1 posted on
01/20/2003 9:38:04 AM PST by
Jean S
To: JeanS
Pathetic...BTT
2 posted on
01/20/2003 9:42:29 AM PST by
Nubbin
To: JeanS
There is a lot more to this than meets the eye!!
Why would a seasoned ADA stick her neck out to protect a high visibility perv? It doesn't make sense. My bet is that there is a lot more being covered up here. Ritter has lived in that area for two years. Why would an ADA cover for him unless she was well paid. Is the charge bad enough that it would effect Ritter's credibility? He didn't have any. And, if the ADA covered for him here, what else did she cover? How did the DA find out about this charge? Is the DA searching to see if there were/are other coverups? If not, why not?
3 posted on
01/20/2003 10:05:16 AM PST by
Tacis
To: JeanS
Charges of pedophilia have been taking down a lot of high profiles lately
Wonder how many higher profiles skate
4 posted on
01/20/2003 10:15:22 AM PST by
joesnuffy
To: JeanS
Charges of pedophilia have been taking down a lot of high profiles lately
Wonder how many higher profiles skate
5 posted on
01/20/2003 10:16:17 AM PST by
joesnuffy
To: JeanS
Chances are this is not the first time. I suggest that Iraq found out about Scott's little "preferences" and were using them to blackmail him. He's always seemed to be in a bit of a panic to convice us that Iraq is innocent. Everyone thought it was because of the film money, but he was too panicy for it to just be about money.
To: JeanS
So, whose sting operation was it, locals or Feds? Sometimes in a Fed operation they'll ask the locals to make the actual arrest. Why did the ADA hide this? Who esle knew besides the arresting officers, the ADA and the judge? And if the Feds knew about this arrest, why the heck have they kept quiet about Ritter?
10 posted on
01/20/2003 8:34:23 PM PST by
mewzilla
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson