1 posted on
01/30/2003 10:45:58 PM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: kattracks
Bush approves nuclear response Now that's a sensationalistic headline if ever I've read one.
2 posted on
01/30/2003 10:51:19 PM PST by
TrappedInLiberalHell
(I'm against tags -- that is, I'm antagonistic.)
To: kattracks
Is it me .. or does it seem like the they keep recycling old news??
3 posted on
01/30/2003 10:52:55 PM PST by
Mo1
(I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
To: kattracks; imhere
If it comes down to it, I'm for nuking Iraq if they use WMDs on our troops or anyone else.
Okay, it is easy to write this on a computer screen, but I've been on the receiving end of a bullet and I've smelt the bad breath of a man I just killed with my K-Bar, so I feel I have a small right to speak.
So, to hell with world opinion! If by using our nukes to save lives (both ours and theirs) in the long run was the right thing to do to end WW2, then I say do it to end the War on Terror.
5 posted on
01/30/2003 11:05:00 PM PST by
sonofatpatcher2
(If God Hadn't Wanted Fully Automatic Weapons, He Wouldn't Have Made All Those Armadillos!)
To: snopercod; joanie-f; kattracks; JeanS; mommadooo3; brityank
For the record, nuclear weapons have always been regarded as a deterrent in "N.B.C. Warfare," without finessing the connections of N to N, B to B, and C to C.
To: kattracks
"...apparently changing a decades-old U.S. policy of deliberate ambiguity..." Frankly, I'm proud and honored to have a President who is deliverately unambiguous.
To: kattracks
Seems sensible to me.
Horrid but sensible, necessary.
10 posted on
01/30/2003 11:21:07 PM PST by
Quix
(21st FREEPCARD FINISHED)
To: kattracks
12 posted on
01/30/2003 11:36:19 PM PST by
Orion78
To: kattracks
13 posted on
01/30/2003 11:36:42 PM PST by
Orion78
To: kattracks
When I was in the military, this doctrine was a given.
If President Bush wants to make it clear as day, MORE power to him. These terrorists do not respond to ambiguity, you have to hit them in the head with a hammer, and the threat of a nuke in response is an awfully big hammer.
15 posted on
01/30/2003 11:40:07 PM PST by
Aric2000
(Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
To: kattracks
Well boys, I reckon this is it. Nuclear-biological combat, toe-to-toe with the Iraqis.
18 posted on
01/31/2003 12:08:52 AM PST by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: kattracks
Memo to the people of Baghdad: Get out now, while there is still time.
19 posted on
01/31/2003 12:09:56 AM PST by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: kattracks
22 posted on
01/31/2003 12:16:15 AM PST by
Orion78
To: kattracks
24 posted on
01/31/2003 12:17:46 AM PST by
Orion78
To: kattracks
25 posted on
01/31/2003 12:19:03 AM PST by
Orion78
To: kattracks
Secretary Baker conveyed a similar message to Iraq prior to the Gulf War letting them know that any WMD attack us would be met with devastating force including the use of nuclear weapons. Just a shot across the bow to let them know what the consequences will be should they be foolish enough to launch a chem/bio attack. North Korea should also heed this message.
37 posted on
01/31/2003 3:52:33 AM PST by
kabar
To: kattracks
I think this is referring to the small load bunker busting nukes were tested lately in Nevada.
46 posted on
01/31/2003 4:46:05 AM PST by
ewing
To: kattracks
Interesting the timing of this release.
Sadaam may need to reinforce his bunkers a bit.
To: kattracks
"I will defend the American people." -- George W. Bush
He isn't just whistling "Dixie."
To: kattracks
Depending on where the potential strike(s) occur,
would the residual radiation muck up the oil fields
for any significant amount of time?
To: kattracks
I done told ya' and told ya'....we should have NO stated position on this issue. The world should always be left wondering - will she, or won't she?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson