Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gothmog
The findings, by Stanford University law professor John Donohue, contradict an influential study by economist John R. Lott Jr,

Let me see. One is trained in the professional use of statistics, and the other is trained in the professional use of bullsh**. Which results should I believe to be scientific? This is a toughie...

4 posted on 01/23/2003 8:58:13 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
One is trained in the professional use of statistics, and the other is trained in the professional use of bullsh**.

Not that I support gun control, but Donohue is quite adept at statistical analysis. He's published a lot of good work in top economics journals.

The study in question is also at the NBER.

23 posted on 01/23/2003 9:24:23 AM PST by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
One is trained in the professional use of statistics, and the other is trained in the professional use of bullsh**. Which results should I believe to be scientific?

Ummm... dirtboy? Is there a difference between statistics and bullsh##?

"There are lies, damned lies, and statistics." Author unknown.

53 posted on 01/23/2003 10:48:11 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson