Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brace for A Real War at Home
DefenseWatch "The Voice of the Grunt" ^ | January 22, 2003 | Ed Offley

Posted on 01/22/2003 7:39:24 PM PST by Mossad1967

The next war with Iraq won't be a distant video-game conflict that we will watch live on CNN as in 1991.

It will likely be a two-front war, with the American heartland as the second battlefield.

That's the quiet but grave warning that senior military officials are beginning to sound as the Defense Department accelerates its plan to assemble nearly 200,000 troops in Southwest Asia preparing to invade and topple the Iraqi regime. Hundreds, if not thousands, of U.S. military personnel are also quietly preparing for combat right here at home.

This is a threat and a response issue that has quietly emerged in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, although it has attracted scant attention or interest from Congress, the news media or public at large...

(Excerpt) Read more at sftt.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jihadinamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
Keep your powder dry! Semper Fi!
1 posted on 01/22/2003 7:39:24 PM PST by Mossad1967
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Bring it on !!

Good luck to Kalifornia and New Yorky, since they can't defend themselves.


2 posted on 01/22/2003 7:41:36 PM PST by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

3 posted on 01/22/2003 7:42:27 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
You may think NY and CA can't defend themselves, you are sorely mistaken.
4 posted on 01/22/2003 7:47:56 PM PST by The Vast Right Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Keep your powder dry! Semper Fi!

I know what you mean, however, let's take it a step further. How about a volunteer militia, formed along the lines of the Civil Air Patrol, that could augment the U.S. Army and Marines. (There's even a past precedent for allowing the use of deadly force for such a unit. During WWII, several U-boats were sunk by those "pesky, little yellow and red airplanes".).

This would take a lot of organization, planning and coordination, but I think given the amount of firepower in American homes and an effort to mobilize "block" militias - on the theory that it's better to fight as a team rather than trying to Rambo it - it would be a tremendous addition to homeland security.

5 posted on 01/22/2003 7:48:05 PM PST by Archangelsk (Freedom is won or lost everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Just Los Angeles and San Francisco. The rest of the state will do just fine.
6 posted on 01/22/2003 7:48:32 PM PST by WarSlut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Thanks for the link.
I had some other materials, but not that particular FEMA guide, which looks to be pretty comprehensive. I downloaded the pdf's I wanted to print for my family. I'm also going to email the link to some other folks.
7 posted on 01/22/2003 7:51:09 PM PST by visualops (C'mon Freeple, lets get to 100%!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Vast Right Wing
I got my street covered!!

Bring em on!
8 posted on 01/22/2003 7:54:13 PM PST by NYTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
A domestic "military" mission is just silly. Terror attacks will be carried out by individuals or small groups who either die in the attack or sneak off into the general population.

The concept of a frontline to assault militarily is preposterous. The aftermath of a domestic terrorist attack is investigation -- perhaps massive, but certainly not military.
9 posted on 01/22/2003 7:54:21 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Ed Offley must have needed an article desperately to write this.

The military does contingency planning for every possible conflict everywhere. The new Northern Command was set up solely to handle Homeland Ddefense. Their whole purpose is to prepare contingency plans for invasion, terrorism and civil war. Either that or go on leave.

The fact that they are doing what they are paid to do is gratifying, but they would be doing exactly the same if Al Quaida, Saddam Hussein and North Korea didn't exist. It means nothing.

So9

10 posted on 01/22/2003 8:00:30 PM PST by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
now you know thats gonna really Pi$$ off the gun grabbers!
11 posted on 01/22/2003 8:04:12 PM PST by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
So you heard it here first: Every American citizen should begin crafting his or her own survival plan in event of a sudden outbreak of terrorism and military combat on home soil (see below for access to a new federal publication on this topic).

The terrorists think we came after them in a big way after 9/11. They try spreading chem or bio, and it will be open season on muslims in the US.

12 posted on 01/22/2003 8:10:52 PM PST by Centurion2000 (The meek shall inherit the Earth. The stars belong to the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan; Travis McGee; blam; Squantos; RJayneJ
"A domestic "military" mission is just silly. Terror attacks will be carried out by individuals or small groups who either die in the attack or sneak off into the general population."

Israel is probably a valid example to look to.

We'll probably see similar attacks here as what Israel has coped with for decades, including civilian sniper attacks, kick-burglary-style home-invasion shootings, car bombs, suicide bombers, mortar attacks on schools and other high-density targets (think: sporting events, political rallies, parades), as well as various attempts to poison our water supplies chemically (e.g. ricin, cyanide) and infect our food supply biologically (e.g. anthrax, smallpox).

In addition we'll probably get hit by a few train derailments and highway-bridge collapses.

Done in the right way, your local infrastructure could be paralyzed for up to two weeks.

Simply insure that you have two weeks worth of food and water sealed in your home, office, or location in which you spend any sizeable portion of your time. Depending upon the type of attack, its affects, and our response (e.g. a no-leave-the-house quarantine in the case of a smallpox attack), you want to be able to handle the disruption with a minimum of muss and fuss.

More able-bodied types should probably consider taking adequate precautions for the home-invasion and sniper scnearios, as well as at least being aware of what one should do (e.g. offense or defense) in the case of a near-by mortar attack.

Can you heat your home for two weeks if the power and gas is cut off? It's worth mulling over now before the real fun starts.

Sadly, no enemy is dumb-enough to attempt a full-scale ground assault on sovereign American soil, so the odds of you being in a firefight of any substance are wildly remote (which bites because I could use the target practice).

But the other scenarios ARE ALREADY being played out in Israel, so it isn't much of a stretch to figure that they will try to bring them to bear on the Great Satan at some point in the future.

Not that it will amount to much, mind you, but they'll probably try all of the above, and one of the best defenses against all of those tactics is simply to have their "possibilities" of happening in your mind already so that any or all of them don't come as a complete and total surprise to you.

For instance, answer the question of "fight or flee" now, NOT when you see a herd of people either running down your streets or huddling in your airport terminal.

We've probably already seen most, if not all, of what they can and will do. Just look over to Israel. Every terrorist tactic can be successfully dealt with by the population at large, of course, but any of us who get caught in the fringes may actually have to take some actions on our own in order to be in as good shape as our society at large...

13 posted on 01/22/2003 8:20:45 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
This is one reason why Madison wrote (as modified by the first Congress), "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed".

"militia" meant every abled bodied citizen (it now legally includes women, in some states, like Texas!) "well regulated" meant properly functioning, fit for its intended purpose.

The AlQaeidians and Saddamites might get in a few nasty licks, but after that, they are toast, probably along with many people who only look like them and have similar names. Such is life.

14 posted on 01/22/2003 8:23:43 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WarSlut; yall
Some of the 'toughest' looking gun show crowds I've ever seen are at the Cow Palace in SF.

And I've been going to shows all over the US for 40 years.
15 posted on 01/22/2003 8:27:18 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Ready on the coast.
16 posted on 01/22/2003 8:29:19 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
There's even a past precedent for allowing the use of deadly force for such a unit. During WWII, several U-boats were sunk by those "pesky, little yellow and red airplanes".)

There was an entire struture of "Home Guard" type units, guarding dams, power plants and such. Early on, there were even anti-submarine patrols by privately owned yachts, some of them armed!

17 posted on 01/22/2003 8:34:22 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
January 22, 2003 12:49

Brace for A Real War at Home

By Ed Offley

The next war with Iraq won't be a distant video-game conflict that we will watch live on CNN as in 1991.

It will likely be a two-front war, with the American heartland as the second battlefield.

That's the quiet but grave warning that senior military officials are beginning to sound as the Defense Department accelerates its plan to assemble nearly 200,000 troops in Southwest Asia preparing to invade and topple the Iraqi regime. Hundreds, if not thousands, of U.S. military personnel are also quietly preparing for combat right here at home.

This is a threat and a response issue that has quietly emerged in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, although it has attracted scant attention or interest from Congress, the news media or public at large.

So you heard it here first: Every American citizen should begin crafting his or her own survival plan in event of a sudden outbreak of terrorism and military combat on home soil (see below for access to a new federal publication on this topic).

In an interview published on Jan. 18 with The Colorado Springs Gazette, the general commanding the new U.S. Northern Command said he is preparing to scramble fighter jets over U.S. cities, deploy combat troops to counter attacks by Iraqi agents or terrorists, and to redeploy Navy warships to ports or coastal areas to repel seaborne incursions.

"I think we would be hard-pressed to come up with a scenario that we haven't thought about," said Air Force Gen. Ed Eberhart, who assumed leadership of Northcom when it formally came into being last Oct. 1.

Northcom today is actually only a headquarters unit with several hundred planners operating under a small (for the U.S. military) $81-million budget this year. It doesn't have ground troops, fighter jets or battleships assigned to it but can "gain" them as needed from the armed services.

Eberhart said that he and his command have been planning a coordinated response with as many as 50 other federal agencies on a large number of "nightmare scenarios" that he declined to specify. Never mind that: It doesn't take a U.N. weapons inspector to guess what they may involve - WMD terrorism with chemical, biological or radiological (if not nuclear) devices, mass terror strikes similar to the 9/11 attacks, shoulder-fired missile launches against civilian airliners or mass murder against "soft targets" such as we have seen in Bali, Pakistan and Tunisia in recent months.

Other federal officials in recent weeks have also dropped hints that elements of the U.S. Special Operations command have already deployed in key American cities such as New York and Washington, D.C., armed with sensors to detect the presence of biological or chemical agents. This would supplement the longstanding role of the Energy Department's Nuclear Emergency Search Teams that are trained to detect and locate emissions of nuclear materials that might be part of a terrorist bomb. One well-placed official recently said that NEST is also accompanied by a force of elite military commandos codenamed "Lincoln Gold" that is charged with "killing the bad guys" when they are found - even in places like downtown Manhattan or the nation's capital.

Eberhart last month announced that Northcom would conduct its first major field exercise in February as "a means for validating our plan" to defend the United States heartland in event an invasion of Iraq results in attacks here.

At that time, Eberhart said he had seen little evidence that al Qaeda "sleeper cells" inside the United States posed a threat to the country. "In terms of our ability to deal with that type of threat, I think each passing day we become more capable," the general told The New York Times.

Other federal officials are more sanguine: Attorney General John Ashbrook warned last summer that al Qaeda retains an "active presence in the United States, waiting to strike again," and that the United States is "at war with a terrorism network operating within our borders." Incoming Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III have also warned that federal agents are keeping constant surveillance on a number of people in the United States known to have contacts with al Qaeda.

So it appears that Northcom's planning is more than a theoretical exercise.

Footnote: The Federal Emergency Management Agency recently updated its citizen preparedness manual to include protective measures in event of terrorism or other attacks. The publication, "Are You Ready? A Guide to Citizen Preparedness," can be accessed at the FEMA website.

Ed Offley is Editor of DefenseWatch. He can be reached at dweditor@yahoo.com.

18 posted on 01/22/2003 8:40:52 PM PST by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Israel is probably a valid example to look to.

Several terrorist attacks have been stopped there by armed civilians, including women, IIRC.

19 posted on 01/22/2003 8:41:30 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Indeed.
20 posted on 01/22/2003 8:42:55 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson