Posted on 01/31/2003 7:16:54 PM PST by Black Powder
Edited on 07/19/2004 2:10:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
What is that? Each worker cost 10 milions?
I think the deficit has to do with illegal aliens importing services and not paying import tarifs nor income/export taxes on that.
.... and firing 200 state troopers who could bring in ticket and tarif like revenues is not very smart.
Two words: Illegal immigration.
Davis cuts education spending?
The 'Rats have allowed illegal immigrants to get resident tuition rates in colleges while American citizens from other states have to pay out of state tuition fees.
Colleges like UCSC have given tenured professorship to the likes of Angela Davis.
The ethnic studies, queer studies, feminist studies programs, and other non-essential curriculum now necessary to graduate should be eliminated. (A major in engineering should never require a course like "sociology of minority groups" or two semesters of foreign language.)
Instead of just cutting the funding, the educational establishment needs to be required to apply those cuts to some of the nonsense...
Can you explain to me whether this happens in the private sector, too?
I did ask a city official about this, and he explained to me that everyone who works in an excavation (even if it's only a few inches deep) needs a "spotter" in case of a problem. If they're repairing a pipeline, say, the digger and his spotter are there, and so is the pipeline repairer and his spotter. And if there is, say, an electrical line nearby, they might also have an electrician and his spotter.
I asked why one spotter couldn't do for all of them, or perhaps why the digger couldn't spot for the pipeline worker and so on. He said that they need flexibility to move the diggers, pipeline workers, electricians, etc. so they each needed their own spotters.
This looks like overkill to me. Why not give the guys a pager or a cell phone? If they're working in 6' trenches, maybe a spotter is a good idea. But most of the time, they're working in 1' holes.
Am I the only one who thinks this is nuts? I don't want anyone to risk their life unnecessarily, but I also don't like to spend my tax money unnecessarily.
Here in Louisiana, revenue sources dried up over the past few decades and our corrupt state government did not respond well. As a result our economy is backward (or "counter-cyclical," if you wish to be PC). While I don't belittle the needs of these states, perhaps it's time to let some things go undone.
President Bush has challenged Congress to set some spending priorities. We need to do the same at the state and local level. Conceding that there are "unfunded mandates to the states, I would also challenge the states on "dedicated revenues." This has been a real problem in Louisiana.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.