Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
You may want to go back and reread that thread again. The images that are being debated were shot with a Sony camcorder of a television. What Freedom Calls and others cannot explain away is the flat spinning object to the lower right of the object in question. I gotta admit, they made a pretty good case until I saw that. The spinning object is flat, and big, which would explain why the rudder is missing from the object. Not only that, the original video was shot not with a camcorder on the ground but by a news station photographer in an aircraft. Another poster said that the Dallas newstation (WFAA) played the video along with the live coms between the shuttle and NASA and the comms end seconds before the shuttle comes into that shot. Give it a look.
2,440 posted on 02/01/2003 5:49:38 PM PST by wasp69 (The time has come.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2393 | View Replies ]


To: wasp69
I checked out that video clip, and I'm not sure that the object you see can clearly be identified. It looks too big to be the tail.

Even so, I think one issue is the position of the "shuttle" in that video and the fact that the clip lasts several seconds. At 18,000 miles per hour, I can't imagine that the spacecraft would maintain that position for even a few seconds -- it would have to start gyrating/rotating wildly just because of the flow of air around it.

2,467 posted on 02/01/2003 6:55:35 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2440 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson