Skip to comments.
NORTH DAKOTA LEGISLATURE: Tobacco ban gets lit up in House
grandforks.com ^
| 21 January 2003
| Xiao Zhang
Posted on 01/22/2003 3:56:17 AM PST by SheLion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Grosz told his fellow representatives that tobacco costs the state close to 1,000 lives every year and $351 million in medical and productivity costs.
Pulling more figures out of da butt I see.......
Gee, one guy voted against the bill because he was worried that "prohibition would drive smoking underground." Whatever the hell that's supposed to mean. In other states it's been driven out of workplaces, parks, and "public places." The only place left IS underground. And so what? Illegal drugs are consumed "underground." I'll bet he's not for legalizing them.
The "North Dakota Medical Association, American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, American Lung Association, North Dakota Public Health Association and North Dakota Nurses Association" were all afraid that prohibiting tobacco won't prevent its use (although that is exactly what they claim happens when smoking bans are imposed) and they don't want to lose their funding for tobacco control programs.
Why in the %$#^ world would anybody need tobacco control programs if there was no tobacco to control? And I don't think smoking compares with Prohibition. It isn't the same. People hole up and drink for a part of the day. Smoking is 24 hours a day minus sleep time wherever you are. It's much more visible.
And what's with The North Dakota Grocer's Association supporting the bill? Retailers "spend too much time and money training employees on proper procedures for proof-of-age in selling tobacco products."
Jeez, don't they sell alcohol in that state?
I read that Texas convenience stores average $312,000 per year in cigarette sales. I don't know how that compares to North Dakota or to grocery stores, but it would take a lot of convincing for me to believe they lose money selling cigarettes.
.......The Above Was Written by Squeezer
1
posted on
01/22/2003 3:56:18 AM PST
by
SheLion
To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; Madame Dufarge; ...
Puff
2
posted on
01/22/2003 3:57:35 AM PST
by
SheLion
To: All
3
posted on
01/22/2003 3:58:07 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: *all
4
posted on
01/22/2003 3:59:02 AM PST
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
I graduated from Minot HS in 1966 at the age of 17. One day at lunch off school grounds I was arrested for smoking cigarettes and had to go to juvenille court. Seems like they are still idiots in north dakota.
5
posted on
01/22/2003 3:59:40 AM PST
by
RWG
To: SheLion
Oh fer cryin' out loud! IT'S A LEGAL PRODUCT!!!
A Republican started this?!
6
posted on
01/22/2003 4:00:02 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
(FReepaholic Navy Vet)
To: SheLion
There's no evidence banning tobacco would prevent and reduce tobacco use because no such approach has been implemented, the groups argued. The ban also could take away certain funding forthese groups for tobacco control programs.It's all about the money and not about health at all. Good to see these slime balls admit it, however inadvertantly.
The best part:
The measure, which would make selling or using tobacco products except for using it for relgious purposes misdemeanors, failed by an 88-4 vote.
Imagine if all the states were stupid enough to pass a law like this! Remember that religious sacrements are tax free!
What could they do if we all exercised our 1st Amendment rights to freedom of religion? Kill the cash cow.
7
posted on
01/22/2003 4:10:13 AM PST
by
metesky
(Why kick somebody when they're still standing and can kick back?)
To: RWG
I graduated from Minot HS in 1966 at the age of 17. One day at lunch off school grounds I was arrested for smoking cigarettes and had to go to juvenille court. Seems like they are still idiots in north dakota. "1966??!!" Your kidding me! ugh!
8
posted on
01/22/2003 4:25:04 AM PST
by
SheLion
To: RandallFlagg
A Republican started this?! Can we say "RINO???"
9
posted on
01/22/2003 4:25:41 AM PST
by
SheLion
To: metesky
What could they do if we all exercised our 1st Amendment rights to freedom of religion? Kill the cash cow. Which reminds me:
10
posted on
01/22/2003 4:26:52 AM PST
by
SheLion
To: metesky
"It's all about the money and not about health at all. Good to see these slime balls admit it, however inadvertantly."
Exactly. I bet the "anti-tobacco" groups about crapped their collective shorts when this bill made it out of committee. LOL
To: SheLion
My dad graduated from Des Lacs (just outside of Minot) in 66, then went to Minot State. small world!
To: SheLion
It always amazes me that Americans don't seem to realize that for every law passed a new bureauracy and supporting group is born.
13
posted on
01/22/2003 4:45:53 AM PST
by
OBone
(Support our boys in uniform)
To: SheLion
Defeated 88-4? Who on earth were the four that are, apparently, all ate up with the goofies?
14
posted on
01/22/2003 5:01:21 AM PST
by
Judith Anne
(This space for office use only.)
To: OBone
Guess they couldn't forgo their TAX MONEY in order to stop kids from having access to EVIL tobacco.
15
posted on
01/22/2003 5:02:06 AM PST
by
GailA
(Throw Away the Keys, Tennessee Tea Party, Start a tax revolt in your state)
To: RandallFlagg; EBUCK; MrLeRoy; FreeTally; Wolfie
"Oh fer cryin' out loud! IT'S A LEGAL PRODUCT!!! "Your just a nicotine addict dude. (Nothing personal just applying drug warrior logic here)
16
posted on
01/22/2003 5:06:22 AM PST
by
Kerberos
To: SheLion
Damn! I wish that would have passed! I'm a smoker who is tired of the BS incrimentalizm towards this. It would have shown the end game; and it would have been fun to watch!
MARK A SITY
http://www.logic101.net/
To: SheLion
If these clowns managed to outlaw a
legal substance, what's next?
Milk?
Peanut butter?
To: Publius6961
Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, was legal unitl the early 1900's.
19
posted on
01/22/2003 5:56:07 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Publius6961
I think we all had better get a good look at the wisdom of the Constitution.
Nothing is clearer now, than the idea that it is there to protect us from our government.
Not from each other; I can deal with that!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson