[Carry_Okie]

Here is what you wrote:

Funny how all of these bio-diversity ideas to partition and restrict the US population come from foreign(UN-American) sources.

To which I responded about how the Agenda21 document, the original, was written in Santa Cruz, in the US, BEFORE THE UN EVER ADOPTED IT. Ignoring that, you go on...

Point is even in Santa Cruz the idea is not an American original.

Yes it is. It was written in America, by American commuists. You still don't get it. The documents were LATER used by the UN.

The UN is in New York City, New York.

The headquarters building is. The IUCN (the UN's environmental arm) headquarters is in Switzerland. So? The organization is global; it has offices all over the world.

I was on the first Agenda21 Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management Roundtable in the nation in 1994. I was there to prevent a disaster and got rolled. I have since researched the origins of the governing document. I have since authored original published material on it. Best you learn more about what you are up against before spuoting off pretending that it is the product of foreign influence. It isn't.

The point that you choose to remain in denial about is that the nexus of Sustainable Development, global communism, is not an extranational phenomenon; it is in the UNITED STATES. It certainly isn't the extranational/European influence you were inferring in your post.

[martian_22]

Don't get your panties in a bunch about my ignoring your origin testimony - I accept that; you were there.

My point was and still is if 5 generations of Americans were trained in communism and wrote an entirely new manifesto, out of the heartland, I would still consider it an un-American(anti-American by practice) and foreign idea regardless if it came from europe or not.

Any unconstitutional idea that serves to subdue or enslave us and our posterity is un-American no matter how "American" the idea is portrayed, IMHO.

Thank you for your work.
Do I get it yet?