Replies

A bunch of FReepers should show up wearing those Burger King crowns

Ritter is a hit on the College campus across America! At least we all know who runs the schools, must be liberal Perverts!

Ya'll need to understand - this is dem territory - they may very well agree with Ritter's stand. However, a little counter protest wouldn't hurt!!

Thanks - here's my email...

Dear Mr. Basil:

I read a quote attributed to you where you claimed 90% of the reaction to having Scott Ritter speak at your college was "positive" - is this true, or did you make that up? You see, a lot of leftist thought is based on lies and deceit, and doesn't fly in the face of examination.

Scott Ritter was a former weapons inspector in Iraq, who changed his stance on their atrocious behavior after accepting a $400,000 payment from pro-Saddam Hussein cronies. He has taken cash payments in lieu of standing up for his principles, and is now an anti-Bush, anti-war voice in America. He is also a twice-arrested solicitor for teenage girls, a pedophile, a sex predator, and a danger to the public. Keep a close eye on your daughters while he is in town, if you have any.

Your tacit approval of his sex crimes is unbearable to the American public - your covering up for the left will not go unnoticed during these extremely serious times in World history. Whether or not you have the intellectual capacity for figuring out that Saddam Hussein is a menace to the world and needs to be stopped, or not, and respective of the fact that there is room for debate on the important matter of upcoming war, I believe you are lying to the public about the 90% support levels. Would you care to make a public retraction? You WILL be held accountable for your stances here. Lies and deceipt manufactured to give aid and comfort to our enemies will be noted, catalogued, and made public. Be really careful which side you choose to be on in these times of extreme danger to the free world. A hint for you - one side chooses freedom of thought, freedom to write, speak out, and debate; the other side will slice your face off if you speak out against it. Give this some serious thought before choosing which side YOU are on...

Done, this is what I wrote:

January 28, 03

Dear President Basil,

I am writing in order to express my outrage, dismay and disgust over the Schenectady Community College Board's decision to pay Mr. Scott Ritter $4,000 from a special student-faculty fund and to speak about a possible war with Iraq.

This individual was arrested for allegedly trying to lure a 16-year-old girl to a Menands fast-food restaurant on June 15, 2001. He was charged with a class B misdemeanor for allegedly using the Internet to set up a sexual rendezvous with a person he thought was a 16-year-old girl that he wanted to watch him masturbate! The authorities have the evidence that this was his intent when he set up the meeting. The person Mr. Ritter was corresponding with was actually a Colonie police detective conducting an undercover investigation. Mr. Ritter went to the location and he was arrested for the crime. The case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, meaning the charges would be dropped and the records sealed if Ritter stayed out of trouble for six months. Ritter has acknowledged the arrest, but he has declined to discuss details. Were he innocent, according to the law he is free to clear his name and set the record straight. This he is unwilling to do because he did the deed!

Sir, this matter is not over, last week federal authorities obtained the sealed records for review in a possible federal prosecution on Internet crime charges. This is the man you want to address your students!

It does not matter what the students think of Mr. Ritter, or his stand on Iraq, you and your college board are suppose to be the ADULTS running the school. Adults do not allow alleged pedophiles under federal investigation to come onto campus and address a student body about anything, period! You and your board should be ashamed. If I had a student at Schenectady Community College, I would be looking for another institution to send my son or daughter to for their education and those responsible for giving Mr. Ritter a platform should be fired.

As for Mr. Ritter's new-found pro-Saddam position on Iraq, blackmail has a habit of radically changing one's position. Having served as a Chaplain within a large prison facility for over 5 years I know one thing, it is not a one time deal, child molesters make it a habit of taking sexual advantage of under age girls and boys. I have a sneaking suspicion that Mr. Ritter's lust for little girls was learned by Iraq's regime and that he was set up, captured on film and threatened with exposure if he didn't "cooperate." This, along with the $400,000 he received the Iraqi government goes along way towards explaining his amazing change in position.

I have forwarded copies of this letter to the appropriate news organizations.

G. S., Ph.D.

cc Press and Radio

THE OFFICIAL "KEEP UP WITH RITTER STORIES" THREAD

How many kids' meals can Ritter buy with $4K?

. . feedback he has received is "at the 90 percent level in favor of continuation of the program."

That is the true lagacy of Clinton. These people are saying, "It's only about sex."

BTW, excellent letters that folks are already sending.

President Gabriel J. Basil
President's Office
Elston-Room 114
381-1304
basilgj@gw.sunysccc.edu

Dear Mr. Basil:

It has been brought to my attention Schenectady County Community College intends to compensate former UNSCOM member Scott Ritter for a presentation Saturday, Feb. 12, at 8 p.m. Perhaps, you've heard: While the US armed forces parents are deployed overseas; a pedophile wannabe, Mr. Scott Ritter, stalked their children at home. As community college professor, what I find most interesting; that you, as a steward of taxpayer trust, associate SCCC with a dangerous sexual predator. This is very, very bold.

Should you continue this speaking engagement, do so conditionally. Mr. Ritter repeatedly avoided this question since his $400,000.00 unjust enrichment. Mr. Ritter must explain this quote:

"Actually I'm not going to describe what I saw [in the Iraqi political prisoner children's prison] because what I saw was so horrible that it can be used by those who would want to promote war with Iraq." #1

Should Mr. Ritter again duck the Iraqi children's prison question, follow with: While US Armed forces parents are deployed overseas Mr. Ritter, you stalked America's children at home. Most experts agree sexual predators are incurable. Perhaps Mr. Ritter, a similar relationship with Iraq’s children explains your silence on the prison matter?

Sincerely,
OneLoyalAmerican

CC:
mgoodwin@timesunion.com
marym@dailygazette.com
lamend@dailygazette.com
pvandenburgh@albanyradio.net

#1 http://www.time.com/time/nation/printout/0,8816,351165,00.html

TIME: You've spoke about having seen the children's prisons in Iraq. Can you describe what you saw there?
RITTER: The prison in question is at the General Security Services headquarters, which was inspected by my team in Jan. 1998. It appeared to be a prison for children — toddlers up to pre-adolescents — whose only crime was to be the offspring of those who have spoken out politically against the regime of Saddam Hussein. It was a horrific scene. Actually I'm not going to describe what I saw there because what I saw was so horrible that it can be used by those who would want to promote war with Iraq, and right now I'm waging peace.

In a couple of months Scott Ritter will be such old news that few will remember his name. By then Saddam will be a fait accompli, meaning no longer around, so the whole question of inspectors, should we, shouldn't we, will be moot.

I understand that Ritter is going to talk about ham radio opperation. Something about twisting small knobs.