Posted on 01/28/2003 2:13:20 PM PST by MadIvan
Japan on Tuesday admitted that 206kg of its plutonium - enough to make about 25 nuclear bombs - is unaccounted for.
Government scientists said that 6,890kg of plutonium had been extracted since 1977 from spent nuclear fuel at a processing plant about 120km north east of Tokyo. But that is 3 per cent short of the amount the plant was estimated to have produced.
About 5kg to 8kg of plutonium are needed to make a 20-kiloton atomic bomb similar to the one that destroyed Nagasaki in 1945.
Experts said the missing amount was surprisingly large.
There is normally a margin of error of 1 per cent or less when measuring liquid plutonium, which can dissolve into other elements.
Japan's admission comes at a time of acute sensitivity because of the threat of nuclear proliferation in north-east Asia following North Korea's revival of its mothballed nuclear programme.
However, there is no evidence that North Korea was linked to the missing plutonium even though it is known to smuggle goods in and out of Japan.
"This is an unusually large amount of plutonium to be unaccounted for, which makes me uncomfortable, although I think it's highly unlikely that it was stolen," said Tatsujiro Suzuki, senior research scientist at the Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry.
The science ministry, which reported the discrepancy to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), dismissed the idea that the plutonium had been stolen. It said about 90kg was probably diluted into waste-water and about 30kg probably dissolved into other elements.
It admitted it was baffled by the remaining 86kg but said initial output projections may have been too high and the plutonium may not have been produced.
Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the IAEA, said: "The Agency [is] confident that no nuclear material has been diverted from the facility."
The IAEA, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, has urged Japan to strengthen its procedures for measuring nuclear material since it first noted discrepancies in 1998.
Absolutely not! Japan refuses to allow cheap foreign labor to undercut its domestic criminal class!
LOL! Maybe Pat Buchanan is looking at Japan as a model, MIDI(Ministry of Industrial Development Incorporated) and the yakuza(Japanese mafia) working in unison.
Although I have always heard and read that there is a large North Korean prescence behind the pacinko parlors in Japan.
Its primarily a alpha emitter which makes for a lousy dirty bomb.
I used to work in this area, Tsukuba Science City, though I was not involved with the nuclear reprocessing itself, so don't blame me for that whole plutonium thing.
What it does is gather spent nuclear fuel from Japan's many commercial reactors, breaking it down into "unburned" uranium, which goes back into new fuel rods, plutonium, which because of its military potential is burned in specially optimized reactors of its own, and miscellaneous isotopes. The fraction of the miscellaneous isotopes that can't be used for anything is stored - a far smaller volume than we're talkking about doing in Nevada. This facility can also recycle fuel from many foreign sources.
As long as it emits something that can be detected and associated with a nuclear or radiological device it will serve the psychological purpose of keeping people out of the area.
We can relocate the stock exchange in an underground bunker. - Tom
Yeah, sure, they ALWAYS say that! :o)
Yes, it sounds like a very oblique threat. "We'll 'lose' some plutonium you-know-where, if you try anything..."
If it's a bluff, it is certainly world-class.
It's not a bluff, in the sense that they're telling us about the other 6,500 kg of plutonium they have lying around.
North Korea, OTOH, is supposed to have only a few pounds of it at most. I suspect they don't consider this to be an "oblique" reference at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.