's not as if something disastrous is going on up there), so in my mind it would be best to go ahead with the next shuttle mission, using an experienced crew.

I know it sounds counter-intuitive, but I've got a sense that even after this last disaster a shuttle re-entry is safer than using an older Russian unit that comes down the old-fashioned way. There is always the potential for parachute failures, hard landings, etc.

6 posted on 02/01/2003 12:20:52 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
The problem with the ISS is that it has no on orbit boost capability to adjust its orbit. The orbital corrections were made by the shuttle when it was docked with the ISS. Without periodic adjustments, the ISS will eventually come back to Earth just as the Russian Space Station did.

The sad part is that my company submitted a proposal for a boost module for the ISS and NASA decided they did not need it.
8 posted on 02/01/2003 12:40:12 PM PST by Badger1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson