In addition we'll probably get hit by a few train derailments and highway-bridge collapses.You're joking ... right?
Afghanistan has been nearly totally purged of Al Quieda (sp?), and we haven't had any terrorist events even a fraction of the size of 9/11 -
- yet tales of doom and gloom continue to persist?
Wouldn't it be common sense *to think* that any terrorist groups that could REALLY have acted effectively would have been identified by now - or have ALREADY engaged in some sort terroristic acts?
THIS was never foreseen by the 'terrorists' -
- 1) our invading Afghanistan as well as 2) the threatened invasion of Iraq -
- so MY MONEY would have been placed on a continued succession of ATTACKS commencing *after/coincident with* 9/11 ... not a supremely delayed response predicated on seeing the USA perform actions I (as a terrorist) would have seen as HIGHLY UNLIKELY:
the USA 1) invadiing Afghanistan, then 2) Iraq -
- nor would I (again as a terrorist) allow additional time to elaspse that would allow Law Enforcement within the US to identify and prepare as well as look for said 'terrorists' ...
/1/ Can you tell us now who provided the weaponized anthrax used in the 3 gram total warning attack in 10/2001?
/2/ Can you tell us with certainty that the producer of that anthrax has not brought in and cached 100s of pounds of the same weaponized anthrax in the USA? (We know how good you feds are at keeping other illegal white powders out of the USA, right?)
/3/ Can you tell us what has happened to the missing TONS of Iraqi weaponized anthrax?
Answer those questions conclusively, and I will join you in scoffing at the idea of terrorist attacks in the USA in response to an attack on Iraq.