[Pharmboy]

Oh, I'm sorry: I thought this was about female paleontologists coming up with an insight on the evolution of flight. Nevermind.

[Support Free Republic]

Raise Your Hand If You Want To Donate To Free Republic!
	Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

[Pharmboy]

*Ping*

[Revolting cat!]

I know one thing: chicks dig pilots!

[TomSmedley]

Darwinist fair tales are SO amusing! or would be hilarious, if they weren't so pathetic!

[PatrickHenry]

This is the third thread today on this topic. I suggest everyone go to the first one: HERE.

[newgeezer]

[Intimidator]

Dang I thought we were going to have some pictures of hot chicks.

[Paradox]

"Um, like, birds are SOOOOoo cute! And like, flying is WAY COOL!, ya know?"

"One day? I saw this bird flying by? And I was like 'Oh my Gosh!, he's FLYING!'. He was in the air? Like, real high? Or maybe it was a she? Whatever, it was like, SO COOL?!"

[Old Professer]

Somehow, I was inspired to copy and paste this:

[Cicero]

It's really impossible to explain how there can be any evolutionary advantage to a partly-developed wing (or eye, or arm, or leg). Yet the whole theory of evolution is based on the idea that there IS an advantage.

After all, until the wing developes far enough to actually be useful, it would be an obvious nuisance, weighing its possessor down and getting tangled up in the bushes. So in theory the wingless birds would out-survive the half-winged birds, and, ipso facto, wings would never develop.

That's really only one of the minor problems with the theory of evolution. On the micro level there are much bigger scientific difficulties--in fact, impossibilities. Trust an evolutionist to come up with this cock and bull story. Or chick story.