Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Final Radio Transmission From Space Shuttle
Drudge | 2-1-03 | Joe Hadenuf

Posted on 02/01/2003 11:52:21 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf

Final radio transmission between Columbia and Mission Control:

Mission Control: 'Columbia, Houston we see your tire pressure messages and we did not copy your last.'

Columbia: 'Roger, uh, ...' (transmission breaks off after the crew member starts to stay a word beginning with the sound 'buh.')

Burn through??


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: columbiadata; columbiatragedy; feb12003; nasa; spaceshuttle; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: deport
Thanks for the links!
81 posted on 02/01/2003 2:00:36 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

Comment #82 Removed by Moderator

To: sandyeggo
I understand it's toxins from the rocket fuel that can possible contaminate pieces of the spacecraft.....
83 posted on 02/01/2003 2:04:48 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
I *think* it's a corrosive that emanates from the shuttle on re-entry and has a nasty side-effect of coating the bronchioles in your lungs and severely inhibiting oxygen from being metabolized. That's why they bring out a huge fan in front of a landed orbiter to blow the fumes away.
84 posted on 02/01/2003 2:06:44 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
Any hydrazine (unless is was in an "intact" container, i.e. pressure vessel or tank) would have evaporated off before it hit the ground, save for trace amounts on the surface of the object. Hydrazine (actually dimethyl hydrazine) is used as a fuel in combination with nitrogen tetroxide as the oxidizer. The combination ignite on contact. Also nasty stuff, need to wear an enviro-suit with supplied air when working with it (as in fueling a Titan).
85 posted on 02/01/2003 2:07:54 PM PST by Fred Hayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
At the press conference, they said that this was in reference to a sensor on the tire that went out. "As if someone cut the wire" was the description. (Or words to that effect.) It doesn't necessarily indicate a problem with the tire, but rather with the sensor itself. Several other sensors went out in the same fashion. I'm wondering if these sensor leads all route through one common point.

This is sounding more and more like a burn-through.
86 posted on 02/01/2003 2:09:50 PM PST by Redcloak (Join the Coalition to Prevent Unnecessarily Verbose and Nonsensical Tag Lines, eh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
The NASA rep said that all the affected sensors were on independent systems. That's when they began to think something was going wrong, according to him.
87 posted on 02/01/2003 2:12:30 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
I thought hydrazine was mainly used in APU's. I looks like NASA is trying to get rid of it;
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT1997/6000/6920viterna.htm
88 posted on 02/01/2003 2:17:18 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
It also had been used as a thruster propellant, unless NASA had found a safer hypergolic fuel. Hydrazine (not sure whether plain hydrazine or dimethyl hydrazine) was also used on small satellite thrusters, that application more of a monopropellant, running the stuff over a catalyst and decomposing - much like hydrogen peroxide and potassium permanganate.
89 posted on 02/01/2003 2:22:22 PM PST by Fred Hayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
They all feed different signal conditioners, but where do the wires physically route from the wing to those sensors? I suspect that a burn-through was occurring at or near that common route.
90 posted on 02/01/2003 2:25:57 PM PST by Redcloak (Join the Coalition to Prevent Unnecessarily Verbose and Nonsensical Tag Lines, eh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: Redcloak
Ahh, I see what you're saying. Could be.
92 posted on 02/01/2003 2:31:07 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
You're welcome. I'm not 100% certain that hydrazine has those effects, just that some chemical that the shuttle throws off does, and hydrazine seemed to ring a bell in that respect.
93 posted on 02/01/2003 2:32:41 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: deport
From another article........

Even so, experts list six possible causes of the disaster. In order of decreasing likelihood, they are:

¶Problems with the shuttle's tile heat shield, which was apparently damaged slightly at blast off;

¶An explosion of some of the shuttle's fuels and oxidizers, which are under high pressure;

¶The collapse of some part of the shuttle's structure, which is aged;

¶Faulty navigation for the fiery re-entry, possibly caused by a computer problem;

¶The impact of a speeding rock or space debris;

¶Terrorism, perhaps by a technician at the launching site.


94 posted on 02/01/2003 2:49:11 PM PST by deport (They are no longer a problem to the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
I just pray that whatever happened~~happened so quickly that no one on board knew it.

May they rest with the Lord.
95 posted on 02/01/2003 2:54:25 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia (May God bless President Bush and our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Perhaps not possible on the shuttle but I have wondered for a long time why they don't have cameras on commercial airliners to record the events. Seems it would be so much easier to just roll the tape to find out what happened.
96 posted on 02/01/2003 2:54:54 PM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
45 psi - a typical tire pressure, is about three atm. So 3atm on one side and 1atm on the other side of a tire carcass is not so different from 3atm on the inside and 0atm on the outside - only a 50% increase in pressure difference.
97 posted on 02/01/2003 3:05:05 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
I think they were losing sensors in a worrying pattern, rather than getting readings that were outside the normal range.
98 posted on 02/01/2003 3:14:22 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
I think at least one or more of the crew knew they had a huge problem, probably minutes or probably seconds or less just before the event. But as far as any suffering, no, it would have been like turning off a light switch. Over very, very quickly.
99 posted on 02/01/2003 3:19:17 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Make that......Possibly minutes or maybe seconds or less just before the event. But I do believe they had a brief heads up of something very wrong.
100 posted on 02/01/2003 3:21:50 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson