Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the Nine
I won't support abortions of viable fetuses.

That's good. Now could you define the term "viable fetus"?

51 posted on 01/20/2003 4:39:32 PM PST by jwalsh07 (March for Life in DC ,1/22/03.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
"Now could you define the term "viable fetus"?"

No he/she won't because they are selectivly replying to comments on this board. This usually means they have an agenda and don't want to discuss the issues. This "person" (depending on how they define a person) is not going to respond to any of us...
56 posted on 01/20/2003 4:51:30 PM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07
To: Servant of the Nine

I won't support abortions of viable fetuses.

That's good. Now could you define the term "viable fetus"?

Actually, it is no good at all. The viability criteria is just an arbritrary benchmark made up for child murder to be legalized. It is not realy even a factor today. The child murderes have legal protection, even to the point of stabbing the baby's head as it emerges from the birth canal.

58 posted on 01/20/2003 4:54:40 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson