Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cross-Species Birds May Offer Clues
Science - AP ^ | 2003-01-23

Posted on 01/27/2003 9:53:22 AM PST by Junior

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
"It connects back to some of the earliest roots of evolutionary thought, but also connects to very real issues in human medicine," molecular evolutionist Michael Braun at Smithsonian Institution (news - web sites)'s National Museum of Natural History said after reading the new research.

And creationists say evolution has no practical applications...

1 posted on 01/27/2003 9:53:22 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: balrog666; Condorman; *crevo_list; donh; general_re; Gumlegs; jennyp; longshadow; Nebullis; ...
Ping.
2 posted on 01/27/2003 9:54:41 AM PST by Junior (Put tag line here =>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Science: We used it to switch birds' beaks, so imagine what we could do with it if we weren't high!
3 posted on 01/27/2003 9:56:39 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
The implications are far-reaching.
4 posted on 01/27/2003 10:26:38 AM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I wonder if "molecular evolutionist Michael Braun" knows what gore3000 knows, that every discovery of science in the past 50 years has dispoven evolution.
5 posted on 01/27/2003 10:28:07 AM PST by VadeRetro (You'd think he'd feel funny about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I wonder if "molecular evolutionist Michael Braun" knows what gore3000 knows, that every discovery of science in the past 50 years has dispoven evolution.

I wonder if you have bothered to contemplate just how absurd that claim is...

6 posted on 01/27/2003 10:30:33 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Just goes to show you, these folks ought to consult with LBB before making any pronouncements. After all, he is the end-all and be-all of both science and religion.
7 posted on 01/27/2003 10:34:07 AM PST by Junior (Put tag line here =>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Junior
(Letting them survive to hatch with beaks they didn't know how to use would have been unethical, Helms explained.)

Actually, I think this should have been an important part of the experiment. Would they really not know how to use them? Or would the changes induced be extended into the brain itself?

I don't think that any of this should be surprising. During the embryonic phase, the separate parts of the developing body are running independently. I can imagine that, in the future when genetic control is figured out, you would be able to grow a new arm by resetting the clock on a section of tissue. Feedback from the developing arm would stimulate blood vessel growth, etc. Of course, the bone development at the shoulder would be problematic...

8 posted on 01/27/2003 10:38:09 AM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I wonder if you have bothered to contemplate just how absurd that claim is...

I didn't even contemplate the spelling of "disproven" adequately. But the real question is whether gore3K has contemplated much of anything, ever.

9 posted on 01/27/2003 10:40:45 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Junior
YEC skeptical read later
10 posted on 01/27/2003 10:44:23 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Fascinating! When I was a fishing guide, I would catch a fish and clip-off certain fins.

If done properly, the fish would just swim in circles.

When someone hired me, I always knew where the fish were.

11 posted on 01/27/2003 10:44:56 AM PST by johnny7 (Here's to swimin' with bow-legged women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Incase you’re ever interested in reading criticism of your claims
12 posted on 01/27/2003 10:48:08 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
... your claims.

I guess I needed a "</sarcasm>" on that post. I'm extremely unimpressed with gore's arguments.

13 posted on 01/27/2003 10:54:38 AM PST by VadeRetro (Really, I'm on your side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Reminds me of a joke:
A group of biologists proclaim they can produce life and that God is now irrelevent. God hears this and challenges them to a contest to see who can produce life first from mud. The contest begins and the biologists start collecting mud. God says "Not so fast. Get your own mud."

14 posted on 01/27/2003 10:55:27 AM PST by smokinleroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
The mud was the scientists'. Their ancestors crawled out of it.
15 posted on 01/27/2003 11:01:00 AM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Shades of Spemann. Getting at the centers, in this case, the neural crest, where evolutionary change occurs.
16 posted on 01/27/2003 11:13:29 AM PST by Nebullis (Quck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Let me elaborate a bit. There's often a question about how one change can work when the rest of the organism doesn't change with it to make it work. We see an induction of complementary changes in the host tissue by the transplanted tissue. Cells are very robust and accommodating.
17 posted on 01/27/2003 11:19:04 AM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; ThinkPlease; Focault's Pendulum; Lev; <1/1,000,000th%; cracker; js1138; ...
Ping (in addition to Junior's ping).

[This ping list for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. To be added (or dropped), let me know via freepmail.]

18 posted on 01/27/2003 11:20:57 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Purity of essence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy
Are you saying God can change the rules after the game begins? Sounds like gore2000. Hint: "from mud" implies the availability of mud, but I suppose logic doesn't matter much anyway.
19 posted on 01/27/2003 11:33:52 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Junior
"That means neural crest cells carry species-specific programming for beak growth . . .

What?! "Species-specific programming"?! Where did the programming come from? How did it get there?

So Dick and Jill monkey around with the birds only to tell us what we already knew. Big news! Human medicine has only to gain from this incredible experiment. As if their evolutionary assumptions added something to science. If only all the birds throughout history had folks like Dick and Jill to play with their embryos this world would be a better place, to be sure.

20 posted on 01/27/2003 11:51:25 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew (It'll all come out in the wash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson