Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Huh I guess the majority of the people on this thread will not cite the 2001 Supreme Court case in which the court voted 8-0 that the Federal Government has the right to prosecute cases against "medical marijuana" clubs.

Good to see a Judge follow the law and should be lauded for his effort to follow the law.

12 posted on 01/31/2003 10:16:41 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
Huh I guess the majority of the people on this thread will not cite the 2001 Supreme Court case in which the court voted 8-0 that the Federal Government has the right to prosecute cases against "medical marijuana" clubs.

So the federal government applied the imprimatur of the federal government to sanction the federal government’s usurpation of rights that were never granted to the federal government?

They can because they can.

16 posted on 01/31/2003 10:40:18 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
Huh I guess the majority of the people on this thread will not cite the 2001 Supreme Court case in which the court voted 8-0 that the Federal Government has the right to prosecute cases against "medical marijuana" clubs.

The Supreme Court? Is that not the judicial body that said abortion must be legal in all 50 states, and that the people in those states have virtually no say in the matter?

60 posted on 01/31/2003 3:14:58 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson