[CharacterCounts]

emme add to that confusion: crier said a bush judge sealed the case but then leaked the case.

Now I'm confused. The President has nothing to do with the appoinment or election of county judges.

[debg]

bingo!

and when did ritter tell crier who the judge was and why did he tell her? or how is it that crier "knows" it was a bush judge when no one else has mentioned this?

loose slips slink hips.

nite all

[cyncooper]

Now I'm confused. The President has nothing to do with the appoinment or election of county judges.

It's a special standard set only for republicans. See, if someone was a supporter of President Bush, why then the president is tarred with whatever that supporter of his does--in this case, the judge sealing the case (and whatever lame implications will be drawn from that).

The standard for dems is there is no standard. The clintons can form a business partnership of a dubious nature with the likes of the MacDougals and they aren't tainted by that relationship one bit.

[cake_crumb]

"Now I'm confused. The President has nothing to do with the appoinment or election of county judges."

LOL...he doesn't.

Crier must be a DUmmy. They were saying over there the other night that the judge was a "Bush appointee"...I believe he IS an EEEEVEEEEL Republican, so he MUST be connected to the EEEVEEEEL BUSH!!

I'm amazed by the avid defense that Ritter ("a registered Republican") is getting from the RATS who are his biggest fans!

Now I'M confused...if the Republican judge is somehow a Bush appointee, then why is the Republican Ritter bashing the president whom he SAYS he voted for?? And if President Bush is EEEEVEEEL because he's Republican, and the JUDGE is EEEEVEEEL because he's a Republican, then why are the RATS - who are bashing Bush and the judge - DEFENDING Republican RItter?!?!