Posted on 01/28/2003 12:56:17 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
Readers of the sports pages may notice a change in the newspaper's style beginning today: We have stopped using the nickname "Redskins" to refer to the professional football team of the nation's capital. When we're reporting on that team, we'll call it Washington.
We also have stopped printing logos for professional and college sports teams that use Native symbols -- ones that adopt imagery such as an arrowhead and ones that caricature Native culture. The Chief Wahoo logo of the Cleveland Indians, which we stopped using last summer, is an example of rank caricature. Instead, we'll use alternative logos that stay away from Native symbols.
Finally, we've decided to drop the stereotypical modifier "Fighting" when used with team nicknames such as Fighting Sioux or Fighting Illini.
We've made this decision out of respect for Native people. Plain and simple.
We will no longer use "Redskins" or "Skins" because it is a racial slur. It derives from an old, genocidal practice in this country of scalping Indians to earn a bounty. A bounty hunter could prove he had killed an Indian by turning in a scalp. The bloody scalps were called "redskins." I learned this from the Portland Press Herald in Maine, which banned "Redskins" from its sports pages in July 2000.
What about Native people who proudly wear "Redskins" caps and shirts? That's their choice, just as it is the choice of other sports fans to emblazon the name across their chests, some in the professed belief that it honors Native people.
I choose to credit the words of a Lakota man who recalled that he wore a "Redskins" T-shirt as a boy. He thought it was cool. When he was older, when he heard fans "woo-wooing," he saw things differently. "I felt like a cardboard cutout, a cartoon,'' he said.
Last year, the Native American Journalists Association called on news organizations to stop using sports mascots and nicknames that depict Native Americans by 2004.
I asked Sports Editor John Mabry and News Editor Jim Johnson, a NAJA member, to lead our inquiry on this topic. They researched the question, put together a packet of materials that included readers' views, and arranged for newsroom staffers to get together to talk it over. The two made a recommendation and I have accepted it.
Many sports mascots were adopted at a time in this country when Native people had no voice. Now they have a voice.
Some newspapers have already heeded that voice. The Minneapolis Star Tribune banned the use of all Native team names and mascots in 1994. The Oregonian, the St. Cloud (Minn.) Times, the Portland Press Herald and the Kansas City Star limit publication of Native mascots and images in varying ways.
Today, the Lincoln Journal Star joins their ranks. Out of respect for Native people. Pure and simple.
I'll never forget the full-page ad I saw in USA Today a few years ago. It was placed by a group of Indians asking voters to support some legislation important to operators of Indian casinos. The interesting thing was that nowhere was there any mention of "native Americans"! In it, the group consistently referred to themselves as Indians or American Indians. One might think the "Native American" term was dreamed up by a bunch of leftist, guilt-ridden, P.C. hacks.
I wish I'd kept it.
OK a$$hole where do I send the bill for the new keyboard? Damn Diet Coke is EVERYWHERE!!! ;-)
"The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of IngSoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought...should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meaning and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meaning whatever."
Somehow I just can't visualize a team called the "Sissyboys".
I think they have been indoctrinated into PC anti_white-male cr*p and/or are engaging in deliberate lying. It takes a room temp IQ to buy that lie hook line and sinker ... and it is quite an ironic lie since of course scalping was a practise used by some Indians on white settlers/soldiers. vz. French and Indian wars, etc.
Precisely. It just happens that I am an American Indian, er, Native American (heap smart Ivy League Injun, too). The Great Multi-Cult Mascot Inquisition is, itself, exploitative, condescending, and racist in ways that even the most offensive slurs could not be. It is a prime example of self-appointed outsiders attempting to define an entire ethnic group's views, attitudes, values and roles in society. Our role, as a defined grievance group, is to serve as a tripwire in the linguistic minefield of multi-cult power-seeking. The power relationships they seek are inherent in their choice of language and "sensitivity" is the mailed fist* with which they enforce those choices on others.
Multi-Cultural "sensitivity" is the Trojan Horse** of totalitarian thought control. I am glad that the Washington Redskins have stuck to their guns (so to speak), and refused to surrender to Multi-Cult linguistic terrorism and fantasy etymology. There is a lot more at stake than the name of a sports team.
*Admirers of traditional European warrior culture may be offended. Too bad.
** Greco-Americans may be offended. Get a life.
My sons college roommate has one and I saw it last Saturday, it's great.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.