Skip to comments.
The Latest Scott Ritter Sex Sting Press Coverage - Story is Spreading, slowly...
Various
| January 20, 2003
Posted on 01/20/2003 10:58:19 AM PST by Timesink
Latest Capital News 9 article (Albany):
Articles report dismissed charges
Updated: 1/20/2003 12:36 PM
By: Capital News 9 web staff
According to newspaper reports this weekend, former UN weapons inspector and Delmar native Scott Ritter was arrested for a Class B misdemeanor.
The Daily Gazette and Daily News said the incident happened back in June 2001. All records in the case, including the nature of the arrest have since been sealed.
A veteran Albany County Assistant District Attorney was fired as a result of how the case was handled.
District Attorney Paul Clyne has an office policy to always be informed when cases of a sensitive nature arise.
He said he was shocked when he heard about the Ritter case, and fired Cynthia Preiser after 15 years of service.
Both Ritter and his attorney declined comment on the case.
Efforts to reach Cynthia Preiser have also been unsuccessful.
Ritter has appeared as a commentator on national news networks, and right here on Capital News 9.
Ritter gained national attention as a former UN weapons inspector in Iraq for his outspoken opposition to the Bush administration policies in Iraq.
From Fox 23 News - WXXA Albany (This is straight from the newsroom's teleprompter/closed captioning feed), posted approximately noon Eastern:
Ritter Arrested on Sex Charges
FORMER U-N WEAPONS INSPECTOR SCOTT RITTER A FIXTURE ON LOCAL AND NATIONAL NEWS SHOWS--- HIS PICTURE NOW GRACING THE AIRWAVES IN DISGRACE AFTER DETAILS OF AN ARREST COME OUT.
REPORTS SHOW SCOTT RITTER OF DELMAR-- -WHO FREQUENTLY SOUNDS OFF IN THE PRESS ON IRAQI ISSUES--- WAS SECRETLY PROSECUTED IN ALBANY COUNTY TWO YEARS AGO AFTER BEING CAUGHT IN AN INTERNET SEX STING OPERATION. THE CASE APPARENTLY SEALED...AND A DEAL STRUCK WITH ONE OF ALBANY COUNTY'S ASSISTANT D-A'S.....THAT D-A NOW FIRED.
AND THE CHARGES AGAINST RITTER JUST NOW COMING TO LIGHT. {realistic thinking, responsible thinking. I spent time in Iraq--I would spend three or four weeks there.}
HIS LOUD CALLS FOR PEACE BRINGING GOVERNMENT SCRUTINY AT EVERY ANGLE...NOW FORMER U-N WEAPONS INSPECTOR AND DELMAR NATIVE, SCOTT RITTER UNDER SCRUTINY AGAIN-- THIS A LITTLE MORE PERSONAL--- FOR SEX CHARGES.
REPORTS SHOW RITTER WAS ARRESTED BY COLONIE POLICE IN JUNE OF 2001 AFTER HE ALLEGEDLY HAD A SEX CONVERSATION ON THE INTERNET WITH AN UNDERAGE GIRL, WHO TURNED OUT TO BE AN UNDERCOVER COP.
RITTER NOT AT HOME TODAY.... HIS WIFE REFUSING TO COMMENT.... {Is there any comment that you'd like to make? no comment what so ever. What about Scott? the same position, he will not make a comment what so ever.}
ASSISTANT D-A, CYNTHIA PRIESER HANDLED THE CASE AGAINST RITTER. REPORTS SHOW THE TWO STRUCK A DEALâ?¦ SEALING THE CASE AND DISMISSING IT 6 MONTHS AFTER THE ARREST.PRIESER NOW FIRED FOR FAILING TO TELL DA PAUL CLYNE THE CASE EVER EXISTED.
NEIGHBORS IN DISBELIEF THAT RITTER, A HUSBAND AND FATHER OF TWO WOULD DO THIS... {I'd be shocked. Scott's a good guy. Every encounter I've ever had with him has been positive. He's been a good neighbor and a friend.} {The timing seems suspicious on top of the origination of some of the allegations.}
RITTER HAS SAID THAT WAR WITH IRAQ SHOULD ONLY BE PURSUED AS A LAST RESORT...THIS OPINION WIDELY CRITICIZED BY MANY POLITICIANS.... NOW HIS OPINION MAY CARRY EVEN LESS WEIGHT IN LIGHT OF THIS SEXUAL SCANDAL.
SCOTT RITTER WAS MOST RECENTLY ON TELEVISION LAST WEEK COMMENTING ON THE DISCOVERY OF EMPTY WARHEADS IN IRAQ. HIS WIFE TELLS US HE'S NOW IN CALIFORNIA.
From WTEN Channel 10 Albany:Delmar Weapons Inspector in Hot Water
(posted: January 20th, 8:58am) The spotlight is back on former UN Weapons Inspector and Delmar native, Scott Ritter. But it's not over Iraq instead its over charges he talked with an underage girl on the Internet.
The Daily Gazette broke the story over the weekend. The paper says Ritter was arrested in June of 2001 after having a sexual conversation on the Internet with someone he "thought" was an underage girl.
The girl turned out to be an undercover investigator.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mediacoverage; scottritter; scottrittercase; sexsting; underagedgirls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Now if we can just get this story beyond Albany and "Fox & Friends"...
1
posted on
01/20/2003 10:58:19 AM PST
by
Timesink
To: All
2
posted on
01/20/2003 10:59:49 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Timesink
Rush just mentioned it in the last half hour. It will probably lead the Grapevine on Britt Hume's show tonight.
To: Timesink
I realized that talking about injuring political figures (pres, vp, judges, etc) was illegal.
Are there other things it is illegal to talk about on the internet.
While Ritter's behavior is reprehensible, and I think him a traitor, I'm truly wondering what else it is illegal to talk about on the internet.
4
posted on
01/20/2003 11:10:10 AM PST
by
xzins
(Don't go on what he writes.....go on what you "feel" he means)
To: xzins
The First Amendment is 100% applicable to the internet. Period. If you can say it or print it in the "real world," you can say it here.
5
posted on
01/20/2003 11:12:24 AM PST
by
Timesink
(Poodle: The Other White Meat)
To: Timesink
I think it's time for Scott Ritter to assist Scott Peterson in the search for Laci in LA...
6
posted on
01/20/2003 11:12:46 AM PST
by
Registered
(Be a Star, donate to FR.)
To: Timesink
Quite a lot on google re:Cynthia Preiser. However, not as yet able to establish link to Shillary...Hence the reason for Preiser to "seal and shut-up?" Familiar pattern, if so. Guess Ann Coulter was right about Scott Ritter. That is, someone or something "got to him."
7
posted on
01/20/2003 11:13:31 AM PST
by
donozark
To: Timesink
Look for O'Reilley to go off on him. He hates Pedophiles and people who try to lie to him.
So9
8
posted on
01/20/2003 11:14:26 AM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: donozark
Minor Capital News 9 update:
Articles report dismissed charges
Updated: 1/20/2003 1:38 PM
By: Capital News 9 web staff
According to newspaper reports this weekend, former UN weapons inspector and Delmar resident Scott Ritter was arrested for a Class B misdemeanor.
The Daily Gazette and Daily News said the incident happened back in June 2001. All records in the case, including the nature of the arrest have since been sealed.
A veteran Albany County Assistant District Attorney was fired as a result of how the case was handled.
District Attorney Paul Clyne has an office policy to always be informed when cases of a sensitive nature arise.
He said he was shocked when he heard about the Ritter case, and fired Cynthia Preiser after 15 years of service.
Both Ritter and his attorney declined comment on the case.
Efforts to reach Cynthia Preiser have also been unsuccessful.
Ritter has appeared as a commentator on national news networks, and right here on Capital News 9.
Ritter gained national attention as a former UN weapons inspector in Iraq for his outspoken opposition to the Bush administration policies in Iraq.
9
posted on
01/20/2003 11:16:45 AM PST
by
Timesink
(Poodle: The Other White Meat)
To: Timesink
CRIMENETDAILY
Reports claim Ritter arrested in sex sting
Does ex-weapons inspector pressing impeachment have own legal trouble?
Posted: January 19, 2003
7:11 p.m. Eastern
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Scott Ritter, the former weapons inspector who says President Bush should be impeached for his Iraq policy, was secretly arrested and prosecuted in New York a year and a half ago after allegedly being caught in an Internet sex sting, say law enforcement sources in published reports.
Scott Ritter
The Schenectady Daily Gazette and New York Daily News report Ritter was arrested in June 2001 for allegedly having an online sexual discussion with someone he thought was an underage girl. It turns out that "girl" was really an undercover police investigator, according to the Daily News whose sources spoke on condition of anonymity.
Ritter lives in the Albany suburb of Delmar, and was reportedly arrested by police in Colonie, N.Y.
The case was apparently kept so secret, the head local prosecutor did not even know it existed.
The Daily Gazette reports Albany District Attorney Paul Clyne fired veteran Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Preiser last week when he finally learned of the matter.
"I was shocked and angered to learn that the case had been disposed of by one of my assistant district attorneys without consulting me," Clyne told the paper. "Any arguably sensitive case should be brought to my attention."
Sources told the Gazette that Ritter's attorney and a town court judge agreed to adjourn the matter in contemplation of a dismissal.
That generally means the case is on hold for six months, and if the defendant doesn't get into trouble, the case is usually dismissed and the record sealed. The adjournment means neither an admission of guilt or innocence. The charge was reportedly a class B misdemeanor.
For his part, Ritter claims he knows nothing of the arrest.
"Sorry, you must have the wrong person," said Ritter when contacted at his home by the Daily Gazette.
Ritter's legal name is William Scott Ritter, and the town attorney's office in Colonie reportedly confirmed that an arrest record for Ritter did exist, though it declined any further disclosure, saying it was exempt.
As WorldNetDaily reported yesterday, Ritter is calling for the ouster of President Bush for what he feels are unnecessary and murderous actions in the conflict with Iraq.
"I would be in favor of the impeachment of President Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors," the 41-year old former Marine told WND. "Murder is a high crime and misdemeanor, and I can't think of any better definition than murder when he talks about American service members and putting them in a war which is not only illegal but is based on a foundation of lies."
"When you go to war you open up a Pandora's box, the results of which cannot be predicted," he said. "Therefore, there better be a darned good reason to go to war. It's got to be worth the sacrifice that you're asking others to make."
WorldNetDaily recently interviewed Ritter via telephone as he drove from his New York home to appear on Fox News. Throughout the interview, he contended that media have consistently missed his primary concern regarding the proposed military strike against Iraq.
Ritter said the issue is the abrogation of the rule of law, which he views as setting the U.S. up for a particularly nasty potential scenario U.S. troops cornered in Iraq, subject to chemical attack, which then prompts the use of nuclear weapons by the U.S.
"The Bush administration has put forward a nuclear policy planning document which clearly states a scenario in which nuclear weapons can be used pre-emptively and that scenario is tens of thousands of troops in a hostile land, threatened by the potential of chemical and biological weapons," he said. "And clearly, Iraq could evolve into such a situation.
"What's wrong with diplomacy, what's wrong with inspectors, what's wrong with the rule of law?" he asked.
WorldNetDaily asked Ritter whether he agreed with the contention that Bush's foreign policy constituted a violation of the United Nations and Nuremberg charters.
Ritter reiterated that the U.S. is a signatory to the U.N. Charter, which "stipulates that war is rejected as a means to resolve disputes and conflicts," although he allowed that there are exceptions, as "when the collective, the U.N. Security Council, finds a situation exists that threatens international peace. Then under chapter seven of the charter, it can be resolved by use of force."
Still, Ritter does not find the current situation in Iraq to meet this criteria, and therefore views the idea of a pre-emptive strike as unconstitutional and a violation of American law.
"It has no grounds in legality," he said.
"This is a constitutional issue," he continued. "I think there can be no doubt his policy is a violation of the Constitution, except that constitutional lawyers will say that judicial system will not get involved in matters of national security
There are interpretation issues what are the limits of executive authority?
I think that it's not so much the legality of his actions. I view it as being unconstitutional
I'm sure many will say the president has these authorities regarding national security."
Ritter also said that impeachment and indictment were legitimate issues.
"What I would find to be grounds of impeachment is the president lying to the American people," he said. "I believe the president has lied to the American people. I believe the vice president has lied to the American people.
"And if we go to war where American service members are killed, I think the president should be held accountable for this judicially," Ritter stated.
"I would be in favor of the impeachment of President Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors," said Ritter. "Murder is a high crime and misdemeanor, and I can't think of any better definition than murder when he talks about American service members and putting them in a war which is not only illegal but is based on a foundation of lies."
WND also asked Ritter about comments he made in an interview with William Pitt, appearing in the book "War on Iraq: What Team Bush doesn't want you to know."
In that interview, Ritter said that "Donald Rumsfeld was politically dead. No one thought of Donald Rumsfeld as having any potential. Paul Wolfowitz was seen as a raving lunatic of the far right. Richard Perle is not called 'The Prince of Darkness' without cause."
Ritter characterized the leaders as "sniping from the fringes," and said "suddenly they're running the show," adding that for this reason, these are "extremely dangerous times."
WND asked Ritter whether he viewed these people as having taken this turn since taking office, or always having been that way.
"Well, they were always this way," he said. "Wolfowitz was always a very dangerous man. He is a walking affront to the Constitution of the U.S. He is a walking affront to international law. The same with Richard Perle . He was openly boastful how President Bush has no other choice but go to war because he's committed too much political capital."
Ritter concluded, "If Richard Perle thinks [that's] a reason to go to war then he might as well remove the American flag from outside his building and put on a swastika and call himself what he is, which is a Nazi. This is the rule of law, not about going to war for political convenience of any single individual."
WorldNetDaily then asked Ritter why, if these political figures were always this way, he voted them into power by voting for President Bush. The former U.N. inspector argued that he didn't vote for them, just for Bush, adding that Gore was a "known commodity a liar," and that he had actually initially supported Sen. John McCain.
To: Timesink
The First Amendment is 100% applicable to the internet. Period. If you can say it or print it in the "real world," you can say it here. I'm honestly not trying to special plead for Ritter.
I'm totally surprised however that his crime is "sexual talking to an underage girl" on the Internet. Apparently they charged him for that, OR there's something much more incriminating missing in this story.
11
posted on
01/20/2003 11:18:49 AM PST
by
xzins
(Don't go on what he writes.....go on what you "feel" he means)
The daily Chris Matthews Hardball email just came in. It does include a link to the original Daily News story about Ritter. Doesn't necessarily mean Matthews will discuss it on-air, but now we know he knows about it.
12
posted on
01/20/2003 11:20:25 AM PST
by
Timesink
(Poodle: The Other White Meat)
To: Registered
LMAO!
13
posted on
01/20/2003 11:21:21 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: donozark
I think a lot of the story will come to light when we learn more about this Cynthia Preiser.
Who knows about her?
14
posted on
01/20/2003 11:21:46 AM PST
by
Zebra
To: xzins
How much more incrimination do you need? That he was attempting to assault the innocence of more than one 12-year-old? Sheesh.
To: xzins
I'm totally surprised however that his crime is "sexual talking to an underage girl" on the Internet. Apparently they charged him for that, OR there's something much more incriminating missing in this story.Well, it would depend on the law in NY State, I guess. But I agree; I think there's more to this than we've been told.
16
posted on
01/20/2003 11:22:36 AM PST
by
Timesink
(Poodle: The Other White Meat)
To: xzins
Line between "attempted statutory rape" and the actual act may be blurred in some states. No attorney here, and totally unfamiliar with NY state law. However, I am very familiar with nearby case. The man actually showed up at mall to "meet" this particular "young girl." She was an undercover cop. He is in the slammer-5-7 years....
Would be interesting to know just how far Ritter "went."
17
posted on
01/20/2003 11:28:09 AM PST
by
donozark
To: Cultural Jihad
reread #11 and read #16
Something is missing here. How can they make talking illegal? Something doesn't ring true about that.
I'd bet money that it was a plea bargain of sorts, that that's why the DA is so upset with his deputy, and that this had to get into the area of meeting and maybe even touching.
18
posted on
01/20/2003 11:29:28 AM PST
by
xzins
(Don't go on what he writes.....go on what you "feel" he means)
To: Timesink
for allegedly having an online sexual discussion with someone he thought was an underage girl. It turns out that "girl" was really an undercover police investigator, according to the Daily News whose sources spoke on condition of anonymity. the town attorney's office in Colonie reportedly confirmed that an arrest record for Ritter did exist, though it declined any further disclosure, saying it was exempt.
The charge was reportedly a class B misdemeanor
To: donozark
That's what I'm thinking...see my #18 post.
Maybe he solicited child porn photos...something.
I don't think a state can criminalize "talking." 14th amendment says all rights apply within every state, doesn't it?
20
posted on
01/20/2003 11:31:42 AM PST
by
xzins
(Don't go on what he writes.....go on what you "feel" he means)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson