Posted on 01/27/2003 6:46:13 PM PST by TLBSHOW
Why We Must Act Before It Is Too Late
As drums of war are heard across the globe, the March issue of NewsMax Magazine focuses on the growing threat of North Korea.
Shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, NewsMax.com published an interview with Gen. John Singlaub and Adm. Thomas Moorer. Both of these former senior American military commanders issued important warnings for the future of the U.S.
Their first advice was that President Bush should move quickly to military secure the Panama Canal, over which China had been given operational control. Second, Singlaub and Moorer warned that conflict with North Korea was likely in the near future.
As Gen. Singlaub explained to NewsMax in late 2001, he had little doubt that North Korea, headed by madman Kim Jong Il, would seize the opportunity and threaten war if the U.S. got mired down in a Middle Eastern war.
Singlaubs prediction about North Korea was not a shot in the blue. He had served as chief of staff of U.S. forces in Korea during the 1970s and has carefully monitored Korea since.
Soon after NewsMaxs interview with Moorer and Singlaub appeared, the Pentagon did indeed bolster the United States' naval presence in the Panama Canal, signing a new treaty with the Panamanians.
Now Korea has moved to center stage, just as Singlaub and Moorer predicted.
The Korean threat to the United States today underscores President Bushs warning that unless we deal with rogue nations now while they are comparatively weak, we will have to deal with them tomorrow when they are much stronger.
However, Bush has also kept talk of a Korean crisis muted. This is smart considering we are about to go to war against Iraq, stretching our military resources.
The last thing we need is a two-front war. After Bill Clintons draconian military cuts during the 1990s, a two-front war could prove disastrous.
The Koreans are well aware of our military weakness, and that is why they are now saber-rattling, trying to extort billions of dollars in aid, threatening war on the Korean peninsula, and even suggesting that they may use nuclear weapons.
By all accounts, they already have several nuclear weapons and could have more soon. But if that makes them difficult to deal with now, just imagine how difficult it would be to deal with them once they have dozens of nuclear weapons and advanced missiles. They could even have nuclear-armed missiles capable of hitting the continental United States in the next five years.
Picture the current Korean crisis with San Francisco and Los Angeles in the cross hairs. Now you understand why missile defense is vital.
The bottom line: We must deal with Iraq, North Korea and other countries that threaten the United States before it is too late.
Does that mean the U.S. should go to war with these nations?
Only as a last resort. Instead, the U.S. should use its enormous economic and political power to stop, hinder and change rogue nations.
In addition, well-funded and determined U.S. intelligence services, something that was severely corroded during the Clinton years, could help to make the world a safer by taking the proactive steps that make war unnecessary.
But we must move quickly, even when it is difficult for the public to understand why.
Most people dont appreciate that time is a precious commodity, disappearing before our eyes. But if we do not act while we can from a position of strength in a world where dozens of hostile nations now seek weapons of mass destruction, there may be no second chance for us.
This theme is reinforced by several distinguished writers in the March issue of NewsMax Magazine:
Max Freedman offers a penetrating review of a new book that interestingly illustrates my point about not waiting to act.
In his penetrating biography of the famous educator and psychologist, Rising to the Light: A Portrait of Bruno Bettelheim, Theron Raines details Bettelheims years in Austria, as the Nazis took power and Jews were systematically plundered and sent to the concentration camps.
Bettelheim ended up in Buchenwald and Dachau, like millions of other Jews. Later he admitted that he saw all the warning signs about the Nazis and their imminent danger, yet he and most people did not take decisive action.
Fortunately, Bettelheim was released from Buchenwald shortly before the outbreak of World War II and was able to immigrate to the United States, where he became a leading child educator in Chicago.
Raines writes of Bettelheim in his usual way he wrote to teach, to warn his readers once more that carrying on a normal life can be fatal in extreme circumstances. In the world he know, those who glorified a passive response to oppression were dangerously out of touch with reality; he also believed that cultural attitudes in part led to the inertia that kept ghetto Jews from trying to defend themselves against the Nazis ...
Bettelheims biography makes it clear that we cannot live in the past when our society is under siege. We cannot afford the fantasy believing there is any guarantee the future will be as pleasant as the past, if we simply close our eyes to reality.
Indeed, after Sept. 11, we all live in a new world that demands from each of us greater responsibility, greater awareness, and more forceful action to stop the new evils which threaten us all.
***INSIGHT On The News online: "MISSILE TECHNOLOGY SENT TO CHINA" by Scott L. Wheeler (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "Indianapolis-based Magnequench Inc. has not yet publically announced the closing of its Valparaiso, Ind., factory, but Insight has confirmed that the company will shut down this year and relocate at least some of its high-tech machine tools to Tianjin, China. Word of the shutdown comes as the company is producing critical parts for the U.S. Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) project, more widely known as smart bombs, raising heavy security issues related to the transfer of military technology to the PRC.") (020503)
SAAG.org - SOUTH ASIA ANALYSIS GROUP Paper No.610 by Dr. Rajesh Kumar Misra: "NUCLEAR SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY OF PAKISTAN: CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO NONPROLIFERATION" (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "Recent revelations of support to North Korean uranium enrichment programme and the connections of some of the scientists with Al Qaeda appear to confirm that Pakistan is developing into one of the most dangerous proliferant countries in the world. The nuclear scientific community plays a pivotal role in it. Right at the top, Dr. A.Q. Khan to several other scientists who were involved in the nuclear development programme of Pakistan, remain suspects. More than a dozen scientists in Pakistan can be called as nuclear proliferation agents. Including a list of suspected scientists in Pakistan, this paper is an effort to draw attention of the international community on the existing alleged rogue nuclear scientific community in Pakistan and their potential involvement in proliferation of weapons of mass destruction worldwide at different state and non-state levels.") February 7, 2003
***BBC NEWS: "NORTH KOREA 'REPAIRING' NUCLEAR REACTOR" (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "US intelligence officials believe North Korea may already have a small number of nuclear bombs and the material to make more. The outgoing head of the US Senate foreign affairs committee said that the North could now have the potential to make four to five additional nuclear weapons within months.") (122402)
***WASHINGTON TIMES.com: "CHINA ENACTS LAW EXTENDING ITS CONTROL" by Bill Gertz (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "China has enacted a new decree extending its control over a 200-mile economic zone from its coast that Bush administration officials say could lead to another clash with the United States over freedom of navigation.") (012703)
DefenseLINK.mil: "Remarks by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz , Frontiers of Freedom, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, DC, Thursday, October 24, 2002." (SPEECH Question & Answer Session SNIPPET: "DepSec Wolfowitz: I think what it points out, and I think it should be a reminder to people on every side -- I was about to say both sides of this debate, but I find it a multi-sided debate. Whatever position one holds, one I think should recognize the potential for things to develop in ways that we don't anticipate, and the fact that if you stop and think about it, that concern that I mentioned which is a real one -- As I said, we demonstrated it in 1947 and we aren't the only ones who have thought about it, is something that requires thinking about missile defense in yet another difficult way. One could build the best possible defenses against intercontinental ballistic missiles and miss that possibility. I think as long as there are countries out there -- and there are -- who are as clearly determined as they are and they evidence it among other things, I mentioned the amount of resources they devote to being able to attack us. We need to be thinking ahead of them. We need to be thinking out of the box. We need to remember that there was a time when we said, I believe it was March of 1962, that it was inconceivable the Soviet Union would put missiles in Cuba. I believe in the 1980s when Saudi Arabia acquired long-range ballistic missiles from the Peoples Republic of China it took us completely by surprise. We think a relatively harmless surprise, but nonetheless a surprise.")
stepping back in time...NYI.edu - GLOBAL BEAT: "U.S.-CHINA TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: ANNOTATED TIMELINE 1980- JANUARY 1998" by Bates Gill (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "1988 March - Reports reveal that China has transferred approximately 36 CSS-2 intermediate-range ballistic missiles to Saudi Arabia. This is first transfer of missiles of this range and capability within the developing world; the missiles were originally part of China's strategic arsenal, but Saudi and Chinese officials assure that the missiles will not be nuclear-armed. July - In Beijing, U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz expresses his concern over Chinese missile and weapons exports to Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia.") (June 22, 1998)
Exactly.
I'm not anti-Asian, but I sure am anti- Communist!
No kidding.
Gatun is also the name of the lake in the Panama Canal. Maybe he's down there right now and knows better about what happens in Panama than those armchair commentators ...
The Washington Times - December 14, 1999
Maritime sector prepared for skyrocketing growth In light of the canal's reversion and the acquisition of the inter-oceanic region, Panama has directed its efforts to the creation of a successful transshipment hub. Almost 10 years ago, Panama's leaders foresaw the nautical potential and began evaluating the entities involved in the marine sector. Consequently, in 1998, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP - Spanish acronym) was created to integrate all naval operations, which were dispersed into various ministries. These were the Ports and Ancillary Industries Authority, Merchant Marine Directorate, Marine and Coastal Resources Commission and the Seafarers Directorate. The AMP is responsible for carrying out the "national maritime strategy," managing all marine resources, and complying with all national and international regulations associated with the nautical sector. The strategy, which has been very aggressive, is to create the most complete center of transshipment ever constructed. Panama has all the necessary components: a privileged geography; a principal international maritime route; deep water ports open 24 hours; a flexible government; a prestigious financial center, and Colon's Free Zone. For this, Panama has privatized its ports to prestigious operators and revived the 143- year-old railroad to serve as an intermodal link between the two oceans. "During our first year as the Panama Maritime Authority, we have had a significant growth. We have projects of approximately $441 million. Panama's port sector is considered the first economic impeller; marine product exports is the second, and the Free Zone, the third," explained Jerry Salazar, general administrator of the AMP. The Authority is in charge of representing Panama in all marine aspects around the world, except when the issues pertain to transit through the canal, which is the Panama Canal Authority's jurisdiction. There is a triangular relationship between AMP, the Canal Authority and the Inter-oceanic Region Authority (ARI, for its Spanish acronym); however any activity that may affect the functioning of the canal, must have the approval of the Canal Authority; otherwise, it does not follow through. In the port privatization involving the reverted areas, the ARI leased the land and the AMP negotiated the 25-year leases. According to Reyna, the privatization of ports has brought about efficiency, profitability, and first -class services in tune with a "first-world Canal". Although the increment in container movement is not directly influenced by an increase in canal transit, the AMP is aware that many of the vessels traveling through are empty and, therefore, can be filled in Panama. To increase the arrival of post-Panamax ships, which have much more container capacity, the ports entrances must be dredged. Currently, Panama has three major port holding companies: Manzanillo International Terminal, formed by Stevedoring Services of America and Motores Internacionales, a local firm; Panama Ports, member of Hutchinson Port Holding Group, which has the concession at both Balboa and Cristobal ports, and Evergreen Colon Container Terminal. Last year the ports moved 1 million containers and expect to move twice that many annually within the next four years. For example, Manzanillo International Terminal (MIT), located in the Atlantic Ocean and the most developed and lucrative port right now, moves approximately 33 containers per hour using Post-Panamax container cranes (25 containers per hour is average for container movement around the world.). According to MIT's managing director, David Mishou, the terminal will move 750,000 containers this year, with a 5 percent to 10 percent future increase. For Hans Stig Moller, managing director of Maersk, Panama is the place to be right now, because of the possibilities offered for growth in the transshipment of containers through the canal and the railroad. This company has about 300 transits through the canal and is the largest container carrier in Panama and the biggest user of Manzanillo International Terminal. Parallel to the canal, the transcontinental railroad, a $60 million-investment, will connect the ports in both oceans. Its concession was awarded to Panama Canal Railway Company, joint venture of Kansas City Southern Railway and Mi-Jack Products. The railroad will provide an alternate route for the transshipment of containers at both ends of the isthmus, further expanding the possibility of growth of the marine sector. The authority has created special commissions to address the different areas of the marine sector. To try to be a competitive maritime service provider, it has established four regional offices and others in New York, London, and Manila; has representation in the International Maritime Organization, and, through its Consulates, it provides marine merchant services to 61 posts. The AMP is evaluating expanding offices to Rotterdam and Singapore. The AMP is preparing the documentation necessary for entering the "White List" of the International Maritime Organization, which will be submitted on May 2000 and guarantees certification for all marine operators. Panama has become a world leader of flag registry. "Seventy percent of the new registries are ships less than 5 years old and more than 70 percent of those traveling with our flag have 17 years. We expect quality ships and responsible labor ordinance," added Salazar, who believes Panama has been extremely attentive to quality control in the entire maritime sector. During the next couple of years, as the world observes the canal's operation and the increasing development of the ports, Panama will hold, perhaps, the most important maritime position in the Western Hemisphere. The Ports of Panama Manzanillo International Terminal Panama (MIT) MIT, formed by Stevedoring Services of America and Motores Internacionales, began operating in 1994 with an escalating investment of $300 million. It moves the most containers -750,000 this year- using six 50-long-ton capacity post-panamax container cranes, two 40-long-ton panamax container cranes; it has 1,050 meters of contiguous container berths from 13 to 15 meters deep, and 57 hectares of container yard plus 51 hectares available for future development. MIT provides services to 19 shipping lines and has its own breakwater; therefore, the vessels avoid the canal's traffic. The terminal will be moving about one million containers within the next four years. According to Mishou, its success has to do with providing a quality service at reasonable costs in a privileged geographic position. "Our company has had a good experience here in Panama, we have excellent relations with Panama Maritime Authority, the Inter-oceanic Region Authority, and with the Panama Canal Authority, who are interested in the success of the maritime sector; therefore, our own," said Mishou. Panama Ports Company (PPC) The Panama Ports Company, member of Hutchison Port Holdings Group, won authority at Panama's two largest ports, Balboa in the Pacific and Cristobal in the Atlantic, to operate container terminals in 1996. It has invested $140 million and estimates that it will invest $110 million for the next phase of construction and expansion in both ports. Once finished, the port of Balboa will have a total area of 181 hectares, 1,500 meters of deep-water quay, 50 hectares of container storage area, 12 super post Panamax quay cranes, and a container movement capacity of 1.5 million per year. As for the port of Cristobal, PPC is modernizing the already existing facilities. In its 143 hectares, the port has 450 meters of quay, two Panamax quay cranes, an extended 18 hectares container storage with a capacity an annual capacity of more than 300,000 containers, and more than 27,000 square meters of warehouses, among others. Colon Container Terminal (CCT) Evergreen Shipping, a Taiwanese company, opened its new port in the Atlantic Ocean during 1997. By the year 2002, it expects to finish the $100 million project, which will have a handling capacity of 500,000 containers. CCT consists of 55 acres, a 600-meter container berth, four Panamax gantry cranes, a 15 meter-draft access channel, a 14 meter-draft alongside berth and a 600-meter turning basin. |
That's nice. When you see him, ask him about all the containers stacked up on the Chinese bases and have him detail to you ALL of their contents. Thanks.
Yes, that would be best. The fewer bases that the Communist Chinese maintain in our hemisphere, the better off we'll all be. bttt
The article fails to mention to the reader that Hutchison is - COMMUNIST Chinese owned.
Secondarily, Hutchison did not win the contract. They used bribery to steal the contract from a U. S. firm.
Bttt
We'll, it will take pressure from the American people; hence, bumping this thread daily - might do some good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.