[Tacis]

There is a lot more to this than meets the eye!!

Why would a seasoned ADA stick her neck out to protect a high visibility perv? It doesn't make sense. My bet is that there is a lot more being covered up here. Ritter has lived in that area for two years. Why would an ADA cover for him unless she was well paid. Is the charge bad enough that it would effect Ritter's credibility? He didn't have any. And, if the ADA covered for him here, what else did she cover? How did the DA find out about this charge? Is the DA searching to see if there were/are other coverups? If not, why not?

[Reactionary]

It certainly looks like someone covered up for Ritter so they could make use of him later on. That "someone" is obviously someone well connected. We need to find out who it was.

[Reactionary]

He was arrested in New York, correct? Does anyone know what congressional district this is?

I smell a DNC/Hillary operation.

[okie01]

"Why would a seasoned ADA stick her neck out to protect a high visibility perv? It doesn't make sense. My bet is that there is a lot more being covered up here. Ritter has lived in that area for two years. Why would an ADA cover for him unless she was well paid."

Your questions are valid. Something is going on here.

By the same token, why is it that the local TV station (WNYT) had video of the arrest and a mug shot of "William Ritter" -- yet, couldn't seem to connect the affair with Scott Ritter? Who, as you note, had been a high-visibility resident of the area for two years.

Incompetent journalists? Or an arranged oversight? By whom? In whose behalf?

I suggest that anybody who might know the answers to these questions will not want to reveal them...