Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds seek to oust gold miner
WorldNetDaily ^ | January 16, 2003 | Sara Foster

Posted on 01/17/2003 7:57:23 AM PST by editor-surveyor

By Sarah Foster
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

It may be a close call, but help is on the way for a beleaguered, small-scale gold miner that the U.S. Forest Service wants to oust from an abandoned mining town that's been his home nearly 40 years.

Gerald "Jerry" Fennell, 61, is the last of the independent gold miners in the Jicarilla Mountains in south-central New Mexico, and one of the few remaining in the state.

Under orders sent last October by the Forest Service, Fennell had until yesterday to pack up and clear out or face trespassing charges. But with help from a local group and folks in the area who are rallying 'round, he's going to dig in his heels and fight.


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: gold; landgrab; landrights; mining; nationalforests; reuters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
I know from my own experience with land that I own that this man has the right to occupy this land.
1 posted on 01/17/2003 7:57:23 AM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Marxists aren't just pretending to want control

Send them packing. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/17/2003 7:59:17 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; a_federalist; abner; aculeus; alaskanfan; alloysteel; ...
Here they come again!

The Feds think that they own it all.

3 posted on 01/17/2003 7:59:27 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Gold Prospectors Association of America discussion forum

4 posted on 01/17/2003 8:16:56 AM PST by rface (Ashland, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
BTTT!!!!!
5 posted on 01/17/2003 8:16:57 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

"We'll be asking for an injunction to stop the eviction," says Jay Walley, communications director at the Paragon Foundation, a nonprofit public-policy organization in Alamogordo, N.M., that focuses on land rights and public access to federal lands. "From what we can tell, the Forest Service does not own those buildings where Jerry's living and has his mine – the question is, who does? In any case, there needs to be a closer look at this."

You won't find Jicarilla on a standard road map. It's "miles from nowhere," and to get there you must travel along a dirt forest road to the heart of the Lincoln National Forest. If you don't look sharp you just might miss it. Today it's a ghost town, but 75 years ago it was a small but thriving mining community. During the early 1930s, it had a population of some 300 people. There are only three buildings left – the church, the log schoolhouse and the former general store that Fennell moved into in 1997. The nearest town is Carrizozo, population 1060, located 30 miles to the southwest.


Jicarilla. Photo: Jay Walley

Sitting on a gold mine

Fennell owns several mining claims in the area, and what's left of the town sits on one of them. A 1988 article in the International California Mining Journal estimates there's a bonanza of $20 million in fine gold in the 1,920 acres that make up his mining claim, but he limits his operation to a swimming pool-size pit behind the store, which he works with a pickaxe and shovel, hauling the ore by wheelbarrow or with the help of a burro named "Dusty."

Last summer, Walley traveled to Jicarilla to meet the long-time resident gold miner and see his place first hand.

He keeps his efforts "small by design and philosophy," wrote Walley in an Aug. 18 report for newssite Sierra Times.

"I keep it that way because I don't want to disturb the land more than I have to; I just take enough gold to get by," Fennell told Walley. "I don't use any chemicals and darn little water."

As there is no natural supply of water at his home, what water he uses he draws from a well down the road, hauling it back in an aging pickup truck. A generator supplies electricity for lights and a computer. He has a few chickens running about that he keeps for eggs, and a goat for milk.

Fennell told Walley he had "recently" received a letter from the Lincoln National Forest office stating he'll be charged with trespassing unless he prepares various papers and forms, which he claims would likely put him out of business.

Specifically, the service is demanding that he file a "plan of operation" – a document describing the extent of his operation, the equipment to be used, restoration plans and other details. It's a standard request demanded of those wishing to mine or log or otherwise obtain resources from federal land. But applicants have found that when completed, further demands are made for ratcheting up requirements, thereby making it very difficult if not impossible for small-scale entrepreneurs like Fennell to operate.

"Once I file the paper [a plan of operation], the Forest Service will impose such a huge reclamation bond that I won't be able to afford it," he explained. "I have watched them do it to my neighbors. They are all gone now. I am the last miner in the Jicarilla Mountains."

Although they insist Fennell should jump through a series of bureaucratic hoops, the Forest Service and its employees say they object only to his living arrangements, which they regard as squatting.

"Fennell has a legal right to his claim, but he is illegally occupying cabins that are on national forest land," Lincoln National Forest ranger Jerry Hawks told Walley.

But Fennell has a copy of a 1999 ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that says miners can live on their claims if they can produce possessory title and vested rights for structures and equipment.

And according to Walley, he does have tax records showing he has paid taxes on the structures and equipment for years.

Recently, Rene Romo of the Albuquerque Journal visited Fennell, and talked with Johnny Wilson, Forest Service's recreation and lands staff officer.

As far as Wilson and the Forest Service are concerned, Fennell doesn't run a true mining operation, Romo reported, despite his having a home "littered with various types of equipment used to sift through fine, dry dirt."

"He [Fennell] has done what is called prospecting – a pick and shovel operation," said Wilson.

"Well," Fennell retorts, "how have I made a living all these years?"

He wouldn't tell Romo how much money he has made over the years, but Fennell did say that selling gold, at the current rate of about $351 per ounce on the spot market, has sustained him "for decades."

In October, Fennell received notice from the Forest Service that he had 90 days to pack up and get out, "without further changing the historic structures." That period was up yesterday, Jan. 15. Wilson told Romo that if he had not left by the deadline, the agency would seek a court order for eviction. The next step would be for Fennell and the Forest Service to battle it out in court over whether the long-time resident has the right to live on his mining claim and who actually owns or has the right to control what remains of the town of Jicarilla.

That latter is a major bone of contention, since the Forest Service claims the buildings as its own. According to Fennell, the congregation of the Jicarilla Community Church used the old school house as a chapel until a few days before last Easter, when the Forest Service padlocked the door and posted a sign reading:

"PROPERTY of THE UNITED STATES" and warning "All Persons Are Prohibited Under Penalty of the Law from Committing Any Trespass."

At their meeting in August, Fennell showed Walley an envelope stuffed with "well-thumbed documents" he has collected over the last few years.

"Look at this," he exclaimed, selecting a record dealing with the schoolhouse. "This building has been used as a church since the '30s. How can the Forest Service just padlock and post it?"

And if he leaves, what will happen to the buildings? The Forest Service admits having no plans for restoration – it just doesn't want Fennell or anyone else living there.

"For years I have watched and cared for this building [the now-locked church] and the others," Fennell remarked. "If the Forest Service pushes me out, in a couple of weeks what is left of this little village will be vandalized or bulldozed and burned by the feds."

Fennell said he has asked the Forest Service to prove they even own the land on which his claim is located. Being in the middle of a forest is not automatic proof of federal ownership. There may be private, state and county holdings.

"All they have provided is a copy of an executive order signed by President Woodrow Wilson that indicates certain lands must be taken to connect the Lincoln National Forest to another national forest," said Fennell. "As best as I can determine through my research, this land may not even belong to the Forest Service."

Walley describes the title trail as "incredibly convoluted." Besides successive ownership by Spain, Mexico and the Republic of Texas, Jicarilla has been part of three New Mexico counties over the past hundred years, as boundaries were shifted. The Lincoln County tax assessor's office admitted, "There is really no way to know where all the records for Jicarilla are located."

Fennell is not saying he owns Jicarilla, but he is questioning the jurisdiction of the U.S. Forest Service. As he sees it, there are other more likely owners than the U.S. Forest Service.

"I've told them [the Forest Service], you show me proof of ownership, and it's over. I'm gone," Fennell explained to Romo. "The only thing I'm claiming here is the mining claim, my mine and the houses. The town, the history, the land belongs to the state of New Mexico, the county of Lincoln and the people. That's my firm position."

6 posted on 01/17/2003 8:18:00 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
"The Feds think that they own it all."

I had hoped that with the election of President Bush, there would have been some sanity injected into land policy concerning us step-children of the West. However, my hopes have been dashed. They've pushed us just about as far as they can. I see a bad moon rising.

7 posted on 01/17/2003 8:23:03 AM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Does he have a claim filed ????
8 posted on 01/17/2003 8:25:59 AM PST by clamper1797 (Per Caritate Viduaribus Orphanibusque Sed Prime Viduaribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
He needs to contact his local chapter of the Clampers ... Lost Dutchman Chapter in Arizona. They have a fund setup to fight such actions. BTW The Clampers are first and formost a gold-mining faternaty
9 posted on 01/17/2003 8:28:04 AM PST by clamper1797 (Per Caritate Viduaribus Orphanibusque Sed Prime Viduaribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
"Does he have a claim filed ????"

Did you read the whole story? - Yes, he has several claims, all of which are old enough to acquire fee-simple title to the land if he wishes to.

10 posted on 01/17/2003 8:28:34 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Federal Law says he has very right to be there.
The gubbamint is attempting to evict him by fiat.
They hope they can intimidate him enough to so he will voluntarily leave.
Let's pray he is able to stand up to these jackals.
It will be a costly fight, despite the fact that the law is in his favor.
The environmental wackos running the US Forest Service (Clintonista bureaucrats) don't give a damn about the law.

(BTW: Most of the casinos and luxury properties around Lake Tahoe are sitting there without any more right to be there than this guy. Except this guy is actually working his mining claim, as the law requires. Why don't the feds go after the casinos instead?)

11 posted on 01/17/2003 8:29:35 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
but I thought bush wants everyone to be able to work. if you believe that, then use the FR mail system to contact me about my deed to the brooklyn bridge which I now have sole legal ownership of.
12 posted on 01/17/2003 8:30:05 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
I just did .... The g-damn gubmint at its best ....
13 posted on 01/17/2003 8:32:00 AM PST by clamper1797 (Per Caritate Viduaribus Orphanibusque Sed Prime Viduaribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
"The Clampers are first and formost a gold-mining faternaty..."

Hmmmmm, My impression was that they were an alcohol absorbing squad :o)

I've never seen anyone who can party like clampers!

14 posted on 01/17/2003 8:32:26 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Hmmmmm, My impression was that they were an alcohol absorbing squad

It's DAMNED (hic) vicious rumor ...

BTW check out my profile ...

Sorry the pic links aren't working now. I''ve been to busy (lazy) to fix em

15 posted on 01/17/2003 8:35:47 AM PST by clamper1797 (Per Caritate Viduaribus Orphanibusque Sed Prime Viduaribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Except this guy is actually working his mining claim, as the law requires. Why don't the feds go after the casinos instead?

The casinos are "mining" the pockets of the fools who gamble!

16 posted on 01/17/2003 8:39:10 AM PST by JimRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

There's ghold in them thar hills, eh?
Yeah. But "mining" the gold from gamblers' pockets isn't what the federal lode claim laws are meant to protect or encourage. But they don't go after the casinos, who have unlimited funds to fight a prolonged legal battle. They go after the lil' ol' prospector who is actually following the law. He's powerless to fight the Clintonista bureaucrats. Like jackals and hyenas, they'll go after the weak.

17 posted on 01/17/2003 8:45:33 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
They do, because the people let them get away with their obscene land grabs. The gov't needs this land for building more secret places so that when the New World Order is "officially" declared, well, you fill in the rest.

FReegards
18 posted on 01/17/2003 8:46:26 AM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob; editor-surveyor
I had hoped that with the election of President Bush, there would have been some sanity injected into land policy concerning us step-children of the West.

Well, take heart. The story has just come out today in World Net Daily. It obviously hasn't made a ripple in Washington yet. Sometimes we out West think our local concerns with the feds reverberate in D.C., when 99 percent of the time the squabbles are the result of citizens versus local or state-based bureaucrat-kings who don't always share their "on-the-ground" actions with their superiors. I'm guessing this story has legs, and that there will be some movement "up-top" if it continues in the public eye.

That said, I wonder just how many people the Forest Service employs just to try to make claim to land that miners, ranchers, and others have worked for years or even decades. What an utter, venal, wrongheaded waste of our money.

19 posted on 01/17/2003 8:50:49 AM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
It's time for them to realize they have become very separated from the people that do own it, American citizens. We own them, not vise versa, and they have no business acting "on our behalf" unless we cast a popular vote that they do so. We need this type of legislation given that the congress and senate no longer bother to read legislation much less check it against the Constitution.

Legislation of such deep concern to Americans should not be allowed to be treated so lightly by our elected officials, it should go before public vote, along with all treaties and trade deals.
20 posted on 01/17/2003 12:38:29 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson