Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grim truth about to emerge in Iraq
London Mirror ^ | January 16, 2003 | Christopher Hitchens

Posted on 01/16/2003 4:49:02 AM PST by ejdrapes

GRIM TRUTH ABOUT TO EMERGE IN IRAQ
Jan 16 2003
Christopher Hitchens

EVERYBODY seems to know the apparently smart things to say about Iraq these days.

You can get through any conversation or chat show by pulling a solemn face or adopting a serious tone and saying: "Well, the government hasn't made its case on weapons of mass destruction and there's no clear link between Saddam and al-Qaeda and, anyway, we need another UN declaration."

Those who have been getting through the past month by saying this are in danger of looking foolish in the extreme a few weeks from now. But that's what often happens to people who allow their thinking to be done for them.

On the weapons issue, for example, it is perfectly obvious that the Iraqi regime has something to hide.

The UN resolution on disarmament quite clearly requires Saddam to prove that he has disarmed. It is not a matter of waiting for the inspectors - in a country the size of Texas - to ask the right question.

Instead, the Ba'athists insultingly handed over a bunch of unsorted documents, which even Hans Blix (the man who once certified Iraq as "exemplary" and North Korea as clean) was forced to say were full of unexplained gaps.

(On the very same day as the document dump, Saddam Hussein made an insane speech in which he called for a united front with the forces of jihad, and expressed support for the pro- al-Qaeda forces in Kuwait.)

The only disclosure worth having has been about the amazing scale of the previous Iraqi attempt to acquire nuclear weapons; an attempt that was much closer to fruition than we had thought by the time of the last Gulf War. Of course, they lied about it then, too.

I can add some further detail, which is somewhat better than anecdotal. A very senior former inspector, who is a highly-regarded international civil servant, told me that he had been offered his own personal Swiss bank account by a top official in Saddam's government, on condition that he produced a favourable report.

HE declined the offer, which he later discovered had been accepted by some junior members of his staff.

The Iraqis later tried to poison his food, which he had to have flown in from Bahrain thereafter.

I doubt that Hans Blix has taken any bribes but his past leniency is notorious and it is an open secret that the Russian and French delegates to the UN, both friendly to Iraq, lobbied very hard to have him awarded the job.

This was after they had vetoed the reappointment of Rolf Ekeus, who had conducted very efficient inspections in the period immediately after 1992.

However, the United States and several Iraqi dissident groups have sources of their own on the whereabouts of some key sites, and the time is approaching when Blix and Saddam will be put to the test.

If I were you, I would watch out for the discovery that Saddam Hussein has been using cellars and tunnels underneath mosques to hide his weaponry: a disclosure that might have its effect in the Muslim world and at the United Nations.

And when the regime falls, which it will do in any case, there will be some other uncoverings that will astonish the world. Secret prisons, mass graves, bizarre sites and maniac palaces... just you wait. On the question of Saddam's links to terrorism, attention is now beginning to focus on the Ansar-al Islam group in northern Iraq.

This gang, which has clear and demonstrable connections with al-Qaeda, is made up of Arabs who have recently fled Afghanistan. They are concentrated in the Kurdish areas which have declared their independence from Saddam's rule, and they spend all their time trying to destroy the leadership of the autonomous Kurdish zone.

Now, why on earth would they want to do that? It doesn't seem like the highest priority of a holy war.

Saddam's other connections, to the suicide bombers in Palestine - and to the recently deceased Abu Nidal and his network of assassins - are so well known that one hardly needs to repeat them (though they appear to have escaped the attention of the Anglican bishops, whose most recent statement applies the presumption of innocence to Saddam in a really quite touching fashion).

Indeed, those who speak in the name of religion appear to go quite silly when confronted with this pagan Caligula who makes his people worship him and builds mosques dedicated to himself - and probably to other things.

BRITISH Muslim leaders have referred to Iraq as a "Muslim country", which it is not.

It is the home of some of the world's oldest Christian populations, and the place of innumerable pre-Christian and pre-Islamic treasures and was, until a few decades ago, the home of a enormous Jewish population.

Those who speak about the importance of "multiculturalism" in their own case should not forget it when it comes to others.

They should also be careful about identifying their sacred texts with the cause of a worldly despot.

Finally, what is all this about waiting for the UN?

Everybody is in favour of observing the rules and procedures of international law, and the Security Council has voted unanimously so far.

To speak of the need for another resolution is to put the cart right in front of the horse.

We don't know what will be revealed before any intervention takes place but some revelations would be enough in themselves to make a case for war. In such a case one would hope that Clare Short, for example, would criticise any Russian or Chinese or French veto that obstructed the will of the majority.

Especially since she seems to be saying at the moment that she'd be in favour of intervention just as long as she had more people on her side...

The Prime Minister is quite right to be impatient with arguments like this, from speakers who more or less admit that they have no minds of their own.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
Interesting to see this printed in the Mirror - as left-wing of a newspaper as they come...
1 posted on 01/16/2003 4:49:02 AM PST by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
Thanks Registered

2 posted on 01/16/2003 4:51:09 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
i really think Hitchens is a conservative in leftist drag. He certainly seems to make points we agree with on FR regarding Clinton and now Saddam.
3 posted on 01/16/2003 5:07:44 AM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
He's a lurker. =)
4 posted on 01/16/2003 5:17:41 AM PST by PokeyJoe (Save an Iraqi, eat a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
"....On the very same day as the document dump, Saddam Hussein made an insane speech in which he called for a united front with the forces of jihad, and expressed support for the pro- al-Qaeda forces in Kuwait."
5 posted on 01/16/2003 5:18:42 AM PST by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
i really think Hitchens is a conservative in leftist drag.

I have to agree. He actually makes sense most of the time. Not all but most.

6 posted on 01/16/2003 5:19:04 AM PST by NC Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Thanks for posting this. As I was reading this, I was going to ask you the slant of the Mirror, and you answered it for me already.

Hitchens facts should be given wide publicity here in the States. Eg, Iraq was a multi-cultural entity until the new Caligula took over.
7 posted on 01/16/2003 5:19:14 AM PST by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

Hitchens broke with the Left in the same way that Ben Stein, Sr., Ben Wattenberg, Hannah Arendt, and other members of the New York intellegentsia broke with the Left.

The New York Jewish intellectual community that was a driving force behind Commentary magazine woke up one day in the Seventies and realized that Soviet Communism was a threat to the liberties of the world in general, and the Jewish people in particular.

Hitchens has made the same, unapologetic break while maintaining his democratic (small "d") Socialist, atheist leanings (his brother Peter is a Righteous Tory, opposes New Labour at every turn, and is a practicing Catholic). Hitchens understood that the Ramsey Clarkes and John le Carre's of this world blame the messenger, and ignore the message. They do this as they appease evil; throwing their hands in the air as they say, "I am opposed as anyone to the continued rule of Saddam Hussein, but....".

Hitchens became painfully aware of this atmosphere of appeasement in his last few months at The Nation. He left in disgust at the goings-on there.

In the fight against Islamic Fascism, the Left is of no use.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

8 posted on 01/16/2003 5:21:28 AM PST by section9 (And why do the French plant trees on the Champs Elysee? So the Germans can march in the shade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
What are we waiting for.....Dan Rather is in Iraq!
9 posted on 01/16/2003 5:22:18 AM PST by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: section9
So you're saying he's an honest man?
10 posted on 01/16/2003 5:25:11 AM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
A very senior former inspector, who is a highly-regarded international civil servant, told me that he had been offered his own personal Swiss bank account by a top official in Saddam's government, on condition that he produced a favourable report.

Thus one now can understand Scott Ritter. He's found where to get his bread buttered.

11 posted on 01/16/2003 5:25:17 AM PST by twntaipan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Bump!
12 posted on 01/16/2003 5:30:10 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
bump
13 posted on 01/16/2003 5:33:19 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Darth Crackerhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
You would be surprised how often people use his statements there are no WMD in Iraq to claim we're only going to war there for the oil. When I tell them of his former statements claiming Saddam was hiding WMD they're amazed. Ritter is a whore.
14 posted on 01/16/2003 5:34:59 AM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
A surprisingly great article!
15 posted on 01/16/2003 5:38:26 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
Hitchens, like George Orwell, is a socialist only conservatives can love.
16 posted on 01/16/2003 5:39:08 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
bfl
17 posted on 01/16/2003 6:04:52 AM PST by oyez (Ammo first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Hitch BUMP
18 posted on 01/16/2003 7:35:48 AM PST by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Ahhhhh, it's Christopher Hitchens. I didn't read the author until after I read the article.

Well done.

Hitchens' left-wing credentials are still pretty solid, so I'm not surprised this showed up in the Mirror.
19 posted on 01/16/2003 7:40:06 AM PST by wimpycat (Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Tick....tick....tick....tick...
20 posted on 01/16/2003 7:51:58 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson