To: Frank_Discussion
The warheads are now empty but no one knows what happened to the chemicals.
5 posted on
01/16/2003 9:59:08 AM PST by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: PhiKapMom
That's kinda my point, that chemicals declared are now missing. Plus it seems that they shouldn't have the little beasties in any event.
Boom?
To: PhiKapMom
I wonder what excuse the Hollywood elites will come up with for Saddam now?
Mike Ferrell (Actor "MASH" = Hunnycut) will be the first to defend Saddam I'm sure
19 posted on
01/16/2003 10:02:24 AM PST by
MJY1288
(Hillary is a threat to National Security)
To: PhiKapMom
The warheads are now empty but no one knows what happened to the chemicals. IIRC, chemical shells are usually binary -- they're relatively inert until two different chemicals are mixed together at the time the shell explodes.
In that case, the binary "innards" might be stored apart from the shells themselves. The existence of these shells implies that Iraq may (and probably does) have the rest of the chemicals in storage someplace else.
44 posted on
01/16/2003 10:06:57 AM PST by
r9etb
To: PhiKapMom
It's being hid with the Plutonium in some poor Schmucks house.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson