[jennyp]

Ah yes we can all see how this will eventually get to the Gettysburg Address. Just a matter of time and natural selection.

Nah. If you replayed life's tape, or however that Gould quote goes. But with time & natural selection you would get something meaningful. But it would probably be in a language we've never even heard of!

[HiTech RedNeck]

Never fails to amuse me what faith evolutionists have. For every mutation, duplication, what have you that can "find favor" so to speak with the environment there got to be how many millions of don't cares and "turkeys" produced in exactly the same manner? (Remember we got to rule out intelligent design or it ain't "science." Can't have God at the controls of the CAD system twiddling this thing ya know! So we would have to get a staggering amount of this dilapidation and noise.) Once we get to something that is significantly bigger and less prolific than insects, this whole scenario breaks down. But it's all the evolutionists have to play with.

[gore3000]

But with time & natural selection you would get something meaningful.

No you would not. There are supposedly some 10 million years of mutations separating man from chimps. Chimps and men differ by some 5% of their DNA (the evolutionist 1% has been proven wrong by the same man who originally made the statement). Since chimps and men have about 3 billion DNA base pairs that 5% represents some 150,000,000 favorable mutations in those ten million years. Since with all our science, all our billions in research on DNA for decades have not shown a single favorable mutation has ever happened, I think that your statement is absolutely wrong scientifically - just as evolution is completely wrong scientifically.

[f.Christian]

The bottom half of the geologic column (( no fossils )) formed from below . . .

and the top half formed rather quickly from above (( no intermediary fossils )) - - -

uniformism (( time )) // evolution is ==== gone // over // never happened !