Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CalConservative
Thanks. For those of us who follow this stuff, this is big!

One implication is that the rate of change in mitochondrial DNA is probably faster than used in in the original calculations for Eve's age. Meaning the original estimate was too far back. Which would mean we are far younger (as a species) than we thought.
2 posted on 01/28/2003 8:58:36 PM PST by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EternalHope
Gee, does that affect another theory that we evolved from ardvarks?

I'm telling ya, people shock as to what they are willing to have fantasies on when it eliminated the Judeo Christian God. The truth is God created us all and we are all decendents of Adam and Eve.

7 posted on 01/28/2003 9:10:05 PM PST by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: EternalHope
Try 6000'ish years!
12 posted on 01/28/2003 10:06:05 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson